Texas Removes Mask Mandate To Scare All The Californians Away

[moon]

' Wealth over Healthers ' all seem to be El Trumpo spear-carriers.

[CASPER]

What means squat to them is the collateral damage caused by some of these policies. Finally, some of our leaders are recognizing it and have the courage to act on it.

He is just trying to divert attention away from his own culpability in the disaster of how they have run the State Power Grid. His politics will cost Texans in suffering and death, but then the right does not give a shit about people lives, and never have, it is all about $$$$.

[cancel2 2022]

' Wealth over Healthers ' all seem to be El Trumpo spear-carriers.

Why can't you be fucking honest for once in your life and admit you see it as an opportunity to destroy capitalism?

[cancel2 2022]

He is just trying to divert attention away from his own culpability in the disaster of how they have run the State Power Grid. His politics will cost Texans in suffering and death, but then the right does not give a shit about people lives, and never have, it is all about $$$$.

I bet you were defending the eco-twats in California that refused to allow undergrowth to be removed and resulted in huge wildfires. What about those people lives, Gasper?

[CASPER]

I bet you were defending the eco-twats in California that refused to allow undergrowth to be removed and resulted in huge wildfires. What about those people lives, Gasper?

Seems you forget much of the land that burned was Federal Land, remind me again, Skippy, who it is that is in charge of Federal Land?

Besides what can you do when the crazy Israelis are using their satellites to shoot laser beams into our forests to start fires, right?

[cancel2 2022]

Seems you forget much of the land that burned was Federal Land, remind me again, Skippy, who it is that is in charge of Federal Land?

Besides what can you do when the crazy Israelis are using their satellites to shoot laser beams into our forests to start fires, right?

Holy fuck, not that old chestnut again!!

California Forest Statistics
There are 33 million acres of forest(ed) lands in California.

Federal ownership is 19 million acres = 57%

State and local agencies (including land trusts) own 3%

Privately owned forest lands are 13.3 million acres = 40%

Industrial private owners are 4.7 million acres = 14%

Non-industrial privately owned forest lands are 9 million acres = 26%

Non-corporate private forest lands are 7.9 million acres

REITs and other investment devices are 344,000 acres

90+% of the non-corporate private ownerships are 500 acres or less

Four million acres are classified as very highly productive lands capable of producing 165 cu ft of wood product growth per year.

Redwood forests are the highest producing forests (and are a large part of the Four million acres of highly productive forest lands in the State.

Approx. 80% of wood product produced in California comes from private lands

Given the above and that the BoF analysis claimed 1.2 million acres as the max – and – now unlimited ownerships(including those now in NTMPs which is encouraged). With no limitation on the number of ownerships that can be included in a Working Forest Management Plan (WFMP = Timber Harvest up to 15,000 approved in perpetuity with limited future agency review and no future access to the public for review – and – not subject to future rules changes) and no clear estimate on the potential number of such plans the estimate of total forested acres that can potentially be included under the WFMP could range from 2.4 million acres to 4.8 million acres (over time).

Note: It is difficult to arrive at an accurate estimate as the whole process (acreage available and acreage likely to participate) is not addressed in environmental and project review by the Board of Forestry.

https://www.forestunlimited.org/reso...st-statistics/

[CASPER]

Holy fuck, not that old chestnut again!!

California Forest Statistics
There are 33 million acres of forest(ed) lands in California.

Federal ownership is 19 million acres = 57%

State and local agencies (including land trusts) own 3%

Privately owned forest lands are 13.3 million acres = 40%

Industrial private owners are 4.7 million acres = 14%

Non-industrial privately owned forest lands are 9 million acres = 26%

Non-corporate private forest lands are 7.9 million acres

REITs and other investment devices are 344,000 acres

90+% of the non-corporate private ownerships are 500 acres or less

Four million acres are classified as very highly productive lands capable of producing 165 cu ft of wood product growth per year.

Redwood forests are the highest producing forests (and are a large part of the Four million acres of highly productive forest lands in the State.

Approx. 80% of wood product produced in California comes from private lands

Given the above and that the BoF analysis claimed 1.2 million acres as the max – and – now unlimited ownerships(including those now in NTMPs which is encouraged). With no limitation on the number of ownerships that can be included in a Working Forest Management Plan (WFMP = Timber Harvest up to 15,000 approved in perpetuity with limited future agency review and no future access to the public for review – and – not subject to future rules changes) and no clear estimate on the potential number of such plans the estimate of total forested acres that can potentially be included under the WFMP could range from 2.4 million acres to 4.8 million acres (over time).

Note: It is difficult to arrive at an accurate estimate as the whole process (acreage available and acreage likely to participate) is not addressed in environmental and project review by the Board of Forestry.

https://www.forestunlimited.org/reso...st-statistics/

So the majority of the land is Federal land, it is run by the Feds. Glad you finally figured that one out.

The vast majority of the rest is Private land, with only 3% being State land, so the Private owners need to get their house in order also, good to know.

Your point was What?

[cancel2 2022]

Holy fuck, not that old chestnut again!! Plenty of blame to go round however many eco-loonys were more concerned about the Lesser Spotted Owl than human beings!


California Forest Statistics
There are 33 million acres of forest(ed) lands in California.

Federal ownership is 19 million acres = 57%

State and local agencies (including land trusts) own 3%

Privately owned forest lands are 13.3 million acres = 40%

Industrial private owners are 4.7 million acres = 14%

Non-industrial privately owned forest lands are 9 million acres = 26%

Non-corporate private forest lands are 7.9 million acres

REITs and other investment devices are 344,000 acres

90+% of the non-corporate private ownerships are 500 acres or less

Four million acres are classified as very highly productive lands capable of producing 165 cu ft of wood product growth per year.

Redwood forests are the highest producing forests (and are a large part of the Four million acres of highly productive forest lands in the State.

Approx. 80% of wood product produced in California comes from private lands

Given the above and that the BoF analysis claimed 1.2 million acres as the max – and – now unlimited ownerships(including those now in NTMPs which is encouraged). With no limitation on the number of ownerships that can be included in a Working Forest Management Plan (WFMP = Timber Harvest up to 15,000 approved in perpetuity with limited future agency review and no future access to the public for review – and – not subject to future rules changes) and no clear estimate on the potential number of such plans the estimate of total forested acres that can potentially be included under the WFMP could range from 2.4 million acres to 4.8 million acres (over time).

Note: It is difficult to arrive at an accurate estimate as the whole process (acreage available and acreage likely to participate) is not addressed in environmental and project review by the Board of Forestry.

https://www.forestunlimited.org/reso...st-statistics/

.

[cancel2 2022]

So the majority of the land is Federal land, it is run by the Feds. Glad you finally figured that one out.

The vast majority of the rest is Private land, with only 3% being State land, so the Private owners need to get their house in order also, good to know.

Your point was What?

Doesn't matter whose land it is, they all have a duty of care to prevent wildfires, stop with your pathetic red herrings. If private land is overgrown and a fire hazard then the state should tell them to clear the brush and undergrowth, if they don't then the state will do it and send them the bill. Tell me about Paradise in Butte County in 2018, what excuse do you have for that? 87 died from wildfires that year by the way!

https://abcnews.go.com/us/relentless...ry?id=59262994

[moon]

Why can't you be fucking honest for once in your life and admit you see it as an opportunity to destroy capitalism?

What you are propounding, you poor old maggot, is that Covid 19 is an anti-capitalist virus. You are clearly round the twist.
Go take it out on a climate refugee.

[cancel2 2022]

What you are propounding, you poor old maggot, is that Covid 19 is an anti-capitalist virus. You are clearly round the twist.
Go take it out on a climate refugee.

Bullshitter to the last, why am I not surprised?

[moon]

Bullshitter to the last, why am I not surprised?

Maggot-- go home and help out on a farm bereft of workers due to Brexit. Show some bulldog spirit.





Haw, haw...................................haw.

[no worries]

What means squat to them is the collateral damage caused by some of these policies. Finally, some of our leaders are recognizing it and have the courage to act on it.

Dead and hospitalized people?

Good, hope Texas don't need any extra help with "collateral damage', like they did with the winter storm, a crisis of their own making, then, begging for a "socialist" handout.

[Lightbringer]

Dead and hospitalized people?

Good, hope Texas don't need any extra help with "collateral damage', like they did with the winter storm, a crisis of their own making, then, begging for a "socialist" handout.

You have no idea what "socialist" means do you fuckwit?

[AProudLefty]

I am happy that Mexicans will be able to get the Alamo back.