What should be the consequences of attempting to overthrow our government

[Poor Richard Saunders]

you're tard-tastic.

Thanks for playing the Troll. It's one thing you seem to think you are good at.

One thing you don't seem to be good at is providing evidence to support your statement that BLM attacked police officers.

But here is more evidence of Trump supporters attacking police officers

[Poor Richard Saunders]

'A riot is the language of the unheard,' Martin Luther King Jr. explained 53 years ago

Riots occur on the street in neighborhoods. This is clearly an attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters unhappy with the outcome of a free and fair election.

[Drummie123]

No evidence to present to us? And you call me brainwashed? I am not preventing you from posting actual evidence here where we can discuss it's validity. But it seems you can't provide us with even specious arguments other than accusing anyone that doesn't swallow your unsupported hogwash without question of being an ideologue.

The people responsible for judging the evidence refuse to consider it.

Why?

The Washington Examiner


George Soros contributes record $50M to back 2020 Democratic efforts
by Mica Soellner, Breaking News Reporter | | July 27, 2020 04:06 PM

Liberal billionaire George Soros is breaking his own record by pouring more than $50 million into Democratic campaigns and causes just months before the November election.

Soros, an advocate with deep pockets for liberal causes, doled out $48 million total through his political action committee, Democracy PAC, which was created last year. An additional $4 million was given directly to Democratic campaigns and committees.

His spending is already more than double than the amount he committed to in the 2016 election cycle, the Washington Free Beacon reported Monday.

Federal data shows that the organizations receiving money from Democracy PAC include groups seeking to keep Democratic control of the House, Planned Parenthood, and various Senate campaigns.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...cratic-efforts

[Drummie123]

Riots occur on the street in neighborhoods. This is clearly an attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters unhappy with the outcome of a free and fair election.

You will like the consequences of the DNC intransigence even less than you like the 1/6/21 DC protest.

[Drummie123]

Riots occur on the street in neighborhoods. This is clearly an attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters unhappy with the outcome of a free and fair election.

riot
n. A wild or turbulent disturbance created by a large number of people.
n. A violent disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled for a common purpose.
n. An unrestrained outbreak, as of laughter or passions.

More at Wordnik from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

Not insurrection. Not a coup d'etat.

The riot was in response to the Democrat coup d'etat.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The people responsible for judging the evidence refuse to consider it.

Why?


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...cratic-efforts

They refused to consider it? I am curious as to which court rulings you have actually read. It's funny that you accuse me of only relying on the media but then you only post information from the media.

Here - read this court ruling and tell me what evidence you think the court failed to consider. Also explain how Soros was involved in the court ruling since you seem to want to make a specious argument that he prevented courts from hearing evidence.
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/...f&seqNo=315395

[Drummie123]

Soros spent less money than the Koch brothers.


https://www.latimes.com/business/sto...-money-network

If you are truly upset by spending and not an ideologue that simply hates spending by liberals then you should be decrying the spending by the Koch brothers long before you attack Soros.

What was Soros buying?

I say he bought the favoritism and integrity of the people who would disallow the evidence of the steal after Soros orchestrated the steal.

You intend to rob the bank. Then you bribe the bank guard to say he didn't see you the rob the bank.

What did the Koch's buy?

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The riot was in response to the Democrat coup d'etat.

Do you have any evidence to support your specious claim of the election being a "Democrat coup d'etat"? A picture of the violent seizure of power by Democrats would be a good start.


Coup d'etat.
1.
a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

It seems like an attempted coup could be confused with a riot if you ignore that the Trump supporters were attacking the US government to prevent it from using it's power to count electoral votes.


Do you have any pictures of Biden supporters attacking the government to seize power?

[Drummie123]

They refused to consider it? I am curious as to which court rulings you have actually read. It's funny that you accuse me of only relying on the media but then you only post information from the media.

Here - read this court ruling and tell me what evidence you think the court failed to consider. Also explain how Soros was involved in the court ruling since you seem to want to make a specious argument that he prevented courts from hearing evidence.
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/...f&seqNo=315395

Convicted Felon George Soros: Buying Off Corrupt Politicians To Destroy Elections For America’s Judicial System:

He’s spent $45 Million to influence our judiciary?

Yup, that’s right. Soros has plugged the cash into left-wing action groups which are attempting to “remake the judiciary and fundamentally change the way judges are selected in the United States.” It seems that 39 states have some form of ballot judicial elections- which hold these judges accountable to the people. Soros wants to see a “merit” selection process instead, one in which there is a special panel that makes a list of judicial candidates from which the governor would choose to appoint.

The power to elect judges would be transferred from the American people to this panel, a group of individuals who are not elected and who would be accountable to no one. Soros is working to rid all conservative leaning justices from consideration by getting individuals on these panels who represent left-of-center ideology such as members of trial lawyers associations and other legal elites.

Control the special panel and you control the judiciary.

The rationale of Soros’ plan is explained this way: The public is too stupid to make informed decisions about judges, therefore, using a “merit system” would ensure that judges who are appointed are qualified. Sandra Day O’Connor is a proponent of this “merit system”. She claims that voters are “too unsophisticated to evaluate judges”.

Face it folks, the Left thinks of us as “Useful Idiots”.

Hey, didn’t Lenin have useful idiots?

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/0...dicial-system/

[Poor Richard Saunders]

What was Soros buying?

I say he bought the favoritism and integrity of the people who would disallow the evidence of the steal after Soros orchestrated the steal.

You intend to rob the bank. Then you bribe the bank guard to say he didn't see you the rob the bank.

What did the Koch's buy?

Hmm.... So when the GOP wins and Koch spent money, they didn't buy anything. But if the Democrats win that that is proof that Soros orchestrated a steal? Your argument doesn't even make sense since it relies on made up bullshit on your part that you can't provide any evidence to support.

This is an attempt to steal an election result by not allowing it to be certified:

[Yakuda]

That makes them traitors to this country and if you are a law and order type of person, then you know and support that the consequences is the death penalty. It dam well doesn't support the idea that we let this group have a voice in this country.

What if the govt should be changed? Are we to assume that just because it's the govt they should be allowed to do anything they wish?

[Drummie123]

Do you have any evidence to support your specious claim of the election being a "Democrat coup d'etat"? A picture of the violent seizure of power by Democrats would be a good start.


Coup d'etat.
1.
a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

It seems like an attempted coup could be confused with a riot if you ignore that the Trump supporters were attacking the US government to prevent it from using it's power to count electoral votes.


Do you have any pictures of Biden supporters attacking the government to seize power?

You have to lie and cheat and deceive to win.

Your post demonstrates this.

The Left has stolen this country's government through deception and treachery.*



*treachery
the act or fact of violating the trust or confidence of another

[Drummie123]

Hmm.... So when the GOP wins and Koch spent money, they didn't buy anything. But if the Democrats win that that is proof that Soros orchestrated a steal? Your argument doesn't even make sense since it relies on made up bullshit on your part that you can't provide any evidence to support.

This is an attempt to steal an election result by not allowing it to be certified:

Convicted Felon George Soros: Buying Off Corrupt Politicians To Destroy Elections For America’s Judicial System:

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/0...dicial-system/

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Thanks for playing the Troll. It's one thing you seem to think you are good at.

One thing you don't seem to be good at is providing evidence to support your statement that BLM attacked police officers.

But here is more evidence of Trump supporters attacking police officers

you already admitted it was all true, backpedalling babboon.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Convicted Felon George Soros: Buying Off Corrupt Politicians To Destroy Elections For America’s Judicial System:

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/0...dicial-system/

I see you are "using the dishonest media to brainwash the populace into accepting the sham."

The sham being your unsupported claim that Soros is doing this when you have no evidence.

I notice you failed to read the court ruling and tell us what evidence the court didn't consider.
Let me post the link for you again.
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/...f&seqNo=315395

It seems you can't think for yourself, Drummie, but instead rely solely on the media that was used to brainwash you.