I mean, even if this cheap diversionary attempt to change the subject were valid, I could point to several examples of Democrats storming capitals and/or praising and encouraging the storming of capitals and YEARS other Democrat 24/7 terrorism.
aoc incite violence.jpg
.
pelosi incite violence.jpg
.
cuomo violence quote.jpg
.
hillary violence.jpg
.
waters violence quote.jpg
What else you got?
And President Trump tried to provide security at the Capitol Building but Democrats rejected it. You have no one to blame for those cops' deaths (how convenient, the first police deaths you aren't celebrating) but yourselves, both for stealing the presidency and for denying the needed security.
artichoke (06-12-2021)
When those who are ignorant of everything...try to lecture and condescend to normal, thinking adults, and get humiliated by common knowledge facts. This constant reality of "debating" with the low-IQ conspiracy theorists of the left is half of what brings me back here.
You just have to point and laugh.
Matt Dillon (06-12-2021)
And all of that bought to you by lists compiled by “the Federalist,” “Brietfart,” some weird blog, a tweeter, and some guy on you tube
NEXT
1) *brought
2) Invalid "attack the source" fallacy, from the person whose sources are continuously humiliated and exposed as liars.
3) Only allowing Democrat sources means no other side of the story will ever get out. What a convenient little arrangement for you. Stupid attempt at rigging everything for yourself (with your repeatedly discredited sources) with bullshit rules that ban everyone who DOESN'T constantly get caught lying for Democrats.
4) Hurling off-topic smears is an invalid ad hominem fallacy and in no way refutes the claims made or the evidence presented. Learn how to debate at an adult level.
Next.
Bookmarks