Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Big fat lies about Georgia's election integrity law

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Big fat lies about Georgia's election integrity law



    Lie 1: The Georgia election law discourages voting/suppresses votes.

    The Truth: Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, said, “Overall, the Georgia law is pretty much in the mainstream and is not regressive or restrictive. The availability of absentee ballots and early voting is a lot more progressive than what’s in the blue states.” The Heritage Foundation recently validated this statement by comparing Georgia’s law to other states.

    Despite bungler Biden’s and other’s false claims that the time period for voting would be restricted, it is not the case that voting must finish at 5 p.m. Counties can set hours anywhere between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. (see line 1446-1447 of the law).


    https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legisla...0212022/201121

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default




    Big fat lie 2: The Georgia law suppresses the black vote.

    The Truth: The law makes no distinctions based on race. False comparisons to DEMOCRAT Jim Crow laws—which included segregation, poll taxes, grandfather clauses, and literacy tests—are historically ignorant and diminish the outrages committed by racist DEMOCRATS.

    Leftists lie that the law ends early voting on Sundays. In factn the bill allows for early voting on Sundays (see line 83 of the law).


    https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legisla...0212022/201121

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default


    Big fat lie 3: The Georgia election law contains onerous voter ID requirements.

    The Truth: The Georgia law’s voter ID language is not onerous, and makes exceptions for people without ID to provide their Social Security number (line 1244 of the law).

    https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legisla...0212022/201121

    Furthermore, ID requirements do not suppress voters, as studies have shown. Patronizing claims that minorities are too stupid to have identification are insulting and have no factual basis.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    748
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 205 Times in 162 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    .
    I am happy that you had no more "Big fat lies" ... My eyeballs can't handle another pix

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Grumpy For This Post:

    Grokmaster (04-18-2021)

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy View Post
    I am happy that you had no more "Big fat lies" ... My eyeballs can't handle another pix





    Big fat lie 4: The bill denies water to voters \waiting in line.

    The Truth: Voters are allowed to bring water with them. The law allows voters to drink water from a fountain (see line 1828 of the law).

    https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legisla...0212022/201121

    The law protects voters from political solicitation within 150 feet of a voting site (see line 1818 of the law).

    https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legisla...0212022/201121

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    748
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 205 Times in 162 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    OK ... OK ... I promise to NEVER accuse you of being a nice guy

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Grumpy For This Post:

    Grokmaster (04-18-2021)

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    102,280
    Thanks
    7,750
    Thanked 29,098 Times in 23,192 Posts
    Groans
    2,583
    Groaned 2,300 Times in 2,190 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    her hands must be stained with fake-ballot ink......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Grokmaster (04-18-2021)

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    her hands must be stained with fake-ballot ink......
    Plausible.

    Or barbecue sauce.

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    3,119
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 952 Times in 695 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 163 Times in 150 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post


    Lie 1: The Georgia election law discourages voting/suppresses votes.

    The Truth: Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, said, “Overall, the Georgia law is pretty much in the mainstream and is not regressive or restrictive. The availability of absentee ballots and early voting is a lot more progressive than what’s in the blue states.” The Heritage Foundation recently validated this statement by comparing Georgia’s law to other states.

    Despite bungler Biden’s and other’s false claims that the time period for voting would be restricted, it is not the case that voting must finish at 5 p.m. Counties can set hours anywhere between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. (see line 1446-1447 of the law).


    https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legisla...0212022/201121
    tRump and other seditious and treasonous GOPers and including Ms. Lindsey should be prosecuted for waging war against the Constitutionally compliant Georgia electoral process, and the GOP should be condemned at coming up with un Constitutional laws to obstruct the right of voters. I also hope Stacy Adams will become Georgia's unobstructed governor who was un Constitutionally denied as a result of GOPer treason at destroying the legitimacy of that gubernatorial election as a result of violating the will of the majority voter and regardless of who they were.

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gemini104104 View Post
    tRump


  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    28,006
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 13,233 Times in 8,433 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,322 Times in 2,153 Posts

    Default

    “copy and paste’s” post are so obvious, was it really necessary to include the overblown often derogatory pictures with any of those narratives

    In fact your source in all of them is the actual law, from which then you offered your own interpretation, or that of someone you didn’t want to cite, and last I knew pictures weren’t included in Legislative proposals

    You forgot the most important part, all of those provisions now are subject to oversight by local election officials, not a State wide elected position as was the case prior to these changes, but officials appointed by State Legislators, meaning political partisans. Pretty obvious they don’t want another Raffensperger messing up their plans with honesty. The local Billy Bob Joe wouldn’t hesitate for a moment coming up with those requested twelve thousand votes

    And lastly, simple question, why does Georgia now suddenly need election “reform” after they just conducted an election that was examined from all different angles and even declared by State Election officials and the Governor to be their best in history?

    Get ready for one of “copy’s” corny copy and paste cartoon clips in reply

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    45,810
    Thanks
    11,753
    Thanked 19,145 Times in 13,422 Posts
    Groans
    241
    Groaned 1,827 Times in 1,741 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    “copy and paste’s” post are so obvious, was it really necessary to include the overblown often derogatory pictures with any of those narratives

    In fact your source in all of them is the actual law, from which then you offered your own interpretation, or that of someone you didn’t want to cite, and last I knew pictures weren’t included in Legislative proposals

    You forgot the most important part, all of those provisions now are subject to oversight by local election officials, not a State wide elected position as was the case prior to these changes, but officials appointed by State Legislators, meaning political partisans. Pretty obvious they don’t want another Raffensperger messing up their plans with honesty. The local Billy Bob Joe wouldn’t hesitate for a moment coming up with those requested twelve thousand votes

    And lastly, simple question, why does Georgia now suddenly need election “reform” after they just conducted an election that was examined from all different angles and even declared by State Election officials and the Governor to be their best in history?

    Get ready for one of “copy’s” corny copy and paste cartoon clips in reply
    you sure about that?
    I thought the electors were still elected, but the State Legislature could remove and appoint for cause

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    76,485
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    you sure about that? I thought the electors were still elected, but the State Legislature could remove and appoint for cause
    Anchovies wasn't talking about electors.

  17. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    10,220
    Thanks
    4,180
    Thanked 5,083 Times in 3,486 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 231 Times in 214 Posts

    Default

    Hide the ham hocks! Big Stacy is on the loose and she IS HUNGRY!

  18. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    748
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 205 Times in 162 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    .
    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    In fact your source in all of them is the actual law, from which then you offered your own interpretation
    .
    wow ... whoda thunk that someone would actually do that on political board ... wow

    THERE'S GOTTA BE A RULE SOMEWHERE ABOUT THAT ... WHERE ARE THE MOD'S

Similar Threads

  1. Facing possible defeat, Trump threatens the integrity of the election
    By jacksonsprat22 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-26-2020, 09:40 PM
  2. Is there new hope that we can preserve election integrity?
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-08-2020, 05:59 AM
  3. Why e-voting isn't a good idea if you value election integrity
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-06-2020, 02:13 PM
  4. russian twitter trolls trashed election integrity with dumpy
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-13-2018, 09:44 AM
  5. show SOME concern for election integrity or be labeled
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-18-2016, 11:03 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •