Fox is claiming Biden said something inflammatory to influence the Jury...

[Jarod]

Can anyone find the offensive quote?


What did he say?

More untrue Biden bashing?

Should I pull up Trump quotes about pending trials he did not like?

[Underdog]

when he said he prayed for a guilty verdict, which could unduly influence the jury and had the verdict come back not guilty would have been used to justify rioting.


it was a poor choice of words he should have said he prayed justice will be served.

[Jarod]

when he said he prayed for a guilty verdict, which could unduly influence the jury and had the verdict come back not guilty would have been used to justify rioting.


it was a poor choice of words he should have said he prayed justice will be served.

He did not say that, liar.

[Underdog]

He did not say that, liar.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...verdict-483463



The honorable thing to do would be to apologize.


thnx.

[cancel2 2022]

Can anyone find the offensive quote?


What did he say?

More untrue Biden bashing?

Should I pull up Trump quotes about pending trials he did not like?

He shouldn't have said anything ffs, didn't you learn about the separation of powers?

[Trumpet]

He shouldn't have said anything ffs, didn't you learn about the separation of powers?

The Lord of Cretins is going to give us a lecture on legal matters, in this country.

[Cypress]

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...verdict-483463



The honorable thing to do would be to apologize.


thnx.

Your article says that Biden consciously waited until the jury was sequestered to avoid any perception of undue influence.

Your article:

Biden noted that he had waited until the Chauvin jury had been sequestered before making his own feelings about the criminal case public.

“I’m praying the verdict is the right verdict, which is — I think it’s overwhelming, in my view,” he told reporters in the Oval Office. “I wouldn’t say that unless the jury was sequestered now, not hearing me say that.”

[Nordberg]

Biden said nothing before the verdict. He did not taint the jury. This simply is a hoax thread.

[dukkha]

McCarthy said that Waters, who represents California, went to Minnesota "to interfere in its judicial system" in violation of a curfew. He argued that "her remarks can only be interpreted as an incitement to violence" and that she "ought to be under investigation."

Biden had also weighed in on the case before the verdict was announced, telling reporters that he was "praying that verdict is the right verdict" and that "I think it's overwhelming, in my view."

The president claimed that he only said this because the jury was already sequestered, but McCarthy argued that this "is no excuse" for making those remarks.

"He is a lawyer and former Senate Judiciary Committee chairman who well knows that sequestration does not make jurors impervious to prejudicial publicity," McCarthy wrote. "And if he’s been following the case as he claims to have been, he knows trial judge Peter Cahill has pleaded that public officials stop commenting on the trial — under circumstances where, even before the Bidens and Waters piped up, there was already substantial reason to doubt that Chauvin could get a fair trial in Minneapolis."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/max...omments-appeal

[dukkha]

He shouldn't have said anything ffs, didn't you learn about the separation of powers?

#STFU Biden

[Underdog]

Biden said nothing before the verdict. He did not taint the jury. This simply is a hoax thread.

Why do you lie so easily?


President Joe Biden said Tuesday he was “praying” for a guilty verdict in the trial of Derek Chauvin, as the jury continues its second day of deliberations over the fate of the former Minneapolis police officer who killed George Floyd.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...verdict-483463

[Underdog]

Your article says that Biden consciously waited until the jury was sequestered to avoid any perception of undue influence.

Your article:

The rioters were not sequestered.

[Cypress]

The rioters were not sequestered.

I accept you tacit and belated confession that Biden deliberately avoided influencing the jury.

This was the question posed in the thread title >>

"Fox is claiming Biden said something inflammatory to influence the Jury..."

[Jarod]

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...verdict-483463



The honorable thing to do would be to apologize.


thnx.

Your link does not say what you claim. I can only assume that is intentional?

Ill accept your apology once it is offered.

[Jarod]

He shouldn't have said anything ffs, didn't you learn about the separation of powers?

I think its okay for him to say whatever he wants after the jury is sequestered, but what did he say that you find offensive?