Goya Foods CEO falsely says election was illegitimate, Trump is 'the real, the legiti

[Legion]

All the USA courts and the FBI says it was fine

They do?

LINK

[Matt Dillon]

I wish you were, but I doubt you will be.

I think I am.

[christiefan915]

Are you claiming to have read it?

Yes, I read it. Or shall I say, struggled through her turgid and hackneyed prose.

[Matt Dillon]

Where will the votes come from to defeat H.R. 1 and S 1?

Non-traitorous people that were elected as Democrats.
There may not be many, but there may be enough.

[Matt Dillon]

Nonexistent, AFAIK.

I knows me a little summin'.

[tinfoil]

A RIGHT wing idiot

LOL yeah, that must be it

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

All the USA courts and the FBI says it was fine


You just do deep reaches up trumps ass instead of using facts


Wash your elbows


That was a deep reach turd miner

all usa courts have ruled on this matter? like all scientists believe agw garbage?

you're getting dumber.

[christiefan915]

Did you review it on Goodreads?

I had to go and check. Unfortunately, no. I could probably do a retro though.

[christiefan915]

We'll never know unless the courts agree to hear it, will we?

Why won't they agree to hear it, O Minister of Misinformation?

[christiefan915]

BadBoi says that's not how it works, or something.

He's saying you can't prove a negative, unless you'd care to disabuse us of that idea.

[christiefan915]

Didn't you claim that you don't have a Goodreads account?

Did I?

LINK

[christiefan915]

Is he?

He refuses to provide proof that the 2020 election is legitimate.

Nobody has proved that it's not legitimate and that's the real issue.

[Matt Dillon]

all usa courts have ruled on this matter? like all scientists believe agw garbage?

you're getting dumber.

[Legion]

Nobody has proved that it's not legitimate and that's the real issue.

Is it?

So you can't prove it was legitimate either?

And didn't you claim that you don't have a Goodreads account?

[Legion]

Legitimacy is a crucial aspect of all power relations.

Without legitimacy, power is exerted through coercion; with legitimacy, power can be exerted through voluntary or quasi-voluntary compliance.

This holds for both power exerted by a state (Levi, 1997; Beetham, 1991; Hurd ,1999; Tyler, 2006; Kelman & Hamilton, 1989) and by armed non-state groups (Maher, 2012).

Thus legitimacy can be understood as an acceptance of authority by both elite and non-elite groups, although not all citizens are equal in their capacity to confer legitimacy.

Legitimacy lies at the core of state-citizen relationships and thus of the whole state-building agenda. The logic used in the state-building agenda is that an authority which lacks legitimacy will be challenged, resulting in increased instability.

If states are legitimate, they use fewer resources to coerce, have more resources to devote to improving governance and can rely on citizens’ consent even when certain groups disagree about policies. Levi and Sacks explored the relationship between citizens’ perceptions that government is relatively effective, competent, and procedurally just, and their stated willingness to engage in quasi-voluntary compliance.


https://gsdrc.org/topic-guides/the-legitimacy-of-states-and-armed-non-state-actors/key-language-and-concepts/the-importance-of-understanding-legitimacy/