Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 139

Thread: Who killed Ashli Babbitt?

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Watch the video. There were Capitol Police standing right next to and behind Ashli when she was shot. Funny thing is they did not seem to think there was a real problem at all.
    None of them shot her, did they?

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    35,009
    Thanks
    12,445
    Thanked 20,810 Times in 14,535 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 507 Times in 486 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    The cop was ‘cleared’ I assumed there were actual details in the report.
    No published report on the findings Darth. Those are "secret" also. This whole fucking thing stinks.
    Consider the Oyster.

    C-4 is just angry playdoh.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Sailor For This Post:

    Darth Omar (04-19-2021)

  4. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    45,231
    Thanks
    13,130
    Thanked 29,605 Times in 19,421 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,237 Times in 1,170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Consistency is not what is needed here.

    Proportionality is what is needed.

    Officers who protect Congress also protect the national security secrets they are privy to.

    If that Capitol Police Officer's identity was released to the public, someone could use the threat of harming him or his family as leverage against him to allow them access to a particular member for some nefarious purpose.

    It's common sense.

    C'mon man!
    Certainly interesting lol.

    Not too sure about the common sense part. So going forward, we can expect the cops name from being released in future incidents?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  5. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    35,009
    Thanks
    12,445
    Thanked 20,810 Times in 14,535 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 507 Times in 486 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    None of them shot her, did they?
    No. Not at all. They did not even seem alarmed at what was occurring in front of them.
    Consider the Oyster.

    C-4 is just angry playdoh.

  6. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Hey, 60 Minutes, maybe you can try telling a real story instead of making one up to serve the DEMOCRAT narrative.

    I know a good one.

    Who killed Ashli Babbitt, Mike Wallace wannabes?

  7. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Certainly interesting lol. Not too sure about the common sense part. So going forward, we can expect the cops name from being released in future incidents?
    Haven't you heard? According to an April 1st, 2016 article in the Washington Post, "1 in 5 officers involved in fatal shootings names go undisclosed."

    Except that the name of the first officer mentioned by the Washington Post on April 1st, 2016 is known.

    Christopher Raimey.

  8. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    35,009
    Thanks
    12,445
    Thanked 20,810 Times in 14,535 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 507 Times in 486 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Hey, 60 Minutes, maybe you can try telling a real story instead of making one up to serve the DEMOCRAT narrative.

    I know a good one.

    Who killed Ashli Babbitt, Mike Wallace wannabes?
    60 Minutes went from an upstanding, real journalistic media source to a partisan bunch of hack amateurs. At best.
    Consider the Oyster.

    C-4 is just angry playdoh.

  9. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    60 Minutes went from an upstanding, real journalistic media source to a partisan bunch of hack amateurs. At best.
    They don’t want to tell you who shot Ashlii because the garbage media is totally dedicated to supporting the leftist narrative.

    And if that means covering up for an apparently unjustified police shooting because the victim isn’t one of the chosen – then so be it.

  10. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    32,456
    Thanks
    201
    Thanked 13,988 Times in 9,743 Posts
    Groans
    4,011
    Groaned 3,207 Times in 2,980 Posts

    Default

    The cops were terrified. Their job was to protect the nation's capitol and Babbit was leading a group crashing through the doors. She was unlucky. It could have been any of the seditionists. 140 cops were injured by the rioters. They had a right to be scared. They could have shot them all. They were trying to stop the functioning of Congress. The stupid part was counting the electoral ballots is a formality. The votes were already certified.

  11. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    35,009
    Thanks
    12,445
    Thanked 20,810 Times in 14,535 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 507 Times in 486 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    They don’t want to tell you who shot Ashlii because the garbage media is totally dedicated to supporting the leftist narrative.

    And if that means covering up for an apparently unjustified police shooting because the victim isn’t one of the chosen – then so be it.
    Exactly. Same with rioting, looting, burning down innocent businesses, etc, etc. democrats have a long history of protecting murderers when it fits their political narrative.
    Consider the Oyster.

    C-4 is just angry playdoh.

  12. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    20,616
    Thanks
    7,126
    Thanked 9,074 Times in 5,998 Posts
    Groans
    2,006
    Groaned 1,466 Times in 1,354 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Certainly interesting lol.

    Not too sure about the common sense part. So going forward, we can expect the cops name from being released in future incidents?
    You're still trying to equate local law enforcement with a police force whose job it is to protect those who hold the highest level national security secrets in their possession.

    It's just a case of two different levels of concern.

    I know what supposed point you're trying to get at.... that the Capitol cop who shot your Trumptard anti-Biden hero has their identity protected while some cop who kills a street thug had his name dragged through the press.

    Like I said.... proportionality.

    Also, if the investigation had determined that the Capitol cop killed her did so in an unjustified or illegal manner, then his/her name would be public knowledge by now.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Nomad For This Post:

    Trumpet (04-19-2021)

  14. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    16,725
    Thanks
    20,273
    Thanked 6,257 Times in 4,496 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 2,004 Times in 1,890 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Exactly. Same with rioting, looting, burning down innocent businesses, etc, etc. democrats have a long history of protecting murderers when it fits their political narrative.


    OMG
    QRP and 73 to everybody

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Trumpet For This Post:

    Nomad (04-19-2021)

  16. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    45,231
    Thanks
    13,130
    Thanked 29,605 Times in 19,421 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,237 Times in 1,170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    You're still trying to equate local law enforcement with a police force whose job it is to protect those who hold the highest level national security secrets in their possession.

    It's just a case of two different levels of concern.

    I know what supposed point you're trying to get at.... that the Capitol cop who shot your Trumptard anti-Biden hero has their identity protected while some cop who kills a street thug had his name dragged through the press.

    Like I said.... proportionality.

    Also, if the investigation had determined that the Capitol cop killed her did so in an unjustified or illegal manner, then his/her name would be public knowledge by now.
    It *appeared* to be unjust just like Chauvin *appeared* to kill Floyd with his knee. When things appear to be amiss the public deserves a better explanation than Ďthe Officer was clearedí.

    Those congressmen work for the people and not the other way around. And the better lot of them are hypocrites that would defund cops in poor urban areas even as they hide behind a barricade guarded by the military.

    As protection from rioters. Let that sink in.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  17. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Exactly. Same with rioting, looting, burning down innocent businesses, etc, etc. democrats have a long history of protecting murderers when it fits their political narrative.
    Indeed.

    DEMOCRATS pardoned or commuted the sentences of several terrorists who not only "stormed" the US Capitol building, but set off a bomb and shot members of the House inside the building.

  18. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    45,231
    Thanks
    13,130
    Thanked 29,605 Times in 19,421 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,237 Times in 1,170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Watch the video. There were Capitol Police standing right next to and behind Ashli when she was shot. Funny thing is they did not seem to think there was a real problem at all.
    My thoughts exactly.

    That was a risky shot under the circumstances. Had Babbit been *an immediate* threat to someone you might take a shot like thatóbut she was climbing through a fricking window. Iíll guarantee the cops standing next to her had something to say about it.

    But no mention of a reprimand Ďin the reportí.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Sailor (04-20-2021)

Similar Threads

  1. Ashli Babbitt legal team will be on Tucker tuesday march 9
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-08-2021, 08:00 PM
  2. 46 days and we still don't know who killed Ashli Babbitt in the Jan 6 capitol riot
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 03-01-2021, 10:17 AM
  3. Ashli Babbitt killer will not be charged. NOT EVEN IDENTIFIED!!!!
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 144
    Last Post: 02-13-2021, 01:00 AM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-19-2021, 08:44 AM
  5. Who was insurrectionist Ashli Babbitt ?
    By moon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2021, 06:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •