42% of likely US voters think that the election was rigged

[domer76]

42% of likely US voters admit thinking the election was rigged

ftfy. And there's a reason we think that. It was.

Because you’re a delusional fuckwit.

Idiot.

[American Man]

There is no evidence of widespread, systematic voter fraud, though.

[moon]

42% of likely US voters think that the election was rigged

They should all refuse to vote next time.


Haw, haw.................................haw.

[Mott the Hoople]

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...elected_fairly

Yet the Democrats aren't interested in exploring the evidence. They just repeat the DNC narrative that there is no evidence. If they are so convinced it wasn't rigged, then why wouldn't they want to prove to 42% of likely voters that it wasn't?

We’ll probably because yours (and theirs) reasoning is illogical as hell.

The vast preponderance of evidence indicates that any incidents of electoral fraud were so small and so few as to be statistically insignificant let alone being of the scale required to swing an election.

So that being the case then no one is under any reasonable obligation to explore anything with you. Rather the burden of proof is yours to provide evidence that it did occur given all the available evidence indicates it did not.

So please provide us the objective and independently verifiable evidence that it did as we are under no obligation whatsoever to prove the converse. You are. Once you do then we can have a discussion and until you do there is nothing to discuss. Otherwise there is no basis on your behalf to even have a reasonable, rational and factual discussion as unless you meet the factual burden of proof.

The ball is in your court pal. Where’s the beef?

[Mott the Hoople]

An obvious question.

Their narrative rests on the idea that since Trump didn’t win in the courts and the election was declared ‘the cleanest in the history of the universe’ it’s a case of ‘nothing to see here, move along’.

If that’s the case, what do they have to lose? Nothing. In fact, it presents a wonderful opportunity for them to rub Trump supporters noses in the fact Biden won a fortified election.

And we all know how much they enjoy that. So let’s do it. Should have been done in the well of the Senate during the impeachment charade. Put the evidence on the table and allow people to decide for themselves whether it was a clean election or not.

Which is exactly why it won’t happen and why it didn’t happen.

Fine. Please do exactly that. Put the evidence you have up on the table and show us what you have.

[Mott the Hoople]

"They just repeat the DNC narrative that there is no evidence."

Fair enough. Show us the evidence.

[Mott the Hoople]

Curious as to why you wouldn't want to prove that in a public forum.

Because it has been. The large number of audits and recounts, both automated and by hand, provided no evidence at all of electoral fraud on a level that could swing an election. In fact the data demonstrated the reverse. That incidents of electoral fraud hardly occurred at all.

So this is a public forum. Go ahead and show us. What proof do you have?

[Mott the Hoople]

"They just repeat the DNC narrative that there is no evidence."

Again, fair enough. Show us the evidence.

[Darth Omar]

Fine. Please do exactly that. Put the evidence you have up on the table and show us what you have.

I haven’t gone over the thousand or so sworn affidavits which testify to fraud so I can’t very well ‘lay it in the table’. Have you gone over them?

The point is nearly half the country is suspicious of the outcome *and that fact alone* should be sufficient for an independent investigation of it.

The country spent three years investigating the Russian hoax and it was tied to the election of 2016 so I don’t think it’s an unreasonable request in light of that.

Besides, Democrats have nothing to lose, right?

[floridafan]

Kindly list the cases that have been lost. Because as I see it, none have been heard.

Prove that none have been heard!

[Iolo/Penderyn]

In Iran, foreign interference destroyed democracy and made the Shah Fuhrer, but didn't feel it could ban religion, so the only answer seemed to be to work through the mosque, giving the result we see. In the US McCarthyism banned the majority from even thinking about the real answers to their economic problems, leading to a fall in working people's real incomes, so ultimately they turned away from any logic at all and went for an incompetent nazi Fuhrer, believing in his nonsense totally, since they were denied any freedom of thought, giving the results we see in whole sections of the country. The Iran regime is far more difficult to get rid of, but probably a lot more of the Iranian people can see what they really want. Good luck to all thinking people, whatever.

[Doc Dutch]

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...elected_fairly

Yet the Democrats aren't interested in exploring the evidence. They just repeat the DNC narrative that there is no evidence. If they are so convinced it wasn't rigged, then why wouldn't they want to prove to 42% of likely voters that it wasn't?

Thanks for the link. Lots of data there.

[MAGA MAN]

We’ll probably because yours (and theirs) reasoning is illogical as hell.

The vast preponderance of evidence indicates that any incidents of electoral fraud were so small and so few as to be statistically insignificant let alone being of the scale required to swing an election.

So that being the case then no one is under any reasonable obligation to explore anything with you. Rather the burden of proof is yours to provide evidence that it did occur given all the available evidence indicates it did not.

So please provide us the objective and independently verifiable evidence that it did as we are under no obligation whatsoever to prove the converse. You are. Once you do then we can have a discussion and until you do there is nothing to discuss. Otherwise there is no basis on your behalf to even have a reasonable, rational and factual discussion as unless you meet the factual burden of proof.

The ball is in your court pal. Where’s the beef?

Let's see the Dominion software.

[MAGA MAN]

Again, fair enough. Show us the evidence.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethba...ctory-n2579670

[Mott the Hoople]

I haven’t gone over the thousand or so sworn affidavits which testify to fraud so I can’t very well ‘lay it in the table’. Have you gone over them?

The point is nearly half the country is suspicious of the outcome *and that fact alone* should be sufficient for an independent investigation of it.

The country spent three years investigating the Russian hoax and it was tied to the election of 2016 so I don’t think it’s an unreasonable request in light of that.

Besides, Democrats have nothing to lose, right?

So in other words you have no evidence and you want me to provide it for you?

That’s not how it works. The burden of proof is yours. Show me your evidence.