Reply With Quotethey needed the excuse for more money and power and knew that the democrats would burn the constitution on television to give it to them
Members banned from this thread: ThatOwlWoman and Doc Dutch |
Verified User
FBI caught lying about jan 6 th
The web site Parler sent 50 warnings to the fbi letting them know about peoples plans for jan 6th.
The FBI didn't do anything and lied about it .
Wonder why they did this.
rebel
they needed the excuse for more money and power and knew that the democrats would burn the constitution on television to give it to them
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Verified User
deep state orchestrated media event with real casualties, to buttress a narrative.Originally Posted by Bulletbob
morality is a set of beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that facilitate voluntary, cooperative and mutually beneficial relationships.
Trump Wins,
by definition https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/trump
Verified User
Where's your credible reference.
Lock Him Up
rebel
list every single source around the world that YOU consider 'credible', so we know when we should threadban your stupid ass
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Verified User
This sounds like a whining loser's reply.
Lock Him Up
martin (03-28-2021)
Verified User
A "credible reference" would anyone who swore for four years that Trump would never complete his term because of Russian collusion, right?
Bulletbob (03-28-2021)
Verified User
Don't you have anything better than off the wall rebuttal to offer???????????????????
Lock Him Up
rebel
so you can't do that, just attack sources who's info you don't like.......................that sounds like a whining loser
This sounds like a whining loser's reply.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Oderint dum metuant
No, you don't wonder why they did this, and neither do I.
Oderint dum metuant
Right here, cum gargler, in the same thread that Y O U replied to:
In the days after the Capitol protest on January 6, 2021, Big Tech moved against the conservative alternative social media platform, Parler, on the premise that the protesters used Parler to plan the "attack on the Capitol" and that Parler had failed in its responsibility to prevent such coordination.
Based on this narrative, Apple and Google removed Parler from their app stores and Amazon removed Parler’s internet hosting.
Yet on Thursday, Parler flipped the narrative on its head.
Parler sent a response to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform’s request for documents regarding the riot.
In that response, Parler revealed that it had “proactively developed an open line of communication with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the fall of 2020 and referred violent content and incitement from Parler’s platform over 50 times before January 6th. Parler also warned the FBI about specific threats of violence being planned for the events at the Capitol on January 6th.”
The letter details Parler’s efforts “to flag and remove unlawful speech from its platform that was not protected by the First Amendment.” It also notes that of the 270 charging documents filed by the Department of Justice, 80 percent of social media references involved Big Tech platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. “Only 5% referred to Parler.”
The letter goes on to explain that Parler accumulated over 15 million users by January 2021 and its app was the most downloaded app at the Apple App Store and the Google U.S. Play Store on January 8, 2021.
The company’s press release connected the dots.
“Big Tech rivals Facebook and Twitter saw Parler as a viable threat and ganged up with Amazon and others to de-platform and destroy the Company. Big Tech has been effectively scapegoating Parler for the riots at the Capitol, but Parler’s revelations today show that the Company acted responsibly to try and stop the violence at the Capitol on January 6th,” the press release concluded.
Along with the letter and the press release, Parler provided the emails alerting the FBI to incitements to violence on Parler’s social media platform. The company repeatedly warned its FBI contact about the potential for violence on January 6.
In one email, Parler forwarded a message from a user who called for “an armed force of American Patriots 150,000… prepared to react to the congressional events of January 6th … And follow what the Declaration of Independence has dictated to do in situations of absolute despotism.”
“One more from same account. More where this came from. Concerned about Wednesday,” a Parler employee wrote to the FBI contact on January 2, the Saturday before the events of Wednesday, January 6.
Contrary to the Big Tech narrative, Parler did its due diligence and reported threats of violence to the FBI in advance of the Capitol protest. These actions, coupled with the fact that Parler only appeared in 5 percent of the DOJ’s charging documents, completely flips the Big Tech narrative on its head. The Capitol protesters did coordinate on Parler, in part, but they also did so on other social media platforms.
Parler was not negligent in its duty to remove incitements to violence, as Amazon, Apple, and Google claimed.
In fact, it removed those incitements and altered the FBI about them.
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:18b6cc84-03e0-4d84-9536-917fd7acfa12#pageNum=1
Verified User
The source's reputation for being factual is very important, if you use a dubious source of info for your reference, then expect to be questioned and expect to be doubted.
Lock Him Up
Oderint dum metuant
Verified User
well legion , I can only guess why but there are only 2 reasons, one is they are completely inept , the other is they wanted it to happen
Senior Member
In a real debate forum they would be kicked off the stage if the laughter failed to move them.
This sounds like a whining loser's reply.
Trumpet (03-28-2021)
Posting Rules
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-dmn.s3.amazonaws.com/public/3ITGUQVZUKNNEGJULJGL6M537M.png)
Bookmarks