Dark day for SCOTUS

[Darth Omar]

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.

[floridafan]

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.

This is your court, my dear. You cheered as each of the 3 justices nominated by Trump were sworn in. You cant have it both ways. This is your conservative majority at work.

[Althea]

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.

It's moot because trump got 100% of the ballots cast by dead people.

Time for you to move on.

[Darth Omar]

This is your court, my dear. You cheered as each of the 3 justices nominated by Trump were sworn in. You cant have it both ways. This is your conservative majority at work.

I’m embarrassed at their cowardly ‘hear no evil see no evil’ regardless of who put them there.

[Legion]

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday.

Mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten at the last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'manner' of federal elections, Yet both before and after the 2020 election, non-legislative officials in various states took it upon themselves to set the rules instead.

The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the DEMOCRAT-dominated Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days.

The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evidence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day.

These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority non-legislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle.

The refusal to do so is inexplicable.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/02/22/three-supreme-court-justices-believe-pennsylvania-election-case-should-be-review-n2585115

[Darth Omar]

It's moot because trump got 100% of the ballots cast by dead people.

Time for you to move on.

Why is it moot? Too late to change the results so democrats got away with one?

[Diesel]

This is a stain on the court.

They won’t even look at the evidence because the issue is ‘moot’? Moot to who? Even if there’s a scant possibility that illegal votes were cast in a national election the issue is not ‘moot’.

But apparently there ‘are more pressing concerns’ for the country, like clearing the road for a peak at Trump’s tax returns.

I’m literally embarrassed for this court.

It's the court you wanted. You should be embarrassed of yourself.

[Diesel]

I’m embarrassed at their cowardly ‘hear no evil see no evil’ regardless of who put them there.

They're judges and there was no election fraud. It's been more than three months. Get over it.

[Concart]

The court is staying in its lane. This is what Trumptards have wanted, and now they have it, and they are still whining like little babies. Tough shit. There was no fraud. Period. End of story. This subject is closed.

[Legion]

Why is it moot? Too late to change the results so democrats got away with one?

Right now, DEMOCRATS are passing what they euphemistically call a "rights" bill to make sure that their Party can never lose another election.

Then there's this:

Biden’s commission on court reform is likely to recommend sweeping changes to the judiciary system, including an expansion of lower courts.

The commission, which Biden announced on the campaign trail, came after activists pressured him to dilute the influence former President Donald Trump exerted on the courts through judicial nominations.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-commission-court-expansion-term-limits

They are also looking at retroactive term limits to remove judges appointed by Trump.

[Althea]

Why is it moot? Too late to change the results so democrats got away with one?

It has been shown over and over again that the claims were bogus...by Giuliani's admission in court. The courts have repeatedly stated that the amount of fraud necessary to overturn the election simply doesn't exist.

[Legion]

It has been shown over and over again that the claims were bogus...by Giuliani's admission in court. The courts have repeatedly stated that the amount of fraud necessary to overturn the election simply doesn't exist.

Is that so?

[Legion]

There was no fraud.

Prove it.

This subject is closed.

Yet here you are.

[floridafan]

I’m embarrassed at their cowardly ‘hear no evil see no evil’ regardless of who put them there.

Its gotta suck when they dont do absolutely everything you demand. Possibly they believe in the law?

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Why is it moot? Too late to change the results so democrats got away with one?

Even IF all the mail-in votes that arrived after the election were fraudulent votes for Biden (and nobody has ever tried to establish that afaik), it STILL wouldn't overturn Biden's victory margin of more than 80,000 votes. “A decision would not have any implications regarding the 2020 election,” Justice Alito wrote.

I don't believe Trump was expecting to overturn the election result, in this or any of his other lawsuits. He's not that much of a fool. He wanted to make enough "noise" so that his followers could say he was robbed. And here they are - doing it.