Is evidence of Biden's election theft being discovered?

[domer76]

Blehar’s findings from his Pennsylvania analysis include the following:

• The total number of WIMP votes in Pennsylvania declined by ~113,000 votes from 2016 to 2020. This is highly unlikely given the massive number of mail-in ballots cast in 2020 compared to previous elections.
• Only 453 write-in votes were received by mail-in ballot out of 2.6 million mail-in ballots cast. This is an improbably low number given that Howie Hawkins, the Green Party write-in presidential candidate, received ~34,000 fewer votes by mail-in than down-ballot Green Party average. Note that a similar situation occurred with Jill Stein in 2016 in Pennsylvania, causing her to refer to the Keystone State’s election system as a “national disgrace.”
• Jo Jorgenson, the Libertarian candidate for president, received ~20,000 votes fewer by mail-in than down-ballot Libertarian candidates. This is a highly unlikely circumstance and a historical anomaly that strongly suggests vote shifting took place.
• Vote-switching analysis determined that ~64,000 absentee ballot votes were taken from Trump and switched to Biden through the adjudication process, while ~30,000 Trump Election Day and absentee votes were directly shifted to Biden.

Blehar believes the following happened:

Conclusion #1: The total adjudication manipulation resulted in Biden winning the state by ~80,500 votes, but in reality, President Trump actually won Pennsylvania by over 186,000 votes.
Conclusion #2: Biden’s margin of victory could have only been obtained through adjudication manipulation.

Redstate. Lower right quadrant for conspiracy idiots.

[domer76]

This is an idiotic statement. There is no evidence that WIMP correlates with mail in votes. The increase in mail in votes gives us a decrease in WIMP in 2020 which may be because WIMP votes decrease as mail in ballots increase or it could have no correlation at all. Blehar gives no basis for his claim and it is unsupported by any facts.


More garbage that is unsupported by any facts. The fact that people split their votes between parties in not evidence of some conspiracy. In fact before the last couple of decades people often split their ballots between parties.


Again, a claim with no support.

I am curious as to how this supposed vote switching occurred. Considering that the vote count was close in the state, when and where were these ballots switched? When Pennsylvania started to count the 94,000 provisional ballots, Biden already had a lead of 53,476 votes. You earlier listed the definition of adjudication. Adjudication ONLY occurs when the ballot can't be read by the machines. Behler is claiming that 94,000 ballots were adjudicated and changed to Biden. It is interesting that number is the same as the total number of provisional ballots. Are Trump voters less able to fill out ballots correctly so only their ballots went to an adjudication process? That would seem to be a statistical impossibility.



If Biden won by 80,500 votes and 94,000 were switched how does that mean Trump won by 186,000? If we subtract 94,000 votes from Biden and give 94,000 votes to Trump that doesn't put Trump up by 186,000. Are you really this math impaired, Legion?

Dude, you’re wasting your precious time with this idiot.

[Legion]

Redstate. Lower right quadrant for conspiracy idiots.

[domer76]

I'm under no obligation to do so. The burden of proof lies with the claimant.

306-232. 80,000,000+ votes. Seven million popular vote win.

LANDSLIDE!

[domer76]

^Conspiracy idiot.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

I'm under no obligation to dispute your assertions.

I made no assertion. I made a conclusion which is clearly the correct one since no viable alternative conclusion exists or has been put forth.

[Legion]

I made a conclusion which is clearly the correct one since no viable alternative conclusion exists or has been put forth.

So you say.

You also said this:

Lack of evidence is not evidence of it not happening.

[Legion]

Green Party down ballot candidates received between 31,000 and 38,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania, but the Presidential candidate, Howie Hawkins, who was a write-in candidate, supposedly received less than 453 absentee votes.

It gets worse when you consider in-person votes.

A review of county level election reports in Pennsylvania determined Hawkins received just 611 votes overall (absentee + in-person), compared to other Green party statewide candidates who each received over 70,000 votes.




https://revealthesteal.blogspot.com/2021/04/wimp-vote-tabulation-nationwide-issue.html

[PostmodernProphet]

It's a shame we have to waste our time educating them like three year olds. But we do.

that time could better be used verifying ballots......

[PostmodernProphet]

So when are you going to provide any proof to defend your posts? Or are you not a claimant but in reality only an ignorant stooge?

why not wait for the results of the Maricopa audit?......

[Poor Richard Saunders]

So you say.

You also said this:

So you say. But then you don't really say anything, do you? You just post false bullshit from others that you don't understand and then you are unable to defend it so you deflect from the topic.

[PostmodernProphet]

No, in fact Rudi is going to do serious time for fabricating that.

sure......and people voted for Biden because he wasn't senile......

[Poor Richard Saunders]

why not wait for the results of the Maricopa audit?......

The one that the FBI is watching? Yes, let's do wait and see.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Blehar has examined the national implications of missing WIMP votes and their likely misadjudication.

Biden received over 15 million more votes than Hillary Clinton did while President Trump exceeded his 2016 vote total by over 11 million votes (unprecedented for a presidential reelection campaign in which he also received the highest percentage of non-white votes of any Republican candidate since 1960).

The DEMOCRAT popular vote margin over President Trump increased by ~4.2 million votes from 2016 to 2020 while the WIMP vote from 2016 to 2020 decreased by nearly the same amount (~4.3 million). The similarity of the numbers is highly suspicious.

Here are some of his other national-level findings and conclusions:

• Despite an increase in nationwide voter turnout of over 30 million from 2016 to 2020, there were three times fewer write-in votes in 2020 than in 2016. This makes no sense, especially given that Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Wisconsin relegated the Green Party to write-in status in their states.
• Across the country, write-in votes fell from 698,990 in 2016 to just 217,465 in 2020, with an impossibly low 13,803 of those votes coming from absentee ballots. Since nearly 48 million absentee ballots were cast in 2020, this means that only .00029% of absentee voters wrote in a candidate for President. This is highly unlikely, given that in 2016, scattered write-in ballots accounted for .05% of the total vote.
• In Pennsylvania, Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins received just 611 votes overall (absentee ballots plus in-person votes) compared to other Green party statewide candidates who each received over 70,000 votes. Biden’s margin of victory in Pennsylvania was 80,555, which is remarkably close to the potential number of “missing” Green Party (write-in) presidential votes.
• In Georgia, the decline in the write-in votes from 2016 to 2020 (~20,000) was also greater than Biden’s margin of victory (~12,600) in 2020.
• In Arizona, Trump’s victory margin in 2016 was 91,234 votes, but in 2020, the margin was almost completely erased by the decline in minor party votes from 2016 (89,207).
• Also in Arizona, the 2020 Biden victory margin was less than the decline in write-in votes from 2016. Biden won the state by approximately 10,000 votes while the number of write-in votes declines by nearly 17,000.
• The decline in write-in votes from 2016 to 2020 in Wisconsin (~27,000) could easily account for Biden’s margin of victory in the state (~20,000).

Conclusion #1: the massive decline in write-in votes from 2016 to 2020 likely points to a nationwide, systemic issue that was shifting votes through the adjudication process.
Conclusion #2: forensic audits of paper ballots and the ballot images are needed to determine what actually happened in 2020.

There were more write-in votes in 2020 than there were in 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000, 1996, 1992. So the argument that it makes no sense seems to be a serious failure to understand that it was 2016 election that saw huge discrepancies in ballots compared to other elections. The conclusions are nonsense that ignore the fact that 2020 was similar to every election this century except for 2016.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

So you say.

I don't say it. It is the undisputed conclusion that has been reached here.