So, avoid the medical examiner report proving you wrong and spew hysterical smears about racism and toughness.
Devastating counterpoint there, Socrates.
talking tough for dummies.jpg
And?
I've seen it take eight cops to bring down and keep down a huge guy on drugs. You arrogantly deciding that you know better than all the trained experts who were actually there based on literally nothing but the fact that it seems mean on a superficial level to the layperson in no way changes the fact that Floyd already tried to escape once. THAT'S why the extreme measures were taken, and they were entirely justified, even if it offends your "play nice with others" feelings.
Do you stand over surgeons and lecture them about how you would have stitched a person up better too? Or do you only spew such presumptuous peanut gallery sniveling and sniping at police officers?
content bs.jpg
Another blatantly baseless assumption that reveals ignorance of basic facts about what cops go through on a daily basis with large druggies.
blatant lie.jpeg
You don't get to try to escape a second time. Try to get away once and you forfeit the right to cry like a bitch when extreme measures have to be taken.
Being "intoxicated" is the entire reason he died...it's kind of relevant, especially since pinning him down provably had nothing to do with his death. It just looks mean on camera, so emotional simpletons cry about it like it's relevant to anything.
We finally are back to agreeing on something.
So, avoid the medical examiner report proving you wrong and spew hysterical smears about racism and toughness.
Devastating counterpoint there, Socrates.
talking tough for dummies.jpg
The prosecutor is leading Lt. Richard Zimmerman to discuss use-of-force policies. He says all officers are required to take a training course once a year on what is proper and legal. This is likely leading to a direct question of Zimmerman about Derek Chauvin’s restraint of George Floyd.
This testimony is devastating for Derek Chauvin: One of the Minneapolis Police Department’s most respected and longest-serving officers says what Chauvin did to George Floyd was a violation of policy.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/04...-chauvin-trial
1) You are way more generous than I am spelling it all out for him like that. There is no validity to his arbitrary assumptions worth responding to. Facts don't just stop mattering because your feelings got offended about the junky thief getting himself pinned down.
2) The fact that there are even charges means the injustice already exists, regardless of the outcome. Chauvin did literally nothing wrong. He is guilty of looking mean in a nation of simple-minded emotional morons, nothing more.
For overdosing on drugs? No, dumb-ass. Obviously, the junkie dying of his own drug habit isn't anyone inflicting any kind of punishment on him at all, but the terrible crime against humanity of pinning down the junkie thief who already tried to get away once...THAT ABSOLUTELY is a legitimate punishment for his multiple crimes.
I mean, the capitol protest wouldn't have happened in the first place if the HUNDREDS of Democrat terrorist attacks leading up to it had been handled that way, so sure, as long as we're enforcing the law the same across the board on that, since Democrat terrorist attacks utterly dominate America's political violence landscape, I would be all for it. That policy would quickly cleanse this country of its infection of communism nearly overnight.
Seems unnecessary. Just shoot them.
Bookmarks