Just an FYI... Rule 14... If all you do is follow someone around...

[Damocles]

If all you do is follow 1 or 2 posters around to harass them Rule 14 will apply and you will not have an account for long.

Even if you try to pepper your harassment with an occasional "real" post about politics, if you continue to follow just one or two posters around to harass them we will take some action.

14. The treatment of Incendiary Troll accounts. Definition: Posting solely for reaction, to harass, or stalk. Whether single or secondary, those accounts posting solely for reaction and/or harassment and not contributing to the discussion in any way post at the sole discretion of the JPP Admin Team and may be removed at any moment.

I added the bold, but this is the rule I am talking about.

If you are worried, then I am talking to you.

[Doc Dutch]

If all you do is follow 1 or 2 posters around to harass them Rule 14 will apply and you will not have an account for long.

Even if you try to pepper your harassment with an occasional "real" post about politics, if you continue to follow just one or two posters around to harass them we will take some action.



I added the bold, but this is the rule I am talking about.

If you are worried, then I am talking to you.

I'd offer betting a $20 JPP donation that this is about Jits, but since you'd be the one checking the cards, I won't.

[Matt Dillon]

I'd offer betting a $20 JPP donation that this is about Jits, but since you'd be the one checking the cards, I won't.

Never follow your intuition. Because yours sucks donkey balls.
Now if you'd like to know the next time cultsmasher is around before the mods get him, I can do that.
Maybe..
Dude, my earliest internet experiences involved being able to tell who somebody was no matter what their screen name was.

I used to give out <>< like candy.

[Underdog]

I'd offer betting a $20 JPP donation that this is about Jits, but since you'd be the one checking the cards, I won't.

speaking of "Serial stalking"

[Lightbringer]

If all you do is follow 1 or 2 posters around to harass them Rule 14 will apply and you will not have an account for long.

Even if you try to pepper your harassment with an occasional "real" post about politics, if you continue to follow just one or two posters around to harass them we will take some action.



I added the bold, but this is the rule I am talking about.

If you are worried, then I am talking to you.

Oh yeah, no worries comes off the ban today. Thanks for reminding me. Message received I'll play nice now.

[RB 60]

Oh yeah, no worries comes off the ban today. Thanks for reminding me. Message received I'll play nice now.

[no worries]

Oh yeah, no worries comes off the ban today. Thanks for reminding me. Message received I'll play nice now.

Good.

Didn't think you cared.

Evidently, my definition of a Teaba**er (www.teaparty.org) was different than theirs.

A sexual act?

Who would have thought but it's true.

[Doc Dutch]

Good.

Didn't think you cared.

Evidently, my definition of a Teaba**er (www.teaparty.org) was different than theirs.

A sexual act?

Who would have thought but it's true.

Republican Tea Party members came up with "Teabagger" and the Democrats ran with it like they stole it. Kinda like the Birther thing. LOL

I fail to see why calling a Tea Party member a "Teabagger" is worse than calling a Trump fan a "Trump cocksucker".

[no worries]

Republican Tea Party members came up with "Teabagger" and the Democrats ran with it like they stole it. Kinda like the Birther thing. LOL

I fail to see why calling a Tea Party member a "Teabagger" is worse than calling a Trump fan a "Trump cocksucker".

Someone, likely a wing nut, brought to the mods attention, SNOWFLAKES.

[Lightbringer]

Someone, likely a wing nut, brought to the mods attention, SNOWFLAKES.

Someone...likely you

[Doc Dutch]

Someone, likely a wing nut, brought to the mods attention, SNOWFLAKES.

Reporting is fine. Play by the rules, die by the rules. I'm good with it. What I don't understand is why calling someone a Teabagger is worse than calling them a toe-tapping Republican cocksucker.

[Althea]

Republican Tea Party members came up with "Teabagger" and the Democrats ran with it like they stole it. Kinda like the Birther thing. LOL

I fail to see why calling a Tea Party member a "Teabagger" is worse than calling a Trump fan a "Trump cocksucker".

Unless the term is used in conjunction with mention of a child, I see no reason why it would be ban material?

[Doc Dutch]

Unless the term is used in conjunction with mention of a child, I see no reason why it would be ban material?

I don't know all of the circumstances. There are multiple scenarios including the dark ones. My best guess is the "last straw" scenario. It was't "teabagger" alone that resulted in the ban. It was the cumulative result of a lot of things. Again, I have no evidence or knowledge of that actual circumstances.

All I do know is that, by my year long experience here, the rules are pretty loose and anyone one who doesn't heed warnings is an idiot who deserves what they receive.

BTW, anyone who doesn't like it can ask for a refund and apply it to their next forum.

[Althea]

Good.

Didn't think you cared.

Evidently, my definition of a Teaba**er (www.teaparty.org) was different than theirs.

A sexual act?

Who would have thought but it's true.

You got banned for using the term?

I've seen that about 2 thousand times here.

[no worries]

You got banned for using the term?

I've seen that about 2 thousand times here.

They stated 12b rule, now I'm using a disclaimer Teabagger (www.teaparty.org)

They might frown on that too, I'll see.