He's guilty

[Sailor]

He favored the defense the entire time. He made sure there would be no grounds for appeal.

You might want to read up on what he said about Waters and politicians in general sticking their noses into this trial.

[Althea]

Revenge is revenge and justice is justice.
Revenge isn't the state's function.
I know all about going Sicilian more than most, but that's not what the law is about,

You said that he might actually prefer the death sentence. My suggestion is less torturous than the cocktails they use in capital cases.

[archives]

I was regularly startled to see anyone who would opine on Chauvin's innocence without seeing all the video evidence available.

I don't think they value their credibility very much to risk it so casually by going out on a limb and defending someone who even allegedly could be found guilty of murder without seeing all the evidence.

Makes no sense to me unless they just wanted to get some practice fighting in an unpopular cause.

And that's a natural thing that someone who is learning and growing would do. They would challenge themselves by fighting a losing battle. They test themselves to better gauge their own abilities. And to become stronger and more formidable in debate.

]

Not sure what all that means, but as I noted, the video told the story, the defenses only route was looking for technicalities that might create doubt but it was next to impossible to discredit that which anyone could see on the film

[Althea]

You might want to read up on what he said about Waters and politicians in general sticking their noses into this trial.

I watched it on recording. He dismissed the claim, but was angry about ALL politicians who weighed in.

There was just as much pro Chauvin crap on t.v.. If you think the jurors were worried about Waters, Nelson thanks you.

[Drummie123]

Looting tonight

I agree.

[Legion]

You might want to read up on what he said about Waters and politicians in general sticking their noses into this trial.

What he said made no difference. He refused to declare a mistrial. Can you blame him?

[domer76]

No similarities whatsoever.

No threats to burn cities to the ground in the OJ trial. And, nothing happened.

The jurors here were terrified for their lives, evidence be damned. That is clear after seeing the evidence.

You don’t know from shit that the jurors were terrified. The evidence was overwhelming.

Clown

[Legion]

There was just as much pro Chauvin crap on t.v..

Is that so?

LINK

[BidenPresident]

You don’t know from shit that the jurors were terrified. The evidence was overwhelming.

Clown

Right wing racists cannot understand the concept of justice.

[TTQ64]

He favored the defense the entire time. He made sure there would be no grounds for appeal.

he repeated right wing talking points about maxine waters.........

sailor is a right wing punk

[Sailor]

I watched it on recording. He dismissed the claim, but was angry about ALL politicians who weighed in.

There was just as much pro Chauvin crap on t.v.. If you think the jurors were worried about Waters, Nelson thanks you.

Not "all" politicians. Waters in particular. He made that quite clear. I am surprised CNN actually reported it. "

(CNN)The judge overseeing former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin's trial in the death of George Floyd said Monday that Rep. Maxine Waters' comments could be grounds for appealing a verdict in the trial.
"I'll give you that Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned," Judge Peter Cahill told defense attorney Eric Nelson on Monday.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/19/polit...eal/index.html

[NiftyNiblick]

You said that he might actually prefer the death sentence. My suggestion is less torturous than the cocktails they use in capital cases.

Judicial lethal injection is punitive execution, not humane euthanasia.
Judicial lethal injection is not a humane process.

I believe only in humane euthanasia,
the way we put down pets when their quality of life is done.

It's civil exclusion either way--the offender is excluded from our midst--but starkly different in many, many ways.

[archives]

What he said made no difference. He refused to declare a mistrial. Can you blame him?

Now tell us there “copy,” how many times has a sitting Judge suddenly declared a mistrial on his own case for events that aren’t occurring in the Court room?

[Sailor]

What he said made no difference. He refused to declare a mistrial. Can you blame him?

He was not talking about a mistrial. He was talking about the appeals court overturning it.

[TTQ64]

Yes

wrong answer...............they murder blacks off camera all the time.

that means you all will take the kops word for it...........thats not change.