domer76 (04-09-2021)
Members banned from this thread: cancel2 2022 and anatta |
domer76 (04-09-2021)
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
the 2d Amendment states citizens have the right to join a well-regulated militia and therefore bear arms, doesn't say anything about random militias regulating themselves. In other words the amendment doesn't say that ordinary citizens, who are not part of the state's well-regulated militia, have a right to bear arms.
that phrase "well-regulation militia" always trips the gun freaks up, can't get by that one
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
the framers had just won a war against a government that tried to 'regulate' their arms.....
the framers used several definitions for 'well regulated', as evidence by numerous dictionaries
at the time that the 2nd Amendment was written and ratified, 'well regulated' meant something OTHER than government regulated.
The framers were concerned about a central government and their standing army denying each state their autonomy.....thus they were adamant about states keeping the people armed to prevent that
statists, such as yourself, like to lie about the 2nd Amendment saying it was about a states right to have a government regulated national guard, but fail to take in to account Art. 1, Sec 10, paragraph 3........to whit
"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."
so, in light of the NUMEROUS historical pieces of evidence that have been presented to this forum that the 2nd Amendment does NOT refer to government regulated forces, it's OBVIOUS that the 2nd Amendment was written to prohibit the new federal government from infringing on the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms......
deny it,
go
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
no need to go further than your first few ridiculous comments
l
the government that had just tried to regulate their arms was a FOREIGN government, a fact you brush aside like there was no Revolutionary War. That's the context no matter how much you twist and turn
and where in the hell does the amendment even infer these militias are intended to address the United States' government, and not foreign governments? That make zero sense.......was that a civil war or a revolutionary war against a foreign power?.........you're not making any sense
this is why you are considered a moron. That government was NOT a foreign government. The 'colonies' were at that time still BRITISH, you ignorant moron............
you've obviously never done anything but listen to your anti gun democrat handlers, because had you read any of the historical documents from the framers, you'd know
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Bookmarks