‘He was guilty.’ Extra juror in favor of Chauvin conviction

[TOP]

Why shouldn't she be on National TV? She was on the jury of a high profile case. Those individuals are interviewed all the time. Why would she have mentioned that during jury selection? Did she have a time machine so she could hear their testimony before she was placed on the jury? Finally, how do you manage to get out of bed in the morning without specific instructions? You seem completely incapable of an intelligent thought.

Why would she be? I wonder if she had prior knowledge of the videos/witnesses/the case?
I thought you said you've served on a jury before, so you would understand the selection process...now I'm not sure I believe you...

[TOP]

One more time, because you appear to be too stupid to understand the first time. THE BYSTANDERS TESTIFIED. THE VIDEO WAS SHOWN IN THE COURTROOM. Is it your intention to be an annoying as fuck troll? If so, mission accomplished. If you are attempting to say something intelligent.... not so much.

Good thing she was dismissed....Did she have prior knowledge of the case?
Did any of the jurors?

[Grumpy]

.

Good thing she was dismissed....Did she have prior knowledge of the case?
Did any of the jurors?

I may be splitting hairs ... but was she dismissed or just not used? Seems to me that dismissal would be for a cause.

[Concart]

Good thing she was dismissed....Did she have prior knowledge of the case?
Did any of the jurors?

She wasn’t dismissed. She was an alternate. Why do you keep asking the same stupid and entirely irrelevant question. She was accepted by both the prosecution and the defense. Why do you continue to insult these jurors?

[Concart]

Why would she be? I wonder if she had prior knowledge of the videos/witnesses/the case?
I thought you said you've served on a jury before, so you would understand the selection process...now I'm not sure I believe you...

Of course I understand the process. You don’t. You think the attorneys didn’t ask her? You are just mind numbingly stupid.

[Concart]

.


I may be splitting hairs ... but was she dismissed or just not used? Seems to me that dismissal would be for a cause.

That’s more than ‘splitting hairs’. She was an alternate. She was NOT dismissed.

[Grumpy]

.

That’s more than ‘splitting hairs’. She was an alternate. She was NOT dismissed.

Yeah, I knew she was an alternate ... and now I repeat what I said in post 15 ... "EVERYBODY WANTS TO GET IN THE ACT"

[TOP]

That’s more than ‘splitting hairs’. She was an alternate. She was NOT dismissed.

She was dismissed after closing arguments...one of two.... before deliberations....

[RB 60]

Alternates are nothing more than spectators. They have no interaction with the 12 jurors or judge whatsoever (unless the judge calls on them). None. Their opinion is meaningless. No more than another reporter's opinion who was at the trial. 15 minutes of fame...

[BidenPresident]

Alternates are nothing more than spectators. They have no interaction with the 12 jurors or judge whatsoever (unless the judge calls on them). None. Their opinion is meaningless. No more than another reporter's opinion who was at the trial. 15 minutes of fame...

Yes, three convictions of Chauvin, including murder.

[Concart]

She was dismissed after closing arguments...one of two.... before deliberations....

Because she was an alternate. That's not 'dismissed'. She was no longer needed. You haven't answered my question. Why do you keep insulting these jurors by suggesting that they acted inappropriately? I assume that's projection on your part.

[Concart]

Alternates are nothing more than spectators. They have no interaction with the 12 jurors or judge whatsoever (unless the judge calls on them). None. Their opinion is meaningless. No more than another reporter's opinion who was at the trial. 15 minutes of fame...

I guess the folks at CBS news disagreed with you. Just another juror who heard the evidence and would have convicted. Which tosses your 'intimidation' narrative out the window. Because it was always just laughably stupid.

[RB 60]

Yes, three convictions of Chauvin, including murder.

WTF?? Yeah, I heard of the verdict. What is your point?

[BidenPresident]

WTF?? Yeah, I heard of the verdict. What is your point?

My point is that what you said was worthless.

[RB 60]

I guess the folks at CBS news disagreed with you. Just another juror who heard the evidence and would have convicted. Which tosses your 'intimidation' narrative out the window. Because it was always just laughably stupid.

Let them. Then they were never a foreman on a jury in Federal court. I was. The alternates are meaningless unless called upon by the judge. Fact. Period.