LIFE IS SHORT - SMILE WHILE YOU STILL HAVE TEETH.
we must all learn to hear what we do not like - the questions is not, "is it pleasant?" but, "is it true?"
Conflating facts is a tool in the Republican playbook and has been for decades
The Republican voter is just duped ....waiting for lies to protect their feelings so they dont have to admit they have been wrong all their lives
It’s why the “own the libs” resonates with them
All their lives people on the left that they know in real life have destroyed their debates in person
So they HATE their nephew or niece
They can’t stand aunt Betty
They can’t stand their shift mate at work
Their second cousin can’t be correct
That means they don’t have the FACTS to win that debate in person
So OWNING THAT DEBATE is impossible
So they watch fox spew FAKE takes on what the left believes and the crap fox concocts to “OWN” the libs
So they NEVER have to admit to themselves that they have been wrong all along
Stupid silly childish crap instead of facts
Pathetic thinking
Guess where all that gets them
Bad information in means bad decisions out
They have committed their lives to being failed losers
Doc Dutch (03-06-2021)
Maybe because it didn't meet the legal definition of gross negligence.
gross negligence
n. carelessness which is in reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, and is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people's rights to safety. It is more than simple inadvertence, but it is just shy of being intentionally evil. If one has borrowed or contracted to take care of another's property, then gross negligence is the failure to actively take the care one would of his/her own property. If gross negligence is found by the trier of fact (judge or jury), it can result in the award of punitive damages on top of general and special damages.
https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=838
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
Another stupid righty thread. Can anyone show a book being burned? They are kids books. They are not political books. They were just written at a time that some racist caricatures were common. The people who owned them thought they were doing something wrong and decided to stop publishing them. The left had nothing at all to do with it. It was a Suess family decision. The left did not know it was happening until it did and then we were told it was our fault. Want a hoax, this is a good one.
The legal definition in the link says it does, dumbass. You should try reading the links, Legion. It makes you look fucking stupid when you don't.
Like you looked fucking stupid on the SF tent thread when you claimed the tents were paid for by Federal taxes or your idiotic Anonymous threads:
"Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"
The "legal definition in the link" isn't germane to this issue, angry boi.
Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook/
Many other did exactly what Hilary did with a server
For some fucking reason it was only treated as a crime when she did it
Hum weird
Bookmarks