Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: More lies and misinformation from the radical right-wing media.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,110
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,362 Times in 6,034 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default More lies and misinformation from the radical right-wing media.

    The Washington Times appeared to retract an article claiming that a facial recognition company identified members of the left-wing antifa movement that the paper said infiltrated a group of President Trump's supporters that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

    The company, XRVision, demanded the article be taken down and alleged that it was completely false, according to an email statement sent to The Hill. The article appeared to be taken down Thursday afternoon.

    "XRVision takes pride in its technology's precision and deems the Washington Times publication as outright false, misleading, and defamatory," the statement read.

    "Our attorney is in contact with the Washington Times and has instructed them to ‘Cease and Desist’ from any claims regarding sourcing of XRVision analytics, to retract the current claims, and publish and apology."

    The retraction comes as several conservative lawmakers and media figures blamed antifa, an umbrella term for loosely organized anti-fascist groups, for the riot that breached both the House and Senate chambers.

    Footage and photos captured around the Capitol building on Wednesday showed a pro-Trump crowd breaking past Capitol Police and smashing windows to enter the premises.

    The Washington Times didn’t immediately respond to comment from The Hill.

    The article, which was published Wednesday, alleged that XRVision performed a facial recognition of protesters and matched “two Philadelphia Antifa members to two men inside the Senate.”

    One man allegedly had a tattoo indicating he is a “Stalinist sympathizer,” the article claimed. The article also said another man identified “shows up at climate and Black Lives Matter protests in the West” but said that he had no known links to antifa.

    The article went viral as the riot progressed. When the House reconvened after the siege, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), a staunch supporter of Trump, gave a fiery floor speech in which specifically cited the Times's article.

    Prior to the article being taken down, XRVision told The Hill in a statement that the analysis actually identified two members of neo-Nazi organizations and an actor with “QAnon promotion history.” No identification associated with antifa was made with any of them.

    When asked if the company was aware that the article was taken down, the attorney said it was unaware, but “unfortunately, the damage has already been done.”

    The Washington Times told The Hill on Thursday evening that the story was re-uploaded with the following correction: "An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that XRVision facial recognition software identified Antifa members among rioters who stormed the Capitol Wednesday. XRVision did not identify any Antifa members. The Washington Times apologizes to XRVision for the error."

    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,110
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,362 Times in 6,034 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default

    Republicans Are Gaslighting The Country About The Capitol Riot
    GOP lawmakers are desperately trying to deflect blame away from Donald Trump and themselves.

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/repub...b613cec15d8b73

    Sure, the attack on the Capitol was bad, but did you hear about the attack on the White House last year?

    The supposed siege of the president’s residence is the latest Republican deflection from the events of Jan. 6, when a pro-Donald Trump mob stirred up by Republican lies about voter fraud ransacked the U.S. Capitol.

    Some Republicans, such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.), have admitted what actually happened.

    “They stormed the Senate floor. They tried to hunt down the speaker of the House. They built a gallows and chanted about murdering the vice president,” McConnell said in February. “They did this because they had been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth ― because he was angry he’d lost an election.”

    But others are compiling a growing list of distractions, excuses and alternate theories of the day’s events, hoping that as time passes, the public forgets what actually went on. Here are some of the ways Republicans are trying to deflect blame:

    The Rioters Were Just A Group Of Random People, Not United By Anything
    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    89,055
    Thanks
    146,954
    Thanked 83,397 Times in 53,276 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    *Washington Times" -- hahaha. Hopefully the company sues their pants off.

    So just how would a facial recognition program know who the two ppl in question were? If you or I were there, how would it know who WE are?
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flaming Capitalist View Post
    The Washington Times appeared to retract an article claiming that a facial recognition company identified members of the left-wing antifa movement that the paper said infiltrated a group of President Trump's supporters that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

    The company, XRVision, demanded the article be taken down and alleged that it was completely false, according to an email statement sent to The Hill. The article appeared to be taken down Thursday afternoon.

    "XRVision takes pride in its technology's precision and deems the Washington Times publication as outright false, misleading, and defamatory," the statement read.

    "Our attorney is in contact with the Washington Times and has instructed them to ‘Cease and Desist’ from any claims regarding sourcing of XRVision analytics, to retract the current claims, and publish and apology."

    The retraction comes as several conservative lawmakers and media figures blamed antifa, an umbrella term for loosely organized anti-fascist groups, for the riot that breached both the House and Senate chambers.

    Footage and photos captured around the Capitol building on Wednesday showed a pro-Trump crowd breaking past Capitol Police and smashing windows to enter the premises.

    The Washington Times didn’t immediately respond to comment from The Hill.

    The article, which was published Wednesday, alleged that XRVision performed a facial recognition of protesters and matched “two Philadelphia Antifa members to two men inside the Senate.”

    One man allegedly had a tattoo indicating he is a “Stalinist sympathizer,” the article claimed. The article also said another man identified “shows up at climate and Black Lives Matter protests in the West” but said that he had no known links to antifa.

    The article went viral as the riot progressed. When the House reconvened after the siege, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), a staunch supporter of Trump, gave a fiery floor speech in which specifically cited the Times's article.

    Prior to the article being taken down, XRVision told The Hill in a statement that the analysis actually identified two members of neo-Nazi organizations and an actor with “QAnon promotion history.” No identification associated with antifa was made with any of them.

    When asked if the company was aware that the article was taken down, the attorney said it was unaware, but “unfortunately, the damage has already been done.”

    [COLOR="#FF0000"]The Washington Times told The Hill on Thursday evening that the story was re-uploaded with the following correction: "An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that XRVision facial recognition software identified Antifa members among rioters who stormed the Capitol Wednesday. XRVision did not identify any Antifa members. The Washington Times apologizes to XRVision for the error."
    the Examiner is a Rev Sun Myung Moon rag, never to be trusted for shit

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,857
    Thanks
    19,749
    Thanked 9,460 Times in 7,746 Posts
    Groans
    836
    Groaned 510 Times in 503 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    the Examiner is a Rev Sun Myung Moon rag, never to be trusted for shit
    But I bet "The Guardian" is in your myopic world, huh?

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,288
    Thanks
    3,870
    Thanked 5,011 Times in 3,467 Posts
    Groans
    1,286
    Groaned 494 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    *Washington Times" -- hahaha. Hopefully the company sues their pants off.

    So just how would a facial recognition program know who the two ppl in question were? If you or I were there, how would it know who WE are?
    >So just how would a facial recognition program know who the two ppl in question were?

    LOL google facial recognition. It's not even that complicated, it just takes a huge database to store the data. You people are so ignorant. WTF a floor guy knows more about it than you. They even have AI that can recognize a person's gait

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    State of Bliss
    Posts
    31,007
    Thanks
    7,095
    Thanked 5,196 Times in 3,829 Posts
    Groans
    433
    Groaned 261 Times in 257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    They need to stick to blaming the deep state, soros & hillar's pizza parlor guy since they won't sue them or call them out for the lies..

    Imaginary lovers & strawmen never let you down..........
    "There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone," McConnell wrote. "His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended."



  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,041
    Thanks
    35,071
    Thanked 21,784 Times in 17,103 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,343 Times in 2,262 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tinfoil View Post
    >So just how would a facial recognition program know who the two ppl in question were?

    LOL google facial recognition. It's not even that complicated, it just takes a huge database to store the data. You people are so ignorant. WTF a floor guy knows more about it than you. They even have AI that can recognize a person's gait
    It depends on how much information about you is on the database.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,110
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,362 Times in 6,034 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tinfoil View Post
    >So just how would a facial recognition program know who the two ppl in question were?

    LOL google facial recognition. It's not even that complicated, it just takes a huge database to store the data. You people are so ignorant. WTF a floor guy knows more about it than you. They even have AI that can recognize a person's gait
    Don't wear a mask, tinfool. And please don't get vaccinated. I hope you haven't already. You still sound like a RADICALIZED right-wing extremist so I'm assuming you haven't. Please tell me you haven't been vaccinated, tinfool.
    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-27-2021, 02:51 PM
  2. Right Wing Media Lies about Antifa in Seattle
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-13-2020, 02:00 AM
  3. What Is The Difference Between Bad Media Lies And Good Media Lies?
    By Flanders in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 10-07-2019, 05:40 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-23-2019, 03:20 PM
  5. APP - More left wing media lies
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-23-2018, 08:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •