Let me begin with a question: Is yawning freedom of speech? It is not if you yawn at Democrat Party talking points.
The Democrats' alliance with social media to crack down on conservative voices apparently now is manifesting itself in the White House press office.
In a feature on how media friendly to former President Trump are trying to gain access to the Biden White House, Politico cited Biden's deputy press secretary making it clear that any news outlets that "traffic in conspiracy theories, propaganda and lies" will be forbidden.
Is yawing a conspiracy? It is every time an American yawns every time a Democrat lies on television.
Obviously, it is not a conspiracy when Biden (nee Obama) gives notorious liar Suzy Five Shows the job of cleaning White House toilets:
SEE VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/62264433...#sp=show-clips
After watching this next clip I had to admit that I am a conspirator —— I yawn every time a parasite invokes “a threat to our democracy”:
"Organizations or individuals who traffic in conspiracy theories, propaganda and lies to spread disinformation will not be tolerated, and we'll work with the WHCA to decide how to handle those instances moving forward," he said.
SECOND VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/62261052...#sp=show-clips
Let me jump to my personal conspiracy-exposés:
exposé (noun)
exposé (plural exposés)
1. The act of exposing somebody or something; a shameful showing up.
2. A publication of investigative journalism that reveals hidden and often scandalous truths.
3. A formal recital or exposition.
Five or six years ago Libs called every conservative message a conspiracy theory in an effort to have them deleted, or discredited them by moving conservative messages to a conspiracy forum. (Most political message boards include a conspiracy forum.) It was the lying sack of shit that found gold in Cass Sunstein’s crapola:
I knew that I, and a few others, made a dent when Obama’s man in Harvard felt so threatened he attacked freedom of speech on message boards. Basically, every swamp creature knows that political freedom of speech on message boards is a greater benefit to Americans than Twitter and Facebook combined:
Just prior to his appointment as President Obama’s so-called regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein wrote a lengthy academic paper suggesting the government should “infiltrate” social network websites, chat rooms and message boards. Such “cognitive infiltration,” Sunstein argued, should be used to enforce a U.S. government ban on “conspiracy theorizing.”
Such “cognitive infiltration,” Sunstein argued, should be used to enforce a U.S. government ban on “conspiracy theorizing.”
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...15#post3443715
Happily, Sunstein’s government ban on conspiracy theorizing never gained traction. Unfortunately, calling every word Democrats find offensive a conspiracy took on a new life on Biden’s orders from Obama.
Exposing democracy for what is has always been near and dear to my heart. My opinion of democracy stated many times included countless exposés:
The Democracy Movement preceded the U.N.’s so-called human Rights. The Democracy Movement was necessary in order to establish a global welfare state. In short: Involuntary tax dollar charity did not stand a chance on its own. Dressing democracy in a fool’s clothing made both possible.
Socialism/Communism will never die in this country as long the XVI Amendment supports the parasite class. On the day the XVI Amendment is repealed the Democracy Movement will fall into a coma because democracy lives forever like Count Dracula —— no matter how times a stake is driven in the bloodsucker’s heart he always returns to life. In plain English, the concept of democracy cannot be killed, but it can be buried so deep it will take centuries before it walks the land again.
The Democracy Movement is largely responsible for this country’s slow demise even though every political thinker and philosopher throughout history knew that democracy is the parasite’s preferred form of government.
The reason the concept of democracy lives forever is no secret —— every generation breeds democracy parasites who always attache themselves to every utopian scheme that comes down the pike. Leeching is in their genetic code.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...99#post4190599
NOTE: Only global government is a longer-running conspiracy then the Democracy Movement.
Finally, every Democrat Party policy, every behavior Democrats force on a free people, every lie Democrats tell has one objective —— EMPOWER & ENRICH THE PARASITE CLASS.
My point: Political parasites have been well-defined by numerous political thinkers like:
Indeed, T. J. surely understood the damage parasites do in every society:
I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious. Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Ludlow, September 6, 1824
yet there is no dictionary definition for Parasite Class while parasites have been a curse on civilization for at least as long as organized religion.
The absence of a definition for the Parasite Class makes me wonder why philosophers never ask which one of the two came first? Did parasites create organized religion? or did priests create parasites?
Bookmarks