Reply With Quotewrong. you have no clue what the constitution means or why it was written. sit down and shut the fuck up, simpletonOriginally Posted by LV426
Members banned from this thread: cancel2 2022 and anatta |
rebel
show your proof
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
wrong. you have no clue what the constitution means or why it was written. sit down and shut the fuck up, simpleton
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Truthmatters
No it isn’t
And YOU are not who the founders picked to interpret the constitutions for America
Verified User
LMAO!
You can't pick and chose at your discretion which parts of the Constitution are originalist and which aren't.
I mean you CAN, you'll just look like an idiot if you do.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Truthmatters
The SCOTUS is tasked with making those determinations
Verified User
What? You say crazy things that are so wrong. Who was killed by the American government? Police thinned out the forest, are you counting them.?
Truthmatters
The republicans think They own this nation
They don’t
They share it
But they don’t like sharing
rebel
the problem lies with what YOU think the constitution does. It doesn't provide the people with their rights, it provides restrictions upon the government.
thinking any different makes you the idiot
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
first off, I said governments, meaning global.
secondly, how many native americans did the US government murder?
how many japanese americans died at the hands of the us government?
go learn some history instead of being brainwashed by your handlers, moron
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Senior Member
.
.
Let me see ... Swords were abundant ... tomahawks were abundant ... large knives were abundant ... blunderbuss' were abundant ... dueling pistols were abundant ... oh yeah ... muskets were abundant (rifles came along later).
evince (04-09-2021)
Truthmatters
The founders also built into the system a way for future Americans to amend the constitution
So even they were not originalists
rebel
the constitution was written to restrict government, not restrict the people.
that's where you fucking statist republicans and democrats are flat wrong
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Banned
That is absolutely right.
Verified User
That belief is wrong. It defines the separation of powers that Trump ignored. The founders suggested rewriting the constitution periodically because they knew they could not predict the future. It was in the end rejected, but the assumption that the fathers wanted it enshrined for posterity is incorrect. They agreed to an amendment process because they knew better.
Jefferson suggested every generation should have the solemn opportunity to update it and pass it on til the end of time.
I am sure the second would not have survived that process.
evince (04-09-2021)
Banned
You are a completely uneducated idiot. And you prove it every single time you post.
Posting Rules
Bookmarks