Got proof now, QAnon doesn’t exist,

[archives]

“Tucker Carlson Spent 'All Day Trying to Locate the Famous QAnon' and Found Nothing”

“Fox News host Tucker Carlson has said that after an entire day of searching online, he and his staff were unable to "locate the famous QAnon”

“We spent all day trying to locate the famous QAnon, which, in the end, we learned is not even a website. If it's out there, we could not find it”

“Then, we checked Marjorie Taylor Greene's Twitter feed because we have heard she traffics in disinformation, but nothing there," he continued. "Next, we called our many friends in the tight-knit intel community. Could Vladimir Putin be putting this stuff out there? The Proud Boys? Alex Jones?"

"Who is lying to America in ways that are certain to make us hate each other and certain to destroy our core institutions?" Carlson concluded. "Well, none of the above”

https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carl...othing-1571524

QAnon doesn’t exist, all a media hoax, must be kinda like Covid

And the embarrassing part is that Tucker, like all the Fox/radio demagogues, pedals this kind of shit knowing it isn’t true and that the vast majority of his audience will still believe him, called pimping hate to make a buck

[AProudLefty]

Perhaps Friar Tucker should try duckduckgo?

[CASPER]

He spent a whole day, so much work......

[Damocles]

Who is going to be first to take the sock name now?

"What? I'm not non-existent!"

[AProudLefty]

QNothing.

[AProudLefty]

He spent a whole day, so much work......

I found three sites within a few seconds.

[Nordberg]

Qanon has fans on this board. They exist.

[Stone]

Tucker is correct. There is no Q anon. There is Q and then there are Anons. Something that has been explained already what seems like must have been hundreds of times...

Btw....I know who Q is. Might as well spill the beans now. You ready? Q is actually.............BATMAN!

[AProudLefty]

Tucker is correct. There is no Q anon. There is Q and then there are Anons. Something that has been explained already what seems like must have been hundreds of times...

Btw....I know who Q is. Might as well spill the beans now. You ready? Q is actually.............BATMAN!

Nope. Q is actually Legion.

[NiftyNiblick]

Tucker Carlson.
Sean Hannity.
Please give me a fucking break.

I mean really, I clearly remember network news broadcasts in the 1950s. I was young, but I remember nonetheless.
Guys like that wouldn't have been allowed on air to sell Old Gold or Cavalier cigarettes during the commercial breaks. Grossly inadequate professionalism, the execs would say.
But that's where we are today...total buffoons getting a national forum, not only to disseminate nonsense, but to have the effrontery to present it as news.

We're trying, with little success, to preserve a republic in that environment.

[Stone]

#4881 - 2020-10-17 18:36:26 (UTC+1)

There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q

[Stone]

#4850 - 2020-10-14 04:03:29 (UTC+1)
What happens when too many people don't buy what they are selling?
What happens when too many people wake up?
What happens when they lose control of the digital battlefield?
Mr. Russia collusion pusher himself now involved?
[knowingly]
Q

[AProudLefty]

#4881 - 2020-10-17 18:36:26 (UTC+1)

There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q

What do you suggest calling them? The Q Team? The Anons of Q?

[CASPER]

What do you suggest calling them? The Q Team? The Anons of Q?

The Quacks

[Phantasmal]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...amp/ncna900531

This is a good article on the subject.