He's guilty

[]2epo]v[an]

Btw, you're all fools. Especially you legion. This is a city that just got ass fucked by its own da who wouldnt bother to check tge domestic spy lab to learn about the whole scheme/knew it and was part of it.

[]2epo]v[an]

Dude gets a five year max with all his junky buddies, saves his junky life, and gets a big cash reward. Meanwhile, a whole junky city that just assfked itself for months just assfucked itself for the rest of history.

You can hide this bullshit from your own lower life form asses but history will remember. This whole age is going to be a data miner archeologist's field day one day not very far away.

[]2epo]v[an]

They will be baffled by how so many people could have so little dignity and so much pride.

[]2epo]v[an]

But on the bright side there wont be very many of them so, pfft, w/e. Hey great great great great great great great (ad nausium) grand kid!

[Drummie123]

dont ever try to say you think, we all know better

You all know my hairy ass with your lips and know you deserve nothing better.

[Drummie123]

Oh, never look at FOX. Thanks anyway.

Let's see if this makes sense.

You need, (for some unknown reason) to carry out a continuous job of promoting a Leftist agenda online and consuming any news or political views from the Right only makes it more emotionally difficult to continue lying when you know the other side of the story.

So, you keep yourself from knowing any of the RW opinions or view points. And that is exactly why there are still Liberals who haven't #WalkedAway from the DNC. Because they never see the perspectives from the other side of the political fence.

Because they never consume anything close to unbiased or honest news. When it comes to advancing their Leftist narrative, the dishonest media has gotten away with being dishonest for so long, they think they can do it indefinitely without negative consequences.

They will eventually start seeing the price they pay.

But by then it will be too late to avoid the pain.

[Hawkeye10]

[Althea]

Judicial lethal injection is punitive execution, not humane euthanasia.
Judicial lethal injection is not a humane process.

I believe only in humane euthanasia,
the way we put down pets when their quality of life is done.

It's civil exclusion either way--the offender is excluded from our midst--but starkly different in many, many ways.

I only believe in the death penalty for the slam dunk cases. Every week there's a mass shooter. In the event that they don't kill themselves, the state should kill them. I don't care about humane methods.

These few who should be put to death don't deserve humanity. Their method of execution should be commensurate with their methods of execution.
Agree about Chauvin. I don't think he deserves the death penalty. You suggested that he might opt for death. I merely offered him my free advice on the method.

[blackascoal]

I know you are a racist dipshit.

..... and a truly dumb one at that.

[Althea]

Verdict by extortion.

The elephant in the room no one is brave enough to acknowledge. The jurors were scared out of their minds. You know they were.

That's funny. Where did you see that? Scared out of their minds. I can't stop laughing.

[Althea]

The mob "won" a verdict by intimidation, not based on the evidence.

That is called a miscarriage of justice.

Some "win" little fascist. :-)

Do tell.

[]2epo]v[an]

Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

A dumbass can only learn from a perfect teacher but any teacher can learn from a perfect dumbass.

[ExpressLane]

this case is nothing like the OJ case...............video evidence being the primary difference............now, unless you wish to classify most of the population as retarded trolls, you lose

The evidence against OJ was overwhelming the evidence against Chauvin was overwhelming. The main difference is blacks wanted OJ freed and Chauvin convicted.

[ExpressLane]

Why not?

They could have easily done it if they all agreed at every point


It appears that is what happened

Juries typically first review the evidence completely THEN take a vote. You can't do that in ten hours. Personally I think they were intimidated and wanted to vote and get out of the situation.

[ExpressLane]

I would think he would be saying whatever his most severe symptom was or the thing that might be most persuasive in those moments as his life is draining from him.

If it was me, after the first ten times telling him I couldn't breathe, I would throw all caution to the wind and not worry about possibly 'making him mad.' I wouldn't feel I had anything to lose at some point.

If he seemed unmoved by cries of "I can't breathe," I might have wanted to try: 'Officer, this is the BIG one. I'm having a heart attack. My chest pains are bad.' 'You are going to kill me.' 'You will get life in prison, mother fucker.' 'Is killing me worth the pain your family will go through?' 'You won't get away with killing me, ass wipe!'

Again shortness of breath is a common symptom in a MI. But if he had a MI his heart would have shown in on autopsy. The autopsy showed heart disease but no signs of acute MI.