Oh, sorry, shit for brains, that your mom forgot to abort your wasted life.
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/91774...ay-fox-s-lawye
AProudLefty (05-07-2021)
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner
Or, more likely, YouTube only wants one position on this subject put on their site regardless of the content or reasoning of other positions...
No, debate should within the bounds of reason. You scumbags are just retard noise. No facts or logic or truth. Just hate and stupidity and lies.
Eat shit.
Let's start with this comment from the article you failed to read:
At least the author was nice enough to include--likely by accident--a nice tu quoque fallacy to show the hypocrisy of his whole column...Media lawyers note this is not the first time this sort of defense has been offered. A $10 million libel lawsuit filed by the owners of One America News Network against MSNBC's top star, Rachel Maddow, was dismissed in May when the judge ruled she had stretched the established facts allowably: "The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."
Then there's this irrelevant appeal to quantity:
And, the opening paragraph includes this bit of circular citation by the author to another piece he wrote...The Daily Beast reported Tuesday that Fox recently slashed its research team, cutting it by about one-fourth during modest networkwide layoffs. Fox News said that is overstating the size of the cut to the unit. It said it eliminated duplication and those functions are conducted elsewhere throughout its newsroom and programs.
The link: https://www.npr.org/2020/07/12/89003...-bigoted-postsTucker Carlson appears to be made of Teflon. Fox News' top-rated host has been repeatedly accused of anti-immigrant and racist comments, which have cost his political opinion show many of its major advertisers. Yet Carlson endures in his prime-time slot.
So, one op ed writer on NPR trashes another op ed political talker who is on television, and that somehow amounts to proof...
Bookmarks