Will Chauvin win a reversal on appeal?

[Legion]

I'M CONFIDENT THAT NONE OF THESE JURISTS ARE SUICIDAL

How does a case get to the Court of Appeals?

• Appellant files appeal after district court judgment
• District court forwards case files to the Court of Appeals
• Appellant and respondent file briefs
• Three-judge panel hears oral arguments
• Court of Appeals issues opinion
• Parties may petition Supreme Court for further review

What is the standard of review?

The standard of review defines the manner in which each issue is reviewed, delineates the boundaries of appellate argument, and often determines the outcome on appeal. When deciding a case, the first task of an appellate court is to identify the applicable standard of review. The Minnesota Court of Appeals conscientiously identifies and applies a specific standard of review to each issue before the court.

What happens during oral arguments?

Marshal calls court to order; audience stands. During oral arguments, the marshal maintains courtroom decorum and ensures that attorneys adhere to time limitations.

• Three judges enter the courtroom. Court of Appeals cases are heard in three-judge panels. Before oral arguments, judges have prepared by reading “briefs,” or written arguments submitted by the parties involved. The judges sit in order of seniority, with the presiding judge in the middle.
• Appellant’s attorney argues the case. The attorney representing the appealing party also answers judges’ questions about his/her legal argument. Fifteen minutes are allotted.
• Respondent's attorney argues the case. Respondent's attorney also answers judges' questions. Fifteen minutes are allotted.
• Appellant's attorney has five minutes to respond. This is called "rebuttal."
• Judges confer and decide the outcome of the case. One judge is assigned to draft the Court’s “opinion” or decision.
• Judges draft and revise the opinion. The draft opinion is circulated among the members of the three-judge panel. A judge on the panel may also write a “concurring opinion” – agreeing with the decision but for different reasons – or a “dissenting opinion” – disagreeing with the majority opinion. Once the judges agree on a final draft, the opinion is circulated to the entire Court of Appeals for comments.
• The final opinion is filed with Clerk of Appellate Courts. The opinion is also released to public via the Judicial Branch Website. The Court of Appeals releases its opinion within 90 days of oral arguments.

https://www.mncourts.gov/courtofappeals.aspx

[MAGA MAN]

Of course he will, thanks to Mad Max, and now Sleepy Joe.

[Hawkeye10]

Hell No.

Our justice system is shit in part because the quality of our judges has been declining for decades, they will not stick their necks out here.

[Legion]

Of course he will, thanks to Mad Max, and now Sleepy Joe.

I don't think anyone would dare to overturn the verdict that the woke mob demanded and got through intimidation and terroristic demonstrations.

[Legion]

Derek Chauvin was charged with second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter.

He was found guilty on all counts today.

Should the trial have been moved to a different venue? We had elected officials including the alleged president of the United States weighing in on the matter.

Did the former officer get a fair trial?

Can he win on appeal?

Discuss.

[Concart]

Hell No.

Our justice system is shit in part because the quality of our judges has been declining for decades, they will not stick their necks out here.

Here's a thought... there are no grounds for reversal on appeal. See how easy that was?

[Jarod]

Maybe Trump will get reinstated and then pardon the guy!

[Hawkeye10]

Here's a thought... there are no grounds for reversal on appeal. See how easy that was?

Here is a thought....America has broken down enough already that truth and facts largely do not matter.....The Revolution does not believe in truth.....Only Power.

Also the people are increasingly incapable of thinking for themselves even if they got a wild hair and decided to give it a try.

[Concart]

Here is a thought....America has broken down enough already that truth and facts largely do not matter.....The Revolution does not believe in truth.....Only Power.

So all the jurors were part of The Revolution? LOL at you. There is nothing to appeal. They'll try. They'll lose. You can't retry the facts.

[volsrock]

So all the jurors were part of The Revolution? LOL at you. There is nothing to appeal. They'll try. They'll lose. You can't retry the facts.

tell us again how Sicknick was murdered

the same people that say Chauvin is guilty say Sicknick was murdered

[Hawkeye10]

If SCOTUS will not stick their necks out to do the right thing then the lower courts will not either ....Keep this in Mind as you manage your expectations of our now largely crap judges.

[Life is Golden]

So all the jurors were part of The Revolution? LOL at you. There is nothing to appeal. They'll try. They'll lose. You can't retry the facts.

The "verdict" wasn't based on the facts. There was a full picture the media never showed. If you watched the trial, you'd know that.

The jurors were in fear.

[Hawkeye10]

The "verdict" wasn't based on the facts. There was a full picture the media never showed. If you watched the trial, you'd know that.

The jurors were in fear.

The jurors had been placed into fear by the Revolution.....Fear and intimidation are what this Revolution trades in, all Revolutions do.

[Legion]

Trump

.

[Hawkeye10]

Tucker just showed this Judge dressing down Waters et al.....THAT was cool....I would love to see more of THAT.