Originally Posted by
Flash
That is a bit of a stretch. Socialism primarily refers to the production and distribution of goods and generally applies to public ownership of major industries. Even communist nations allow private ownership of small businesses. Marxist theory has often proved unsuccessful and in practice we see countries like China allowing more private ownership of a share of the state owned enterprises. With Raul gone even Cuba is opening up to more small business enterprises. China is encouraging doctors to open their own private clinics and hospitals.
I am just attempting an objective description of reality. We both know the state will never wither away and there are many variations among nations calling themselves communist.
As you know, neither China, Cuba nor North Korea have a free press.
And those changes you describe are capitalist, not socialist, so they are not a rebuttal of the definition of socialisms. "Distribution" includes retail outlets. And "public ownership", in reality, means State ownership.
The State did wither away in Somalia.
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
— Joe Biden on Obama.
Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.
D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.
Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".
Bookmarks