Stuck: Most still say Biden ‘cheating’ beat Trump

[Taft2016]

It is not "right wing craziness" to point out that the Constitution limits state election law amendments to the state legislatures.

Changes made by judges, bureaucrats, etc., produce Constitutionally invalid results in those states and no amount of name calling and foot stamping will change that.

[Concart]

When you have near 100 percent of Trumpies believing right-wing craziness, it does not take many in the middle to reach 51 percent. Then Rasmussen leans right, so it is a lock. Trump went to court 65 times and lost every damn one. That was his platform to prove the case and he failed every time. Every recount did the same and he had lots of those too.
So why is this belief important? Trump lost.

Correct. And perception is meaningless. The election result is factual, it is not reliant on an ignorant opinion.

[Concart]

It is not "right wing craziness" to point out that the Constitution limits state election law amendments to the state legislatures.

Changes made by judges, bureaucrats, etc., produce Constitutionally invalid results in those states and no amount of name calling and foot stamping will change that.

State legislatures can assign responsibility to whomever they want, including election boards or the Secretary of State. State courts are allowed to review and interpret legislation. All your name calling and foot stomping won't change THAT. You had your day in court. You lost. Get over it.

[Taft2016]

This is almost like the liberal reaction to the birther argument. They zeroed in on whether Obama was born in the USA, when the actionable argument was whether a natural born citizen could have a parent who was not a US citizen.

The only time the US Supreme Court mentioned it, the court specified "citizen parents" (plural).

So again, they ignore the readily actionable argument and instead focus on the less actionable one.

Liberals... so transparent.

[Taft2016]

State legislatures can assign responsibility to whomever they want, including election boards or the Secretary of State. State courts are allowed to review and interpret legislation. All your name calling and foot stomping won't change THAT. You had your day in court. You lost. Get over it.

You're wrong across the board.

In New York State the legislature appointed a commission to determine if the legislature deserved a raise and would abide by their ruling. The legislature cannot delegate spending and taxing to another entity, especially one not answerable to the voters.

But more specifically, you are wrong in the premise that the legislatures delegated any of these powers and that the courts may usurp them.

You are dismissed now.

[BartenderElite]

This is almost like the liberal reaction to the birther argument. They zeroed in on whether Obama was born in the USA, when the actionable argument was whether a natural born citizen could have a parent who was not a US citizen.

The only time the US Supreme Court mentioned it, the court specified "citizen parents" (plural).

So again, they ignore the readily actionable argument and instead focus on the less actionable one.

Liberals... so transparent.

How did that birther thing turn out, anyway?

[archives]

[I]Washington Examiner

Stuck: Most still say Biden ‘cheating’ beat Trump

Paul Bedard 1 day ago




https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...mp/ar-BB1fBLEV

That is a pretty funny post, even the source he cites has zero to do with what he claims and the Razzy does not say what he implies

These wingers keep talking about Biden being senile, they themselves are the only ones who still believe that Trump won an election five months ago where Trump got seven million less votes than the other guy

[Taft2016]

How did that birther thing turn out, anyway?

The courts determined an American citizen has no standing to question whether or not his President is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office.

Hooray, another step down into tyranny.

[Concart]

You're wrong across the board.

In New York State the legislature appointed a commission to determine if the legislature deserved a raise and would abide by their ruling. The legislature cannot delegate spending and taxing to another entity, especially one not answerable to the voters.

But more specifically, you are wrong in the premise that the legislatures delegated any of these powers and that the courts may usurp them.

You are dismissed now.

LOL, voting is not spending. Is that a difficult concept for you to grasp. I am 100% RIGHT in my assertion. So say the courts. So why would I give a fuck what you say? There's your sign, hillbilly.

[Concart]

The courts determined an American citizen has no standing to question whether or not his President is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office.

Hooray, another step down into tyranny.

The courts ruled that Orly Taitz was full of shit, as were the rest of you birthers. Do you ever get tired of losing? Apparently not.

[BartenderElite]

The courts determined an American citizen has no standing to question whether or not his President is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office.

Hooray, another step down into tyranny.

Nah. Birtherism was actually the start of the descent of the GOP into conspiracy and fallacy.

It's not a real party today. I hope that changes. We need a strong 2-party system.

[Taft2016]

LOL, voting is not spending. Is that a difficult concept for you to grasp. I am 100% RIGHT in my assertion. So say the courts. So why would I give a fuck what you say? There's your sign, hillbilly.

No, you're 100% wrong. The state legislature delegated their pay raise to an outside body, who decided to raise my taxes.

Similarly, in New York we have Industrial Development Agencies who grant property tax breaks to businesses which in turn raises property taxes for single family home owners. Again, unelected bureaucrats raising our taxes, unanswerable to the voters... completely unconstitutional.

[Concart]

"Section 201. Powers and Duties of the Secretary of the Commonwealth.--The Secretary of the Commonwealth shall exercise in the manner provided by this act all powers granted to him by this act, and shall perform all the duties imposed upon him by this act, which shall include the following:
(a) To determine, in accordance with the provisions of this act, the forms of nomination petitions and papers, expense accounts and all other forms and records, the form of which he is required to determine under the provisions of this act.
(b) To examine and reexamine voting machines, and to approve or disapprove them for use in this State, in accordance with the provisions of this act. The secretary shall not approve any voting machine for any election, Federal or State, in this
Commonwealth, that does not comply with the requirements of section 301 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-252, 42 U.S.C. § 15481). ((b) amended July 14, 2009, P.L.86,No.20)
(c) To certify to county boards of elections for primaries and elections the names of the candidates for President and Vice-President of the United States, presidential electors, United States senators, representatives in Congress and all State offices, including senators, representatives, and judges of all courts of record, and delegates and alternate delegates to National Conventions, and members of State committees, and the form and wording of constitutional amendments or other questions to be submitted to the electors of the State at large.
(d) To receive and determine, as hereinafter provided, the sufficiency of nomination petitions, certificates and papers of candidates for President of the United States, presidential electors, United States senators, representatives in Congress
and all State offices, including senators, representatives and judges of all courts of record, and delegates and alternate delegates to National Conventions and members of State committees.
(e) To receive such reports from county boards of elections as are required by this act, and to demand such additional reports on special matters as he may deem necessary. (e.1) To receive from county boards of elections information
on voting system errors or difficulties or other election data pursuant to regulation.
(f) To receive from county boards of elections the returns of primaries and elections, to canvass and compute the votes cast for candidates and upon questions as required by the provisions of this act; to proclaim the results of such
primaries and elections, and to issue certificates of election to the successful candidates at such elections, except in cases where that duty is imposed by law on another officer or board.
(f.1) To develop a voluntary professional certification and poll worker training program for county election officials in consultation with county boards of elections.
(f.2) To order a county board to conduct a recount or recanvass of an election under section 1404 for a public office which appears on the ballot in every election district in this Commonwealth or for a ballot question which appears on the
ballot in every election district in this Commonwealth.
(g) To perform such other duties as may be prescribed by law.
(h) To establish a system for the remedy of complaints regarding the administration of the provisions of Title III of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-252, 4"

Oops.

[Concart]

No, you're 100% wrong. The state legislature delegated their pay raise to an outside body, who decided to raise my taxes.

Similarly, in New York we have Industrial Development Agencies who grant property tax breaks to businesses which in turn raises property taxes for single family home owners. Again, unelected bureaucrats raising our taxes, unanswerable to the voters... completely unconstitutional.

Who cares? Pay raises have nothing to do with voting. Property taxes have nothing to do with voting. Good luck in court. Oh wait. You already lost. 65 times.

ROTLFMFAO!!!

[ThatOwlWoman]

When you have near 100 percent of Trumpies believing right-wing craziness, it does not take many in the middle to reach 51 percent. Then Rasmussen leans right, so it is a lock. Trump went to court 65 times and lost every damn one. That was his platform to prove the case and he failed every time. Every recount did the same and he had lots of those too.
So why is this belief important? Trump lost.

Because in his heart the OP and the rest of the Cult KNOW that #TRE45ON lost -- and lost soundly to an "old man with dementia." But by pretending that they don't believe it was a righteous election, they think that they can save face. Even if it's got egg dripping down, it's face. lol