190 on Pan Am 103 alone, and there were other terrorist attacks.
I know your Russian propaganda sources have instructed you to defend Gaddafi, but he was a very bad person. He was far more a supporter of anti-American terrorism than Saddam ever was.
Actually, the Libyan people decided Gaddafi had to die. They rebelled against his tyranny, remember? They actually killed him. Americans certainly were out to get him at the same time... But it was the Libyans who did it.
Are you claiming that half century of Gaddafi terrorism acts were all false flag operations? That would be the longest series of false flag operations to kill one man ever. And if Obama is behind them all, he started it before he even entered elementary school.
stoopid.
when NATO went after Qadaffi, they were SUPPORTING TERRORISTS!
the NTC and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were domestic and international terrorists.
This is the bunch we were backing against Qadaffi:
You act like Lockerbie was the end of the story -it was a turning point instead for QadaffiLibyan Islamic Fighting Group - a Libyan terrorist group organized in 1995 and aligned with al-Qaeda;
seeks to radicalize the Libyan government; attempted to assassinate Qaddafi
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Li...Fighting+Group
https://www.hrw.org/node/248708/printable/print
Qadaffi handed over the Lockerbie suspects for trial, expelling Abu Nidal’s organisation and ending support for Hamas and Hezbollah, steps that helped secure the suspension of UN sanctions in 1999.
The 9/11 attacks were also highly significant in triggering a reassessment of UK policy toward Libya.
Gaddafi moved quickly to condemn the terrorist attacks on the US and exploited the moment to assert that the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) was not just a serious threat to him but to the world, emphasising its links to Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.
you fucking idiot.
it was a revolt by terrorists ( out of the east/Bengazi)
that turned into the civil war, that continues to this day with the factions still at odds.
Bengazi has Hiftar, Tripoli has UN backing..
the country is torn apart as well by outside powers like Turkey, Qatar and Egypt and Russia.
We facilitated and created a civil war that wrecked Libya and turned it into a failed terrorist ridden state.
Your hero Hillary and Susan Rice are up to their eyeballs in blood.
They turned the "no fly zone" into an all out military assault
Bengazi and Tripoli are 2 different factions - still are and Bengazi is where the revolt started.
Until the NTC took Sirte and Misrata those cities as well as Tripoli backed Qadaffi.
it was NOT A POPULAR REVOLT -the NTC/LIFG never picked up any popular support as they gained territory
It was not "the Libyan people" that backed the revolt -just the armed terrorists "beasts from the east"
as Qadaffi called them
Once Qadaffi was killed the NTC took power, and started the militias to run the security of the country.
Militia rules led to the breakdown of the country into local warring factions
"we came we saw he died" ( Hillary on her bloodthirsty misadventures)
The terrorist attack on Pan Am 103 happened in 1988. Al Qaeda had just formed, and ISIS had not formed within Al Qaeda. They were not doing operations outside of the Afghanistan area. Clinton was a corporate lawyer married to the Governor of Arkansas.
The problem with your attempt to defend Gaddafi is his long history. He was a terrorist for 50 years. You need to prove 50 years of terrorism to be a lie. Pan Am 103 was a response to Reagan's bombing of Libya, are you willing to side with a terrorist over Reagan?
Obama hit ISIS repeatedly hard, and did the absolute opposite of supporting it. Clinton did not give them weapons, they were in a part of the world with a lot of weapons.
Bookmarks