A bullet dodged

[FUCK THE POLICE]

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/200...-bullet-dodged

A bullet dodged

What would have happened if George W. Bush had actually succeeded in his plan to privatize Social Security? Ask the Italians.

Italy did for retirement financing what President George W. Bush couldn’t do in the U.S.: It privatized part of its social security system. The timing couldn’t have been worse.

The global market meltdown has created losses for those who agreed to shift their contributions from a government severance payment plan to private funds meant to yield higher returns.

…

Gaetano Turchetta, a Rome office manager, made the irreversible move to a private plan after a union representative boasted of the potential for 20 percent annual returns. The 43- year-old father of three now says he would sign with “two hands and two feet” if he could switch back.

[Onceler]

Privatization of SS was one of the few things that Bush offered that I supported. Even with the recent meltdown, there would be a MUCH greater rate of return over the long haul for workers.

Most people younger than me, and even those in my generation, just assume that Social Security will not be there when we retire, anyway. For anyone who opposes privatization, I would love to hear the alternative.

[Epicurus]

Privatization of SS was one of the few things that Bush offered that I supported. Even with the recent meltdown, there would be a MUCH greater rate of return over the long haul for workers.

Most people younger than me, and even those in my generation, just assume that Social Security will not be there when we retire, anyway. For anyone who opposes privatization, I would love to hear the alternative.

Wow. I agree with Onceler.

[FUCK THE POLICE]

I supported it too.

But the simple fact is, SS isn't going to be all of your retirement plan. And it's guaranteed. The American people deserve some sense of security in retirement, no matter the economic conditions.

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Wow. I agree with Onceler.

Really? You agree with on of Oncie's more conservative opinions?

That's surprising.

[Damocles]

In Bush's plan the older workers closer to retirement would have been unable to move even a portion of their social security into the market.

Only you and I and all the other youngins who are far from retirement could have.

Also, only certain programs were possible to invest in and none of them were as risky as suggested by "award winning economist" Krugman.

[FUCK THE POLICE]

In Bush's plan the older workers closer to retirement would have been unable to move even a portion of their social security into the market.

Only you and I and all the other youngins who are far from retirement could have.

Also, only certain programs were possible to invest in and none of them were as risky as suggested by "award winning economist" Krugman.

That's nobel prize winning, Damo.

[Damocles]

That's nobel prize winning, Damo.

True

[Onceler]

I supported it too.

But the simple fact is, SS isn't going to be all of your retirement plan. And it's guaranteed. The American people deserve some sense of security in retirement, no matter the economic conditions.

I love the idea of social security, and the fact that we have it, but the fact is, we can't afford it. There is no viable plan for keeping SS workable in the long run.

Privatization would only be a disaster in a meltdown like this if people on the verge of retirement had suddenly had all of their SS investment "privatized," which isn't a part of any plan I would support (I'm not sure what Italy did to have it set up so that people actually incurred losses). Over time, the market's returns are basically guaranteed, and they are SO much better than the paltry returns with SS.

To me, it's kind of a no brainer. I just don't hear any other ideas.

[uscitizen]

Privatization of SS was one of the few things that Bush offered that I supported. Even with the recent meltdown, there would be a MUCH greater rate of return over the long haul for workers.

Most people younger than me, and even those in my generation, just assume that Social Security will not be there when we retire, anyway. For anyone who opposes privatization, I would love to hear the alternative.

Unless you needed you money during a downturn. But just wait till things get better...if you live that long....

[uscitizen]

In Bush's plan the older workers closer to retirement would have been unable to move even a portion of their social security into the market.

Only you and I and all the other youngins who are far from retirement could have.

Also, only certain programs were possible to invest in and none of them were as risky as suggested by "award winning economist" Krugman.

Umm correct me if I am wrong, but I do not remember there being an official Bush plan.
Just a bunch of rhetoric.

[Damocles]

Umm correct me if I am wrong, but I do not remember there being an official Bush plan.
Just a bunch of rhetoric.

You would be wrong.

It was, in fact, what he tried to spend the political capital from his "mandate" on.

Short memories in old people.

[uscitizen]

You would be wrong.

It was, in fact, what he tried to spend the political capital from his "mandate" on.

Short memories in old people.

Link to the official plan please.

Not speech or campaign statements, but a document.

yeah a good thing my memory gets shorter , keeps me from wanting to strangle 2X bush supporters so bad.

[Damocles]

It's on the White House website.

Why do I have to work because you have a crappy memory?

[uscitizen]

It's on the White House website.

Why do I have to work because you have a crappy memory?

Just because.

Why was it never submitted to congress when the repubs controlled everything?