Are the Trumpkins still looking for fraud?
LMAO.
Help! The sky is falling.
The election was stolen.
The country is dissolving.
My retirement fund is disappearing.
The country is collapsing.
AOC will take over the world and force everybody to speak Mexican.
Give it a rest, TinFoul. Nobody believes your doom and gloom scenario or your Chicken Little Scare Tactics. It's an old right wing ploy that's so lame, it just highlights your desperation.
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Are the Trumpkins still looking for fraud?
LMAO.
DEMOCRATS DEMAND UNIVERSAL MAIL VOTING. NOW THEY ARE PASSING A LAW THAT REQUIRES IT.
Mail-in voting is a throwback to the dark old days of vote-buying and fraud. Because of this, many countries don’t allow in-country absentee ballots.
Concerns about vote-buying and fraud have a long history in the U.S.
They helped drive the move to the secret ballot, which U.S. states adopted between 1888 and 1950.
Secret ballots made it harder for vote buyers to monitor which candidates sellers actually voted for.
Vote-buying had been pervasive; research at the University of Florida has found that voter turnout fell by 8% to 12% after states adopted the secret ballot.
DEMOCRATS now claim that voter fraud is essentially nonexistent. The Carter report found otherwise.
Intimidation and vote buying were key concerns of the Carter commission: “Citizens who vote at home, at nursing homes, at the workplace, or in church are more susceptible to pressure, overt and subtle, or to intimidation. Vote buying schemes are far more difficult to detect when citizens vote by mail.”
The report provides examples, such as the 1997 Miami mayoral election that resulted in 36 arrests for absentee-ballot fraud. The election had to be rerun, and the result was reversed.
There are more recent cases, too.
In 2017 an investigation of a Dallas City Council election found over 700 fraudulent mail-in ballots signed by the same witness using a fake name. The discovery left two council races in limbo, and the fraud was much larger than the vote differential in one of those races. The case resulted in criminal convictions.
It is often claimed that impossibly large numbers of people live at the same address.
In 2016, 83 registered voters in San Pedro, Calipornia, received absentee ballots at the same small two-bedroom apartment.
Since politically-motivated prosecutors in Blue urban shitholes rarely pursue this type of case, DEMOCRAT "fact-checkers" claim that fraud is nonexistent, and leftists swallow and regurgitate the lie because it fits their agenda.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/heed-jimmy-carter-on-the-danger-of-mail-in-voting-11586557667
You guys had over 60 cracks at proving your case in the courts, you fell on your face every time, and I see some of you have still not learned a darn thing. Looks like Rudy, and few others, will get their chance to prove their lies are actually truth in the courts or pay Big Bucks for their Lies, wanna bet if they end up paying.....
Your boy has been lying to you for years now and he is still lying to you, and at this point anyone that still believes the Big Lie is probably already dead from the neck up and anything they say should be ignored as nothing more than ramblings from the Far Side.
Loosen your tinfoil, it is cutting off the blood supply.
Have a Great Day
THEY WERE AGAINST MAIL VOTING BEFORE THEY WERE FOR IT
From ultra-liberal Slate, in 2016:
Voter fraud does happen. As election law expert and occasional Slate contributor Rick Hasen has explained, voter fraud occurs through absentee ballots.
The vast majority of voter fraud prosecutions involve absentee ballots that were illegally cast.
The only voting fraud schemes with the potential to actually swing elections involved mail-in ballots. This makes sense: It’s much easier to forge a signature, impersonate a voter, or buy a vote in the privacy of one’s home than it is in a voting booth at the polls.
If Republicans were truly serious about eradicating voter fraud, they would severely restrict absentee voting, permitting it only when voters have a good excuse, like illness. Why don’t they do so? Because absentee ballots are widely considered to favor Republicans.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/09/voter-fraud-exists-through-absentee-ballots-but-republicans-wont-stop-it.html
https://www.judicialwatch.org/tom-fittons-weekly-update/judicial-watch-study/
Gwinnett County in suburban Atlanta had to mail out absentee ballots with information in both English and Spanish in 2018.
The result was chaos. The county accommodated the increased text by printing it in 6.5-point font, making each letter smaller than a sesame seed. Many voters were confused by the instructions — in particular, that they had to sign the back of the yellow envelope before returning it or their votes wouldn’t count.
Gwinnett rejected 595 absentee ballots, a third of all those tossed in Georgia, often without notifying the spurned voters. Only a hurried lawsuit by the ACLU forced the county to reexamine the discarded ballots.
The debacle caused in Gwinnett by this relatively minor tweak presents a cautionary lesson for election administrators amid a pandemic-driven flurry of calls for a massive expansion of voting by mail.
DEMOCRATS Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., introduced legislation this month to promote and help fund mail-in ballot efforts, and several states are mulling whether to conduct elections by mail.
“In light of the threats that this virus poses, every American should be able to cast a ballot by mail without excuse,” Klobuchar and Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., wrote Friday, urging Congress to include funding for vote-by-mail elections in emergency packages.
"That means states will have to scale their vote-by-mail processes in a way that hasn’t been done before."
https://www.propublica.org/article/voting-by-mail-would-reduce-coronavirus-transmission-but-it-has-other-risks
Your article is losing its shit over the fact that 1.8M people registered to vote between 2016 and 2020.
I have news for you...it's actually much higher than that.
PA added 922,000 new registered voters itself between 2016-2020, which is more than half the number you're soiling your diaper over here.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Over 1.21 billion people are enrolled in the world’s largest biometric identification system.
The Indian government’s Aadhaar identification initiative has now reached a new milestone. Almost eight years after the first Aadhaar card was issued (in September 2010), the total number of enrollees in the program has crossed 1.21 billion, according to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI).
According to the 2011 Census, this is what India’s population was at the time.
According to official projections from the UIDAI, nearly 92% of India’s current population now has an Aadhar card.
The data suggests that Indian residents who are still without Aadhaar cards are mostly children.
https://www.businessinsider.in/over-1-21-billion-people-are-enrolled-in-the-worlds-largest-biometric-identification-system/articleshow/65009409.cms
Bookmarks