The Revolution is trying to provoke Right Violence

[Hawkeye10]

Bump

[NiftyNiblick]

its all over for your kind

Who doesn't love a good second line?

[Hawkeye10]

Bret and Heather have been talking about this for a long time...."It sure does look like they are trying to provoke violence and chaos, there is not another reasonable rational explanation (paraphrase)".

[Walt]

Nobody "owes" you anything. You pay nothing at all for this site.

Conspiracy Theories belong in the Conspiracy Theory area. Even if you think they are "supercalifraglimportant", and even if they are true (not judging value here, just putting the thread where it belonged).

I agree with you Damocles, but the State of Texas might disagree with you. In Texas, it is against the law for any Texans posts on a social media site to have their position altered based on the political content of the post. A judge in the case also argued that social media websites were not websites, so you can see the level of argument in this case.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

nah. everything is cool. trump is out of the picture.

trump is against china/banker globalist zealotry.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

I agree with you Damocles, but the State of Texas might disagree with you. In Texas, it is against the law for any Texans posts on a social media site to have their position altered based on the political content of the post. A judge in the case also argued that social media websites were not websites, so you can see the level of argument in this case.

so you're threatening damo, now?

you're a real piece of shit.

[SmarterthanYou]

I agree with you Damocles, but the State of Texas might disagree with you. In Texas, it is against the law for any Texans posts on a social media site to have their position altered based on the political content of the post. A judge in the case also argued that social media websites were not websites, so you can see the level of argument in this case.

are you of the mindset that there should be no fairness or equality in political representation when it concerns private internet sites?

[Concart]

So that they have an excuse to outlaw conservatives and all other resistance to the Revolution.

You have been warned.

Buckle up!!! This time, something is actually gonna happen. Or Hawkeye is just a mentally deranged retard. One of those.

[Walt]

are you of the mindset that there should be no fairness or equality in political representation when it concerns private internet sites?

Yes, I am of that mindset. There should be no "fairness" forced by the government on private internet sites. When we allow the government to force people to say what the government wants, we lose all our freedom.

Or put another way, should the government be allowed to regulate the "fairness" of what you say in your living room? I say you can limit who is allowed in your living room to just one political view. Is that "fair"?

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Yes, I am of that mindset. There should be no "fairness" forced by the government on private internet sites. When we allow the government to force people to say what the government wants, we lose all our freedom.

Or put another way, should the government be allowed to regulate the "fairness" of what you say in your living room? I say you can limit who is allowed in your living room to just one political view. Is that "fair"?

so you're a libertarian then?

I always say libertarians are globalist fascist sellouts.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Yes, I am of that mindset. There should be no "fairness" forced by the government on private internet sites. When we allow the government to force people to say what the government wants, we lose all our freedom.

Or put another way, should the government be allowed to regulate the "fairness" of what you say in your living room? I say you can limit who is allowed in your living room to just one political view. Is that "fair"?

corporations are perfectly able to respect free speech also.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Yes, I am of that mindset. There should be no "fairness" forced by the government on private internet sites. When we allow the government to force people to say what the government wants, we lose all our freedom.

Or put another way, should the government be allowed to regulate the "fairness" of what you say in your living room? I say you can limit who is allowed in your living room to just one political view. Is that "fair"?

and you were against the Disinformation Governance Board too, right?

walt you're such a disreputable lying hack.

your mind is in shambles, like your totalitarian fucko globalist fascist dem party.

only in your retard mind is guaranteeing free speech a form of oppression.

fucking idiot.