You are now the THIRD libtard to both see and respond to my post, offering up no more than a single short sentence in response that does not include any rebuttal to anything that I said about the history of the two parties. At least ask yourself why the Demonkkkrat Party, on their own website, actively chooses to completely ignore the first 100 years of their own existence......
You don't speak for Legion. Legion can speak for himself.
Global warming
Transsexual medical issues
Denial of many documented history events like Greenwood Ok
The southern strategy it’s self
The blatant racism of cheating voters of color which is extensively Us court documented
The rights embrace of the Austrian school of economics which provides nothing but complete failure in practice
The Austrian school does economics without math
Yes you read that correctly
They think economics has nothing to do with math
Is it any wonder why their economic ideas always fail in practice
And I created a post (Post #3 within your thread) explaining why the "party platform switch" theory is complete and utter bullshit.
Yes you were, dumbass.
Why did the Demonkkkrat Party's own official website actively choose to ignore the first ONE HUNDRED YEARS of their own Party's history?
All you did was copying and pasting someone's else words. You have not pointed out what was in error in OP.
No I wasn't. Clearly you have not caught up with the fact that I have a sense of humor. Legion loves to post the "genetic fallacy" image. You committed a genetic fallacy by dismissing the sites.Yes you were, dumbass.
Explain why it is necessary for them to do so.Why did the Demonkkkrat Party's own official website actively choose to ignore a whole ONE HUNDRED YEARS of their own Party's history?
Oh really?? Then you should be able to easily reproduce the website and text that I supposedly "cut and pasted"... We are all awaiting your bountiful display of wisdom!
No, dude... I type up my own responses... each and every one of them... I have no need to cut/paste from other sources because I am a free thinker. I have no need to allow livescience and Wikipedia to do my thinking for me.
Yes, I have. The OP's (your) position that the two parties switched platforms is in error, and I described precisely why that is. See my post #3 in this thread.
No genetic fallacy was committed... I dismissed livescience and Wikipedia links with prejudice as I have seen enough evidence of their continued incompleteness, misleadingness, and just plain incorrectness to no longer waste my time with them anymore.
I did not dismiss the argument itself (as made by those two sources, claiming that "the two major parties switched platforms"). I directly addressed (and demolished) that argument throughout the rest of my post #3.
I didn't say that it was necessary to do. They can choose to present their history however they see fit.
However, I have every right to question their presentation of their history, including questioning why they would wish to completely skip over the first one hundred years of their history. I would think that one wanting to learn about a political party would wish to know when they were formed, how they were formed, why they were formed, etc... I would think that one would wish to also hear about early accomplishments of the Party...??
You have yet to rebut a single sentence in my OP. And yes you did commit genetic fallacy. Dismissing sources is genetic fallacy.
And who is skipping over the first one hundred years? We have history classes for that.
I'm hopeful but I don't think you'll be able to rebut a single point.
Bookmarks