‘He was guilty.’ Extra juror in favor of Chauvin conviction

[LV426]

only sometimes do jurors comply with judge instructions to stay off of social media and the internet

So you're accusing the jury of being liars without proof.

Meanwhile, you and your "very fine people" spent the last 10 months doing everything you can to defend Chauvin here on JPP.

So wouldn't YOU have had undue influence on the jury?????

After all, you and your pals couldn't keep your fucking mouths shut about it all year.

[Truth Detector]

Was it? Because Donald Trump was all over the news defending Chauvin for months before this was even brought to trial.

You were here on JPP poisoning the jury pool with your comments about Chauvin last fucking year.

[TOP]

No, no, no... They would never do that. It is not unheard of for a juror to be dismissed during deliberation. If you dismiss your alternates before deliberation, you can not replace a juror dismissed during deliberation.

She was actually sequestered for deliberation... Without even getting to deliberate. My guess is she just read a book in some waiting room, while the regular jurors deliberated, and then at night went back to the motel with the other jurors.

I'm telling you what I read.....if you can find other information, just let me know....
"Christensen was one of two alternates dismissed by Judge Peter Cahill after Monday's closing arguments. "
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/nati...ction/3014057/

[Walt]

Alternates are nothing more than spectators. They have no interaction with the 12 jurors or judge whatsoever (unless the judge calls on them). None.

They have as much interaction with the other jurors and judge as any other juror during the trial itself. They are left out of the deliberation, but are sequestered with the other jurors. In other words, they hang out with the other jurors everywhere except the deliberation room. They are also instructed by the judge the same as the other jurors.

[LV426]

This judge saying "Dont watch the news" indicates a person pretending like it is still the 1950's, watching the news is increasingly rare, we follow what is going on in different ways now.

OK, so you're accusing the jury of lying to the judge and breaking their oaths without any fucking evidence than your personal hurt feelings.

FUCK.

YOUR.

FEELINGS.

You were here on JPP FOR MONTHS lying about Chauvin and Floyd.

Check the fuckin' record, dipshit.

If anyone influenced the jury, it was you and your "very fine people" who couldn't keep your fucking mouths shut for 10 months.

[LV426]

You're a crybaby who cannot stand anything to scrutiny, because you're also a little bitch.

And you know it.

[Concart]

I gave my opinion...if you disagree, I'm fine with that....I didn't change your words or attack you personally....I'm not sure why you feel the need to do so, but that is your right....

Yes what I’m asking is why you feel the need to insult jurors. I guess because you think they would behave like you. Carry on.

[TOP]

Yes what I’m asking is why you feel the need to insult jurors. I guess because you think they would behave like you. Carry on.

I didn't insult any one....but you did.... "Carry on."

[Concart]

I didn't insult any one....but you did.... "Carry on."

Of course you did.

“No wonder she was dismissed”. Don’t pretend that isn’t an insult.

[TOP]

Of course you did.

“No wonder she was dismissed”. Don’t pretend that isn’t an insult.

That's your "insult"...not mine....

[Althea]

The 12 regular jurors have decided that Chauvin is guilty. If the defense had any doubts about that, they could have polled the jury. They did not, because they knew that the jury found him guilty. And at least one of the alternate jurors who sat with the jury and saw all the same evidence agrees.

Judge did poll the jury. Chauvin couldn't make eye contact as everyone declared him guilty

[TOP]

"I didn't know it would have been guilty on all counts, but I would have said guilty."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ut/7332593002/

[Concart]

That's your "insult"...not mine....

No that was you. You went right to demeaning this juror. Speaks volumes about your character.

[TOP]

No that was you. You went right to demeaning this juror. Speaks volumes about your character.

No, that was you....

[Concart]

No, that was you....

Why lie about something that’s so easily provable? You said

“Good thing she was dismissed” After speculating that she had prejudged the case. I guess we can add liar to the list of your abhorrent traits.