Far Left Liberal San Fran Considers Taxing People Entering The City

[KingCondanomation]

"Officials in San Francisco are considering a plan to ease traffic by charging drivers a fee upon entering notoriously clogged sections of the city.

Using $1 million in federal funds, the San Francisco County Transportation Authority is studying various “congestion pricing” options. If approved, such pricing would make San Francisco the first American city to charge cars a fee to enter certain neighborhoods at certain times. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/us/04congestion.html

And we all know how Liberal Democrats work, once one does it, then the rest try and keep up with the Liberal Joneses and think they are "behind" by not having the same "progressive" legislation.

[ib1yysguy]

Yeah, cause every city in America is so popular that they're congested terribly and need to tax people to ease traffic like SF does. The Liberal Joneses are coming!

[DamnYankee]

Sounds like a good way to promote tourism.

[Bonestorm]

"Officials in San Francisco are considering a plan to ease traffic by charging drivers a fee upon entering notoriously clogged sections of the city.

Using $1 million in federal funds, the San Francisco County Transportation Authority is studying various “congestion pricing” options. If approved, such pricing would make San Francisco the first American city to charge cars a fee to enter certain neighborhoods at certain times. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/us/04congestion.html

And we all know how Liberal Democrats work, once one does it, then the rest try and keep up with the Liberal Joneses and think they are "behind" by not having the same "progressive" legislation.

Think of London, a small city

It's dark, dark in the daytime
The people sleep, sleep in the daytime
If they want to, if they want to

[Cancel3]

Cities are faced with some difficult choices these days.

They are required to spend huge amounts of money maintaining roads, traffic controls, emergency reponse units and much more.

This is simply a way to tax those who use the most congested sections.

I am sure there are places you can park and make use of public transportation.



It seems a bit extreme, but not the worst I have heard. It beats the hell out of selling off city and state assets.

[Chapdog]

regressive

[DamnYankee]

Of course they could *gasp* cut expenditures. That's what were doing here in the Great State of North Carolina.

[Bonestorm]

Of course they could *gasp* cut expenditures. That's what were doing here in the Great State of North Carolina.

Well, if the purpose were solely to make the balance sheet look better that would make sense, but the purpose of congestion pricing is to ease congestion not necessarily to raise revenues.

[Damocles]

Well, if the purpose were solely to make the balance sheet look better that would make sense, but the purpose of congestion pricing is to ease congestion not necessarily to raise revenues.

Yeah, the goal is to make it less sexy to be driving your car. Of course all it seems to do is relegate the poor into "loser terrariums"... or "buses" as you might want to call them. Wasting their day standing at the side of the road waiting for a scheduled appearance...

[DamnYankee]

Well, if the purpose were solely to make the balance sheet look better that would make sense, but the purpose of congestion pricing is to ease congestion not necessarily to raise revenues.

I don't suspect that people are using a route through downtown San-Fran during rush hour as a short cut. Obviously the people who are traveling in the congested areas are commuting, delivering goods, or are tourists; all associated with the area and therefore all part of the area commerce. If you punish someone for engaging in commerce then they will do less of it, therefore overall tax revenues will decrease.

[Bonestorm]

Yeah, the goal is to make it less sexy to be driving your car. Of course all it seems to do is relegate the poor into "loser terrariums"... or "buses" as you might want to call them. Wasting their day standing at the side of the road waiting for a scheduled appearance...

Sexiness has nothing to do with it. Congested urban roads are, from a market standpoint, extremely inefficient on myriad levels and environmentally problematic, largely because the rational decision of the individual to drive becomes an irrational, inefficient mess when everyone does it.

Use the revenues from congestion pricing and build a better public transit system (BART is pretty good as it is).

[Bonestorm]

I don't suspect that people are using a route through downtown San-Fran during rush hour as a short cut. Obviously the people who are traveling in the congested areas are commuting, delivering goods, or are tourists; all associated with the area and therefore all part of the area commerce. If you punish someone for engaging in commerce then they will do less of it, therefore overall tax revenues will decrease.

Driving is not engaging in commerce. It is driving. It is a means to get from A to B.

[Damocles]

Sexiness has nothing to do with it. Congested urban roads are, from a market standpoint, extremely inefficient on myriad levels and environmentally problematic, largely because the rational decision of the individual to drive becomes an irrational, inefficient mess when everyone does it.

Use the revenues from congestion pricing and build a better public transit system (BART is pretty good as it is).

You simply described exactly what I just said in different words and added, "Build a better system, it's pretty good anyway" to the end of it.

Idiomatic phrases notwithstanding, the "benefit" again is taking the poor off the streets to make the roads more efficient for the rich who are more capable of paying such punitive taxation. It will also serve to limit tourism...

It's a regressive taxation that serves to benefit the money rich by making them time rich as well.

[DamnYankee]

Driving is not engaging in commerce. It is driving. It is a means to get from A to B.

So, your theory is, that these people are just driving through the area and not stopping to do business in it. Is that your position?

[SmarterthanYou]

spin anything to make a fee or tax look positive. who said that the power to tax was the power to destroy?