Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 76

Thread: Oath keepers pleads guilty for 6th

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    NC originally from NYC
    Posts
    18,725
    Thanks
    58,022
    Thanked 9,300 Times in 6,004 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 1,166 Times in 1,098 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post


    Maybe you will show up on their data base
    Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. Albert Einstein

    America's future is bright, not white

    And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment


    ברוך השם

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to guno For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (04-16-2021)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    NC originally from NYC
    Posts
    18,725
    Thanks
    58,022
    Thanked 9,300 Times in 6,004 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 1,166 Times in 1,098 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    MORE MADEUP BULLSHIT...LIKE EVERY SYLLABLE REGARDING TRUMP RUSSIA...


    THE PROSECUTION IS FALLING ON ITS FACE = WHY THEY ARE OFFERING DEALS.
    your name might show on on their data base

    Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. Albert Einstein

    America's future is bright, not white

    And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment


    ברוך השם

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to guno For This Post:

    evince (04-16-2021)

  5. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    17,551
    Thanks
    9,599
    Thanked 9,088 Times in 6,255 Posts
    Groans
    179
    Groaned 321 Times in 315 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Prosecutors struggle with consistent story in Jan. 6 cases



    BOSTON (AP) — There’s little doubt the Oath Keepers were planning for something on Jan. 6. The question at the heart of the criminal case against its members and associates in the attack on the U.S. Capitol is: What, exactly, did they intend to do?


    Authorities suggested for weeks in court hearings and papers that members of the far-right militia group plotted their attack in advance in an effort to block the peaceful transition of power. But prosecutors have since said it is not clear whether the group was targeting the Capitol before Jan. 6.


    “The plan was to unlawfully stop the certification of the Electoral College vote ... and the plan was to be prepared to use violence if necessary,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathryn Rakoczy said during a hearing this month. But the Oath Keepers “did not know precisely the way in which force and violence might be needed to support this plan,” she said.

    But as the sprawling investigation has unfolded, prosecutors have sometimes struggled to maintain a consistent narrative and had to walk back statements made in court hearings or in papers. It has created an opening for defense attorneys to try to sow doubt in the case.

    “The government presented a theory (without evidence) that there was a weeks long plan to invade the Capitol,” an attorney for one of the Oath Keepers, Jessica Watkins, wrote in a recent court filing. “There was no such plan.”

    In one case, prosecutors declared in court documents in January there was “strong evidence” the pro-Trump mob aimed to “capture and assassinate elected officials." The Justice Department quickly clarified it had no such evidence, blaming it on a miscommunication between prosecutors.

    After she was pressed by a judge in a recent hearing, Rakoczy conceded authorities “do not have at this point someone explicitly saying, ‘our plan is to force entry into the Capitol in order to stop the certification,’” but cautioned that the investigation is ongoing.



    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...?ocid=msedgntp




    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    10,246
    Thanks
    4,188
    Thanked 5,092 Times in 3,491 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 231 Times in 214 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by guno View Post
    Maybe you will show up on their data base

  7. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    134,364
    Thanks
    40,415
    Thanked 22,544 Times in 17,502 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 18,879 Times in 17,489 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

  8. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    134,364
    Thanks
    40,415
    Thanked 22,544 Times in 17,502 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 18,879 Times in 17,489 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Prosecutors struggle with consistent story in Jan. 6 cases



    BOSTON (AP) — There’s little doubt the Oath Keepers were planning for something on Jan. 6. The question at the heart of the criminal case against its members and associates in the attack on the U.S. Capitol is: What, exactly, did they intend to do?


    Authorities suggested for weeks in court hearings and papers that members of the far-right militia group plotted their attack in advance in an effort to block the peaceful transition of power. But prosecutors have since said it is not clear whether the group was targeting the Capitol before Jan. 6.


    “The plan was to unlawfully stop the certification of the Electoral College vote ... and the plan was to be prepared to use violence if necessary,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathryn Rakoczy said during a hearing this month. But the Oath Keepers “did not know precisely the way in which force and violence might be needed to support this plan,” she said.

    But as the sprawling investigation has unfolded, prosecutors have sometimes struggled to maintain a consistent narrative and had to walk back statements made in court hearings or in papers. It has created an opening for defense attorneys to try to sow doubt in the case.

    “The government presented a theory (without evidence) that there was a weeks long plan to invade the Capitol,” an attorney for one of the Oath Keepers, Jessica Watkins, wrote in a recent court filing. “There was no such plan.”

    In one case, prosecutors declared in court documents in January there was “strong evidence” the pro-Trump mob aimed to “capture and assassinate elected officials." The Justice Department quickly clarified it had no such evidence, blaming it on a miscommunication between prosecutors.

    After she was pressed by a judge in a recent hearing, Rakoczy conceded authorities “do not have at this point someone explicitly saying, ‘our plan is to force entry into the Capitol in order to stop the certification,’” but cautioned that the investigation is ongoing.



    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...?ocid=msedgntp











    ERROR IS ALL YOUR LINK PROVIDES

  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    134,364
    Thanks
    40,415
    Thanked 22,544 Times in 17,502 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 18,879 Times in 17,489 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    guno (04-16-2021)

  11. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    32,507
    Thanks
    201
    Thanked 14,013 Times in 9,757 Posts
    Groans
    4,017
    Groaned 3,212 Times in 2,985 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    From who?
    You? Angry gun nuts and Trump suckups might. The Qs would approve too.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    guno (04-16-2021)

  13. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    9,352
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 4,731 Times in 3,380 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 162 Times in 151 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    You? Angry gun nuts and Trump suckups might. The Qs would approve too.
    He's going to be threatened by these guys in prison? Yea, sure...

  14. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    25,325
    Thanks
    16,494
    Thanked 13,152 Times in 9,031 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,154 Times in 4,465 Posts

    Default

    Hello T. A. Gardner,

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    From who?
    Everybody he informs on.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    guno (04-16-2021)

  16. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    68,605
    Thanks
    5,530
    Thanked 20,803 Times in 13,519 Posts
    Groans
    250
    Groaned 3,554 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    First to squeal gets the best deal!
    Last edited by Jarod; 04-16-2021 at 03:55 PM.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    evince (04-16-2021), guno (04-16-2021), PoliTalker (04-16-2021)

  18. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    68,605
    Thanks
    5,530
    Thanked 20,803 Times in 13,519 Posts
    Groans
    250
    Groaned 3,554 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    That’s a pretty good size sentence, I bet the other defendants are shitting in their pants right about now.

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    evince (04-16-2021), guno (04-16-2021)

  20. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    25,325
    Thanks
    16,494
    Thanked 13,152 Times in 9,031 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,154 Times in 4,465 Posts

    Default

    Hello Jarod,

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    That’s a pretty good size sentence, I bet the other defendants are shitting in their pants right about now.
    Better there than the capitol floor.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    evince (04-16-2021), ThatOwlWoman (04-16-2021)

  22. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    32,507
    Thanks
    201
    Thanked 14,013 Times in 9,757 Posts
    Groans
    4,017
    Groaned 3,212 Times in 2,985 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    He's going to be threatened by these guys in prison? Yea, sure...
    They are not all there. Lots of you far rightys are running free.

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    guno (04-16-2021)

  24. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    38,130
    Thanks
    11,208
    Thanked 16,702 Times in 12,953 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 2,097 Times in 2,055 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Yeap


    Imagine what identity they will give him
    California liberal living in La Jolla and working for an abortion clinic. STY, et al., will never find him there.
    Stripping Americans of their rights, regardless if inalienable or unenumerated, is against American ideals

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to Dutch Uncle For This Post:

    evince (04-16-2021)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-16-2021, 11:54 AM
  2. 2010:oath keepers in the military
    By evince in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-14-2021, 02:52 AM
  3. Proud Boys and Oath Keepers can't be staging insurrections from prison
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-13-2021, 06:26 AM
  4. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-18-2021, 12:18 PM
  5. They are oath keepers
    By Legion Troll in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-12-2015, 06:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •