Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 96

Thread: He's acting like someone else is running the USA

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    So you say, Anchovies.

    Even Zappacrite knows that arguing by attempting to discredit a source is fallacious.



    Poor Anchovies.
    He’s wrong, facts are facts, but the way you frame those facts in your presentation effects your credibility, even the “Onion” usually starts out with one fact

    And “townhall” is not a reliable source, like most of the sources you like, and often try to hide, it takes facts and presents them exactly as you want to hear them regardless of validity

    Called common sense

  2. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (03-02-2021)

  3. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    He’s wrong, facts are facts, but the way you frame those facts in your presentation effects your credibility, even the “Onion” usually starts out with one fact And “townhall” is not a reliable source, like most of the sources you like, and often try to hide, it takes facts and presents them exactly as you want to hear them regardless of validity Called common sense
    Your opinion on the matter has been weighed and found wanting, Anchovies.

    The genetic fallacy is a logical fallacy in which someone accepts a claim as true or false solely on the basis of its origin. There are a number of different types of genetic fallacies, and they occur particularly often in the political arena, as well as in discussions on various controversial issues. It’s a common debate tactic to direct the focus on the source of an argument instead of attacking the argument itself.

    https://fallacyinlogic.com/genetic-fallacy-definition-and-examples/

    Poor Anchovies.

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    24,406
    Thanks
    2,522
    Thanked 14,824 Times in 8,868 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 896 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    What has this desiccated old weirdo achieved in his six weeks of semiconsciousness in the Oval Office?

    This is a failed presidency. He has done nothing. He has accomplished nothing. He is nothing, in the sense that he’s an afterthought to the whole endeavor. His job is to sign the executive orders, not to think them up or prepare them or even read them before he scrawls his X on them.

    They called a lid on his whole term back on January 21 and it doesn’t get lifted until Kamala Harris finishes pulling off her 25th Amendment flex.



    https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2021/03/01/this-administration-is-already-a-failure-n2585441
    ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
    Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch

  5. The Following User Groans At Bourbon For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (03-02-2021)

  6. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Posting links that you may or may not have read proves nothing. I'm glad we shared this teachable moment, Anchovies.
    It is evidence there “copy,” proof that you are incorrect, again, which is obvious the way you are attempting to get around it

  7. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (03-02-2021)

  8. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Americans are being subjected to the uncertainty of a person with serious mental issues serving in the most important position in the world.

    Ever since his inauguration, Biden has been making frequent misstatements and obvious gaffes.

    The most recent episodes occurred on Friday.

    Earlier in the day, he forgot to put on a mask after finishing a speech.

    Then, after a trip to Houston, TX, Biden made a series of troubling statements.

    He referred to Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) as “Shirley.”

    Also, he mispronounced the name of Congresswoman Lizzie Pannill Fletcher (D-TX) twice.

    After the mistakes, he asked, “What am I doing here?”

    https://townhall.com/columnists/jeffcrouere/2021/02/28/countdown-to-kamala-n2585453

  9. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    It is evidence there “copy,” proof that you are incorrect, again, which is obvious the way you are attempting to get around it
    So you say, Anchovies, yet you failed to cite any examples.

    Poor Anchovies.

  10. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Burpin' View Post
    It's obvious.

    Have another drink.

  11. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Your opinion on the matter has been weighed and found wanting, Anchovies.

    The genetic fallacy is a logical fallacy in which someone accepts a claim as true or false solely on the basis of its origin. There are a number of different types of genetic fallacies, and they occur particularly often in the political arena, as well as in discussions on various controversial issues. It’s a common debate tactic to direct the focus on the source of an argument instead of attacking the argument itself.

    https://fallacyinlogic.com/genetic-fallacy-definition-and-examples/

    Poor Anchovies.
    Already educated you on how you are totally misusing your “genetic fallacy” escape clause, you really don’t understand the concept, if one were to post the “Onion” as an authoritative source another quickly dismissed it you are telling us that would be a “genetic fallacy.”

  12. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (03-02-2021)

  13. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Nasty Nancy Pelosi’s decision to convene a committee last year to discuss the 25th amendment was about replacing Biden with Shamala Hairless.

    It looks like the DEMOCRATS are ready to depose the old man already.

    Pelosi’s 25th Amendment bill is about replacing Biden with Harris

    https://nypost.com/2020/10/09/trump-pelosis-25th-amendment-bill-about-replacing-biden-with-harris/

  14. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    Already educated you on how you are totally misusing your “genetic fallacy” escape clause, you really don’t understand the concept, if one were to post the “Onion” as an authoritative source another quickly dismissed it you are telling us that would be a “genetic fallacy.”
    So you say, Anchovies. Your weak protestations are insubstantive.

    The genetic fallacy (also known as the fallacy of origins or fallacy of virtue) is a fallacy of irrelevance that is based solely on someone's or something's history, origin, or source rather than its current meaning or context. This overlooks any difference to be found in the present situation, typically transferring the positive or negative esteem from the earlier context. In other words, a claim is ignored in favor of attacking or championing its source.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy

    Poor Anchovies.

  15. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    So you say, Anchovies, yet you failed to cite any examples.

    Poor Anchovies.
    “examples?” I supplied to you a whole list of examples, which I said not only listed each action but even went further to break it down by subject, can’t do any better than that, one can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it ...........

  16. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    So you say, Anchovies. Your weak protestations are insubstantive.

    The genetic fallacy (also known as the fallacy of origins or fallacy of virtue) is a fallacy of irrelevance that is based solely on someone's or something's history, origin, or source rather than its current meaning or context. This overlooks any difference to be found in the present situation, typically transferring the positive or negative esteem from the earlier context. In other words, a claim is ignored in favor of attacking or championing its source.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy

    Poor Anchovies.
    That’s pretty funny, your “protestations are insubstantive,” what, you got a new thesaurus. Attempting to cover up your lack of understanding of Logic with a new vocabulary

    Not “protestations” nor “insubstantive,” just the reality

    Not “protest

  17. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (03-02-2021)

  18. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    “examples?” I supplied to you a whole list of examples, which I said not only listed each action but even went further to break it down by subject, can’t do any better than that, one can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it ...........
    Poor Anchovies.

    Posting a link without citing any relevant text that might support your point is the act of an intellectual inadequate.

    Even kids know that.

    State the idea you had about the text (if you are responding to a specific question, be sure your idea restates the question). Now give supporting evidence from the text. To cite explicitly, paraphrase or use quotes from the text.

    http://www.warrencountyschools.org/userfiles/2607/textual%20evidence%20powerpoint.pdf

    Poor Anchovies.

  19. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    That’s pretty funny, your “protestations are insubstantive,” what, you got a new thesaurus. Attempting to cover up your lack of understanding of Logic with a new vocabulary Not “protestations” nor “insubstantive,” just the reality
    Not “protest
    Your weak arguments are unconvincing for a reason, Anchovies.

    You've still avoided any discussion of the thread topic. I suspect it's because you are unequal to the task.

    Poor Anchovies.

  20. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    2,358
    Thanks
    191
    Thanked 771 Times in 575 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 84 Times in 79 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpet View Post
    You're probably right about attention whore, but I do find him comical.
    Yes, but I've got no doubt you would find the fact that the so-called "Biden administration" is currently being run by clique of neo-Marxist/Postmodernists ideologues, (who are all Democrat members of Congress/ the "Deep State"), was not comical in the slightest. If, that is, you undertood what I am talking about; but you do not.


    Dachshund

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Dachshund For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (03-02-2021)

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •