https://www.edgarfamilylaw.com/blog/...f%20California.Is Common Law Marriage the Same as Domestic Partnership?
No. California allows domestic partnerships between any couples who wish to have one. A domestic partnership isn’t a marriage. Instead, couples with domestic partnerships do so to get certain benefits usually associated with marriage, such as being able to receive a partner’s state-administered health benefits. To learn more about domestic partnership in California,
https://www.edgarfamilylaw.com/blog/...or-same-sex-c/According to Section 297 of the California Family Code, “Domestic partners are two adults who have chosen to share one another’s lives in an intimate and committed relationship of mutual caring.”
Domestic partnership offers couples who do not want to get married a way of having their relationship recognized in the eyes of the law, which can have key legal and financial benefits. In fact, some people believe that California’s new domestic partnership laws will result in more heterosexual couples choosing this option over marriage, for personal, religious, or other reasons.
Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!
THE BIG LIE - Blacks and whites are different physically but identical mentally!
There is no way 81 million americans voted for a man they know is a child molester w dementia. Impeach Joe the Pedophile Vegetable (JPV)
And a monkey and a tree and ... an idiot who thinks anyone respects him.
http://lawzilla.com/content/polygamy...Sister%20Wives.California law makes it a crime to marry more than one person.
The law, however, has not been tested on constitutional grounds. There is an 1878 U.S. Supreme Court decision arising from Utah that held the First Amendment does not prohibit a statute outlawing polygamy. Other possible challenges to anti-polygamy laws, such as recently seen with challenges to anti-gay marriage laws, remain untested in the courts. For example, challenges per the due process or equal protection clauses of the US Constitution.
So, it's illegal but might be challenged on constitutional grounds. I'd say they're skating on thin ice.
AProudLefty (03-03-2021)
Bookmarks