Science says vaccines not necessary in some instances

[Darth Omar]

Scientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server (not peer-reviewed).

https://www.news-medical.net/amp/new...mpression=true
______________

Science says people who have had a prior Covid infection don’t need to be vaccinated. Per, a Cleveland Clinic study that is awaiting peer review.

And it shouldn’t need that, because the findings comport with the long-held understanding that prior infections result in immunity.

Rhetoric question: will Fauci, the CDC and Big Pharma ‘follow the science’? We all know the answer. ‘Following the science’ has become a punchline to a joke on account of these jokers.

If they want to follow *the science* it should be suggested that people take a Covid antibody test prior to being vaccinated because they may not need one. And obviously, if they’ve had a known infection it’s *safe* to assume they are protected.

And healthy kids, just hell no. But we/they left science based, evidence based and data based public health policy in the rear view mirror about a year ago.

It’s only a question of why.

And one more thing [not that it will do any good saying it, again]: if you are immune to Covid you don’t need to trouble yourself with people who aren’t vaccinated. They are no threat to you.

[ThatOwlWoman]

And the pandemic has claimed 61 victims.

[Trumpet]

Scientists from the Cleveland Clinic, USA, have recently evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) vaccination among individuals with or without a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination, indicating that COVID-19 vaccines should be prioritized to individuals without prior infection. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server (not peer-reviewed).

https://www.news-medical.net/amp/new...mpression=true
______________

Science says people who have had a prior Covid infection don’t need to be vaccinated. Per, a Cleveland Clinic study that is awaiting peer review.

And it shouldn’t need that, because the findings comport with the long-held understanding that prior infections result in immunity.

Rhetoric question: will Fauci, the CDC and Big Pharma ‘follow the science’? We all know the answer. ‘Following the science’ has become a punchline to a joke on account of these jokers.

If they want to follow *the science* it should be suggested that people take a Covid antibody test prior to being vaccinated because they may not need one. And obviously, if they’ve had a known infection it’s *safe* to assume they are protected.

And healthy kids, just hell no. But we/they left science based, evidence based and data based public health policy in the rear view mirror about a year ago.

It’s only a question of why.

And one more thing [not that it will do any good saying it, again]: if you are immune to Covid you don’t need to trouble yourself with people who aren’t vaccinated. They are no threat to you.

So you, and your superior medical expertise are going to challenge Fauci??????????????

[Darth Omar]

So you, and your superior medical expertise are going to challenge Fauci??????????????

Seems we are a little late in challenging him lol?

[Hawkeye10]

Shocking.