The military occupation of DC has nothing to do with any credible threats

[Underdog]

That's your problem.

no, that's my experience, liars never say they were infantry then support. thats always a clue. I may have some real strong disagreements with him and see him teetering on tribalism at times, but I am confident his base is solid.

[Legion]

no, that's my experience, liars never say they were infantry then support.

In your opinion.

[Underdog]

In your opinion.

and experience.

[Nordberg]

The theme of the thread is a lie from the start. We had a terrible attack on the nation's capital and over 140 cops were injured, 5 people died. The "worst ' of them said they were coming back on 3-4
for Trump's "rightful" inauguration. Congress decided not to sit on the 4th because of the threat. Yet Legion writes that there was no credible threat. The military, the capital police, and congress took it seriously. They would have been creamed if they left and another insurrection happened. Maybe the proud boys, White supremacists and other America-hating groups after waiting for the withdrawal.

[Legion]

and experience.

You're entitled to your opinion.

The fact is that GASPER possesses no authoritative knowledge of the situation being discussed, and I see no reason to allow him to imbue himself with credibility that he does not possess.

[CASPER]

The fact that a democrat house member convinced them to move them to a garage cause of "covid" (media scrubbed that) shows a lack of respect and the lack of live ammo in the loadout indicates the threat was not nearly what it was portrayed as.

I did forget that. being an 11b I would think you would be more sensitive to politicians abusing the guard and other military types for optics. I had to look the other two mos's up, lithographer? Supply guy? maybe you lost touch on this? no offense intended, but as you see there was no reason and remains no reason to keep them there, for how much longer now? it's abusive for optics.

a shitty thing to do.

Ammo is available, count on it.

You know what 11B is, 76Y is Supply, of which Unit Armorer is part of, and is what I was in several Mech Inf. Units, 21L is a Pershing Missile Electronics Repairman.

[Legion]

The theme of the thread is a lie from the start.

Who told you that?

[Underdog]

You're entitled to your opinion.

The fact is that GASPER possesses no authoritative knowledge of the situation being discussed, and I see no reason to allow him to imbue himself with credibility that he does not possess.

You can hate him all you want, he's thanked douchebags attacking me, has gotten snarky with me at times, but at the end of the day, from a guy who spent 8 years active, a couple as a contractor, I can tell you, his claims of service ring absolutely true with me.

[Legion]

You can hate him all you want, he's thanked douchebags attacking me, has gotten snarky with me at times, but at the end of the day, from a guy who spent 8 years active, a couple as a contractor, I can tell you, his claims of service ring absolutely true with me.

You're missing the point. His claims are irrelevant to any factual discussion of the thread topic. I don't care about your credulity.

[Legion]

Ammo is available, count on it.

Who told you that, and why is is relevant?

I'll understand if refuse to answer, of course.

[Underdog]

Ammo is available, count on it.

You know what 11B is, 76Y is Supply, of which Unit Armorer is part of, and is what I was in several Mech Inf. Units, 21L is a Pershing Missile Electronics Repairman.

So you know what I did. my last duty station was a DRU called AFOTEC, I literally was a jtac for a space based system (in a test obviously) was pretty fucking cool. I'm pretty sure the system is unclassified. lol I hope. it was a 6 month stint with my pending 180 day terminal leave (they changed the availability to take a 180 day leave without selling it back right after me) over in albuquerque.


I looked up 21L, I got a camera guy
https://www.part-time-commander.com/...-lithographer/

I wasnt army so Im sure Im looking some shit up wrong.

[Underdog]

You're missing the point. His claims are irrelevant to any factual discussion of the thread topic. I don't care about your credulity.

so we have a disagreement, he's saying ammo is avail in supply chains, my contention is that if it's not on thier battle rattle then it's not a serious threat.

[Legion]

so we have a disagreement, he's saying ammo is avail in supply chains, my contention is that if it's not on thier battle rattle then it's not a serious threat.

His claims are unsubstantiated, and are thus irrelevant. Savvy?

[archives]

TRUE

Fortunately Homeland Security, the FBI, and the Capitol police disagree with you and "copy," now who do you think is more of an authority on the matter, those entities, or the Tucker stooge that "copy" posted as an informed source?

[Underdog]

His claims are unsubstantiated, and are thus irrelevant. Savvy?

I always spell their wrong. thats how you can tell these other dweebs aren't my sock. lol

You autistic? serious question no offense intended.