Dark day for SCOTUS

[Nordberg]

Election fraud is not a thing. Rightys should be ashamed for making those terrible claims. https://apnews.com/article/virus-out...9fe115579570b4

[domer76]

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.

[domer76]

Prove it.



Yet here you are.

Is this now 61, 62, 63 failed cases? More?

[Althea]

I don't believe Trump was expecting to overturn the election result, in this or any of his other lawsuits. He's not that much of a fool. He wanted to make enough "noise" so that his followers could say he was robbed. And here they are - doing it.

He was using the hysteria to raise almost $1 billion. Nothing more.

[signalmankenneth]

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.

[ThatOwlWoman]

This is your court, my dear. You cheered as each of the 3 justices nominated by Trump were sworn in. You cant have it both ways. This is your conservative majority at work.

Deliciously, delightfully, and indescribably true.

[Darth Omar]

Deliciously, delightfully, and indescribably true.

You’re prepared to go 0-whatever vs the Bad Orange Man lol?

[MAGA MAN]

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.

Not unexpected- courts do that all the time. "What do you expect us to do, overturn an election?" Judges at every level leave their balls at home.

Now we get to sit back and read all the bullshit from the libs here about how Trump was 'laughed out of court" or similar.

[Darth Omar]

Not unexpected- courts do that all the time. "What do you expect us to do, overturn an election?" Judges at every level leave their balls at home.

Now we get to sit back and read all the bullshit from the libs here about how Trump was 'laughed out of court" or similar.

Wouldn’t even look at the evidence because it’s ‘moot’.

Thomas wrote a good dissent about how the court[s] refusing to intervene will come back and haunt the country in future elections.

[archives]

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.

Are you aware that the case was asking the Court on behalf of the Pennsylvania Legislature to declare unconstitutional the mail in ballot rules that the very same Pennsylvania Legislature approved and passed something like six months earlier? The Court should have thrown the case out even before it reached a hearing consideration, it was inane

And they actually did Trump a favor by not ruling on his tax case until now, it was the second go around for the same case and they delayed any ruling till after the election

[Darth Omar]

These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.

One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. [Clarence Thomas dissent]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/...21zor_2cp3.pdf

[American Man]

This is your court, my dear. You cheered as each of the 3 justices nominated by Trump were sworn in. You cant have it both ways. This is your conservative majority at work.

Agreed.

[Diesel]

Right now, DEMOCRATS are passing what they euphemistically call a "rights" bill to make sure that their Party can never lose another election.

Then there's this:

Biden’s commission on court reform is likely to recommend sweeping changes to the judiciary system, including an expansion of lower courts.

The commission, which Biden announced on the campaign trail, came after activists pressured him to dilute the influence former President Donald Trump exerted on the courts through judicial nominations.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-commission-court-expansion-term-limits

They are also looking at retroactive term limits to remove judges appointed by Trump.

Today I have seen you link Townhall and Washington Examiner. Do you have any concept at all of how fucking brainwashed you are?

[Diesel]

Even IF all the mail-in votes that arrived after the election were fraudulent votes for Biden (and nobody has ever tried to establish that afaik), it STILL wouldn't overturn Biden's victory margin of more than 80,000 votes. “A decision would not have any implications regarding the 2020 election,” Justice Alito wrote.

I don't believe Trump was expecting to overturn the election result, in this or any of his other lawsuits. He's not that much of a fool. He wanted to make enough "noise" so that his followers could say he was robbed. And here they are - doing it.

They're also sending their unemployment checks to Trump's "legal fund".

[Legion]

Today I have seen you link Townhall and Washington Examiner.

Are you proud of your reading skills? Want a gold star?