Excellent points....If posters were really on ignore, there would be no mention of them at all... (I thought that Lame "Fake Ignore" thing had faded into oblivion.....is someone else still posting that? )
Many times, they do it in threads started by the people they claim to be ignoring.
In quite a few instances, these folks are responding to a post by someone they'd previously announced they were ignoring.
Often, some of these individuals announce that they are putting someone "on ignore" even though they've already claimed to have done so, as if it's "news".
In a lot of cases, someone has proclaimed that they have taken someone "off ignore" and are now putting them back "on ignore"
Discuss.
Excellent points....If posters were really on ignore, there would be no mention of them at all... (I thought that Lame "Fake Ignore" thing had faded into oblivion.....is someone else still posting that? )
cancel2 2022 (03-29-2021)
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Guno צְבִי (03-28-2021)
cancel2 2022 (03-29-2021)
Today, 07:51 AM
TQP
Retired Teacher
This message is hidden because TQP is on your ignore list.
Screen Shot 2021-03-28 at 11.01.31 AM.jpg
Well, now as you can easily see from my image above, you DO exist on somebody's IGNORE list. And you can also see you were wrong about who I'm ignoring. You're pretty good at being wrong. You're wrong so much, you'd think you'd get tired of being wrong.
Congratulations, mutherfukker.
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
ThatOwlWoman (03-28-2021)
Bookmarks