Frank Apisa (02-22-2021), signalmankenneth (02-22-2021), ThatOwlWoman (02-22-2021), Trumpet (02-22-2021)
Ruh-roh. Trump lost his SCOTUS appeal and the banks will have to turn over Trumps tax returns.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/22/polit...nce/index.html
I don't think Trump needs to worry about whether he's running for President in 2024. He'll be too busy running from Bubba.
This thread is to discuss the impact of this ruling on Donald Trump and the criminal Trump organization.
"The Supreme Court cleared the way for a New York prosecutor to obtain former President Donald Trump's tax returns, dealing a massive loss to Trump who has fiercely fought to shield his financial papers from prosecutors."
Frank Apisa (02-22-2021), signalmankenneth (02-22-2021), ThatOwlWoman (02-22-2021), Trumpet (02-22-2021)
This has to be a World Record
ONE-N-DONE, YOU GOT PLAYED; Time To Play-On
Remember ... ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES ... So STFU Bitch
Frank Apisa (02-22-2021), Trumpet (02-22-2021)
What a thing of beauty -- even his stacked court with hand-picked-for-loyalty Supremes wouldn't save his bacon.
I'm really looking forward to the criminal and civil proceedings.
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
signalmankenneth (02-22-2021), Trumpet (02-22-2021)
Tsk, tsk, tsk.
The words "chickens" "home" and "roost" all come to mind at this moment.
ON HIS WORST DAY, JOE BIDEN IS A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN TRUMP WAS ON HIS BEST DAY!
domer76 (02-22-2021), ThatOwlWoman (02-22-2021), Trumpet (02-22-2021)
ThatOwlWoman (02-22-2021)
ThatOwlWoman (02-22-2021)
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
ThatOwlWoman (02-22-2021)
THIS IS IT!!!
the bizarre, three-year litany of dreaming off impeachment, the emoluments clause, the Logan Act,
the 25th Amendment, the Mueller special-counsel investigation, Stormy Daniels and Michael Avenatti,
Trump’s tax returns, White Supremacy!, Recession! Russian oligarchs! Whistle Blower! Impeachment & Aquittal!
— and Lord knows what next — wait. Wu-Flu. Trump lied / people died.
I think it will depend a lot on the facts of the case. If it is a regulation that has already been ruled on I doubt if they take it; unless a lower court ruled contrary to precedent.
If it presents a different issue a "non-activist" court would defer to the judgment of the legislative body that made that law but they have to weigh that against precedent that regulations should not present an "undue burden" to women.
I sometimes wonder if the court might allow restrictions for less than 24 weeks since Roe was based on viability and medical advancements have been made in that area.
Bookmarks