Members banned from this thread: AProudLefty


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: What happens if DEMOCRATS fail to suppress the evidence of their election theft?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default What happens if DEMOCRATS fail to suppress the evidence of their election theft?

    “Fraud vitiates everything” and “fruit of the poison tree.”

    In 1878, in United States v. Throckmorton, the Supreme Court held that “There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments.”

    In plain English, fraud invalidates an election. “Void ab initio“ which means that fraud from the beginning taints everything resulting from it.

    The Supreme Court, in 1939, explained in Nardone v. United States that if a tree is poisonous, so too is its fruit.

    This means that, if fraud is shown, the election is invalid. Biden is not president and every action his regime took is void as if it never happened.

    Of course, that’s never occurred - yet - in a presidential election, but it’s happened in lower elections.

    If void ab initio fails, there’s no blueprint to correct the 2020 election because Congress, the states, and the Supreme Court allowed an unconstitutional inauguration to occur in the first place.

    Nonetheless, the theft of the highest office in the land simply cannot stand. As New York, California, and other DEMOCRAT-dominated states are seeing in their streets today, if you allow thieves to steal or thugs to harass and assault with impunity, you get more of each.

    The same holds true with election fraud, and the subsequent usurpation of the apparatus of government and the coercive powers that come with it.

    If this theft is allowed to stand, then no American can go forward with confidence in the nation’s elections and the system based on them.


    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/06/peacefully_and_proactively_dealing_with_election_f raud.html

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 829 Times in 788 Posts

    Default

    Depends. If the Democrats (or any other party) were in a position like PRI in Mexico was, or Maduro is in Venezuela, then it makes no difference. Fraud gets ignored and the fact that the election was a sham becomes as irrelevant as the election itself.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Fraud gets ignored.
    They're trying. What if they don't succeed?

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,827
    Thanks
    19,711
    Thanked 9,447 Times in 7,737 Posts
    Groans
    835
    Groaned 509 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    If there was fraud, it won't hide forever.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    “Fraud vitiates everything” and “fruit of the poison tree.”

    In 1878, in United States v. Throckmorton, the Supreme Court held that “There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments.”

    In plain English, fraud invalidates an election. “Void ab initio“ which means that fraud from the beginning taints everything resulting from it.

    The Supreme Court, in 1939, explained in Nardone v. United States that if a tree is poisonous, so too is its fruit.

    This means that, if fraud is shown, the election is invalid. Biden is not president and every action his regime took is void as if it never happened.

    Of course, that’s never occurred - yet - in a presidential election, but it’s happened in lower elections.

    If void ab initio fails, there’s no blueprint to correct the 2020 election because Congress, the states, and the Supreme Court allowed an unconstitutional inauguration to occur in the first place.

    Nonetheless, the theft of the highest office in the land simply cannot stand. As New York, California, and other DEMOCRAT-dominated states are seeing in their streets today, if you allow thieves to steal or thugs to harass and assault with impunity, you get more of each.

    The same holds true with election fraud, and the subsequent usurpation of the apparatus of government and the coercive powers that come with it.

    If this theft is allowed to stand, then no American can go forward with confidence in the nation’s elections and the system based on them.


    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/06/peacefully_and_proactively_dealing_with_election_f raud.html
    American Thinker

    Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

    Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
    Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
    Factual Reporting: LOW
    Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
    Media Type: Website
    Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
    MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-thinker/
    Lock Him Up

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Trumpet For This Post:

    no worries (06-15-2021)

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    If there was fraud, it won't hide forever.
    The forces conspiring to hide it are considerable, witting or not.

    What happens if DEMOCRATS fail to suppress the evidence of their election theft?

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    The forces conspiring to hide it are considerable, witting or not.

    What happens if DEMOCRATS fail to suppress the evidence of their election theft?
    Leprosy, the big steal=the big lie.
    Lock Him Up

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 829 Times in 788 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    They're trying. What if they don't succeed?
    Then we're stuck where we are, and states that do pass stricter voting laws will have less potential for fraud while Democrat led states will pass stuff like HR1 and SR 1 and eventually get caught mass cheating. Then they'll reluctantly pass stricter voting laws too.

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 829 Times in 788 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpet View Post
    American Thinker

    Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

    Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
    Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
    Factual Reporting: LOW
    Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
    Media Type: Website
    Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
    MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-thinker/
    Don't you just love how predictable the Left is? They can't make a credible counter argument so they resort to ad hominem, attacks on the sources, and other fallacies to try and divert attention from how stupid their position has been proven...

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Then we're stuck where we are.
    If they don't succeed in suppressing the evidence of their election theft?

  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 829 Times in 788 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    If they don't succeed in suppressing the evidence of their election theft?
    Like I stated, they'll sheepishly apologize while not fixing a thing until pushed and then they'll make some half-assed changes to voting laws to try and say they fixed the problem...

  13. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Like I stated, they'll sheepishly apologize while not fixing a thing until pushed and then they'll make some half-assed changes to voting laws to try and say they fixed the problem...
    You don't think the 2020 election results will be challenged if they don't succeed in suppressing the evidence of their election theft??

  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 829 Times in 788 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    You don't think the 2020 election results will be challenged if they don't succeed in suppressing the evidence of their election theft??
    At this point, no I don't. But if that happened, in the 2022 and 2024 it'd be better if the Democrats don't bother to run candidates...

  15. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    At this point, no I don't. But if that happened, in the 2022 and 2024 it'd be better if the Democrats don't bother to run candidates...
    If they succeed in suppressing the evidence of their election theft and make cheating legal with H.R. 1 it will be as you say, in all likelihood.

    What if they fail to suppress the evidence of their election theft?

  16. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 829 Times in 788 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    If they succeed in suppressing the evidence of their election theft and make cheating legal with H.R. 1 it will be as you say, in all likelihood.

    What if they fail to suppress the evidence of their election theft?
    The best kept lies end up in the public square at some point. So, unless there is one guy doing it like some election fraud Unibomber, it will be found out. How the Democrats handle the leak is what needs to be determined.

Similar Threads

  1. Is evidence of Biden's election theft being discovered?
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: 05-05-2021, 01:48 PM
  2. Legion: Is evidence of Biden's election theft being discovered?
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-04-2021, 12:11 PM
  3. DEMOCRATS using their power to suppress political opposition
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-03-2021, 03:03 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-22-2019, 07:11 AM
  5. How the Democrats suppress the vote
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-15-2012, 09:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •