Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: For those claiming the evidence was heard in court about election fraud!

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    11,869
    Thanks
    6,396
    Thanked 4,386 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Groans
    57
    Groaned 189 Times in 178 Posts

    Default For those claiming the evidence was heard in court about election fraud!

    Again Rand Paul sets you straight!

    https://trendingpolitics.com/watch-r...r-voter-fraud/

    Sen. Rand Paul laid down some smack on ABC’s resident Democratic operative, George Stephanopoulos, on Sunday as he pushed back against another liberal media attempt to legitimize aspects of the 2020 election that very likely cost President Trump a second term.

    And in doing so, the Kentucky Republican created a blueprint for other GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits not named Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse to use when disputing the false premise from Democrats and their media allies that during the last election cycle, ‘there is nothing to see here.’

    The back and forth culminated with Paul shutting down Stephanopolous by saying: “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”

    For his part, Stephanopoulos led with a false premise no one concerned about election integrity should ever accept: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”

    No, Paul responded, he doesn’t accept that.

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    “To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.

    “I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls.”

    The Democratic operative jumped in: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”

    See what he does here? Stephanopoulos expects Paul (and viewers) relies on flawed or incomplete processes in order to make his claim ‘there’s nothing to see here.’

    Watch the full segment below:

    Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Wolverine For This Post:

    MAGA MAN (01-27-2021)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine View Post
    Again Rand Paul sets you straight!

    https://trendingpolitics.com/watch-r...r-voter-fraud/

    Sen. Rand Paul laid down some smack on ABC’s resident Democratic operative, George Stephanopoulos, on Sunday as he pushed back against another liberal media attempt to legitimize aspects of the 2020 election that very likely cost President Trump a second term.

    And in doing so, the Kentucky Republican created a blueprint for other GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits not named Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse to use when disputing the false premise from Democrats and their media allies that during the last election cycle, ‘there is nothing to see here.’

    The back and forth culminated with Paul shutting down Stephanopolous by saying: “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”

    For his part, Stephanopoulos led with a false premise no one concerned about election integrity should ever accept: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”

    No, Paul responded, he doesn’t accept that.

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    “To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.

    “I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls.”

    The Democratic operative jumped in: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”

    See what he does here? Stephanopoulos expects Paul (and viewers) relies on flawed or incomplete processes in order to make his claim ‘there’s nothing to see here.’

    Watch the full segment below:

    Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.
    This has been explained to you before but your two goddamn stupid to get it. A lawyer has to convince the judge that the hearing needs to take place. When the judge asked the lawyer if there's any proof and the lawyer says no why would the judge waste the Court's time without any proof. This is exactly what happened in over 60 court cases. You're only real option now is to go in your mother's basement and take a nap.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to katzgar For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (01-27-2021)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    11,869
    Thanks
    6,396
    Thanked 4,386 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Groans
    57
    Groaned 189 Times in 178 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    This has been explained to you before but your two goddamn stupid to get it. A lawyer has to convince the judge that the hearing needs to take place. When the judge asked the lawyer if there's any proof and the lawyer says no why would the judge waste the Court's time without any proof. This is exactly what happened in over 60 court cases. You're only real option now is to go in your mother's basement and take a nap.
    Sen. Rand Paul laid down some smack on ABC’s resident Democratic operative, George Stephanopoulos, on Sunday as he pushed back against another liberal media attempt to legitimize aspects of the 2020 election that very likely cost President Trump a second term.

    And in doing so, the Kentucky Republican created a blueprint for other GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits not named Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse to use when disputing the false premise from Democrats and their media allies that during the last election cycle, ‘there is nothing to see here.’

    The back and forth culminated with Paul shutting down Stephanopolous by saying: “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”

    For his part, Stephanopoulos led with a false premise no one concerned about election integrity should ever accept: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”

    No, Paul responded, he doesn’t accept that.

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    “To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.

    “I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls.”

    The Democratic operative jumped in: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”

    See what he does here? Stephanopoulos expects Paul (and viewers) relies on flawed or incomplete processes in order to make his claim ‘there’s nothing to see here.’

    Watch the full segment below:

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.


    Since you struggle with understanding English!

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Dirty South
    Posts
    63,291
    Thanks
    6,234
    Thanked 13,406 Times in 10,036 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,947 Times in 2,728 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine View Post
    “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”
    It is not the job of journalists to present "both sides", it is the job of journalists to present the truth.

    The truth is the election wasn't stolen, but you believe it was because you were tricked into thinking that.

    You were tricked because you simply lack intuition and good instincts.
    When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist


  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,403 Times in 9,439 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Well, Rand Paul said it, so, it must be true. Those judges were all lying to us. Thank Goodness we have Super Rand to set the record straight.


  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine View Post
    Sen. Rand Paul laid down some smack on ABC’s resident Democratic operative, George Stephanopoulos, on Sunday as he pushed back against another liberal media attempt to legitimize aspects of the 2020 election that very likely cost President Trump a second term.

    And in doing so, the Kentucky Republican created a blueprint for other GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits not named Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse to use when disputing the false premise from Democrats and their media allies that during the last election cycle, ‘there is nothing to see here.’

    The back and forth culminated with Paul shutting down Stephanopolous by saying: “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”

    For his part, Stephanopoulos led with a false premise no one concerned about election integrity should ever accept: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”

    No, Paul responded, he doesn’t accept that.

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    “To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.

    “I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls.”

    The Democratic operative jumped in: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”

    See what he does here? Stephanopoulos expects Paul (and viewers) relies on flawed or incomplete processes in order to make his claim ‘there’s nothing to see here.’

    Watch the full segment below:

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.


    Since you struggle with understanding English!
    you lost, go take a nap

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine View Post
    Again Rand Paul sets you straight!

    https://trendingpolitics.com/watch-r...r-voter-fraud/

    Sen. Rand Paul laid down some smack on ABC’s resident Democratic operative, George Stephanopoulos, on Sunday as he pushed back against another liberal media attempt to legitimize aspects of the 2020 election that very likely cost President Trump a second term.

    And in doing so, the Kentucky Republican created a blueprint for other GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits not named Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse to use when disputing the false premise from Democrats and their media allies that during the last election cycle, ‘there is nothing to see here.’

    The back and forth culminated with Paul shutting down Stephanopolous by saying: “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”

    For his part, Stephanopoulos led with a false premise no one concerned about election integrity should ever accept: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”

    No, Paul responded, he doesn’t accept that.

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    “To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.

    “I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls.”

    The Democratic operative jumped in: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”

    See what he does here? Stephanopoulos expects Paul (and viewers) relies on flawed or incomplete processes in order to make his claim ‘there’s nothing to see here.’

    Watch the full segment below:

    Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    5,757
    Thanks
    3,941
    Thanked 3,338 Times in 2,286 Posts
    Groans
    827
    Groaned 633 Times in 549 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Try something besides trending politics. Anyone that uses a single source that much is going to be a brainwashed sap

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    11,869
    Thanks
    6,396
    Thanked 4,386 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Groans
    57
    Groaned 189 Times in 178 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Charoite View Post
    Try something besides trending politics. Anyone that uses a single source that much is going to be a brainwashed sap
    The source is Rand Paul!

    Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”



    Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    15,879
    Thanks
    6,790
    Thanked 9,168 Times in 5,906 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 593 Times in 557 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    This has been explained to you before but your two goddamn stupid to get it. A lawyer has to convince the judge that the hearing needs to take place. When the judge asked the lawyer if there's any proof and the lawyer says no why would the judge waste the Court's time without any proof. This is exactly what happened in over 60 court cases. You're only real option now is to go in your mother's basement and take a nap.
    When someone can't come to grips with the truth, i.e. no election fraud, it's due to delusional thinking where the person substitutes his delusions with the truth because the truth is too painful for him to accept.

    But, rest assured, 90% of Republicans now believe the election was fair and without fraud and Joe Biden is our legitimate president.

    Only 10% of Republicans still believe Trump's vote fraud hoax.

    Republican Congressman Ken Buck:
    “We’re at a time in American politics, that I am not going to lie on behalf of my presidential candidate, on behalf of my party. And I’m very sad that others in my party have taken the position that, as long as we get the White House, it doesn’t really matter what we say,”



  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Joe Capitalist For This Post:

    katzgar (01-27-2021)

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flaming Capitalist View Post
    When someone can't come to grips with the truth, i.e. no election fraud, it's due to delusional thinking where the person substitutes his delusions with the truth because the truth is too painful for him to accept.

    But, rest assured, 90% of Republicans now believe the election was fair and without fraud and Joe Biden is our legitimate president.

    Only 10% of Republicans still believe Trump's vote fraud hoax.

    the right wing continues to implode

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,035 Times in 13,845 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine View Post
    Again Rand Paul sets you straight!

    https://trendingpolitics.com/watch-r...r-voter-fraud/

    Sen. Rand Paul laid down some smack on ABC’s resident Democratic operative, George Stephanopoulos, on Sunday as he pushed back against another liberal media attempt to legitimize aspects of the 2020 election that very likely cost President Trump a second term.

    And in doing so, the Kentucky Republican created a blueprint for other GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits not named Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse to use when disputing the false premise from Democrats and their media allies that during the last election cycle, ‘there is nothing to see here.’

    The back and forth culminated with Paul shutting down Stephanopolous by saying: “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”

    For his part, Stephanopoulos led with a false premise no one concerned about election integrity should ever accept: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”

    No, Paul responded, he doesn’t accept that.

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    “To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.

    “I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls.”

    The Democratic operative jumped in: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”

    See what he does here? Stephanopoulos expects Paul (and viewers) relies on flawed or incomplete processes in order to make his claim ‘there’s nothing to see here.’

    Watch the full segment below:

    Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.
    First off, Paul didn't flat out say he thought the election was fraudulent, he deflected at that point, and second, his mistake, and seemingly yours also, is that yes, "there are two sides to every story," but that don't mean both sides are factual or valid

    Paul is also wrong, the evidence was examined, election fraud was investigated by the Justice Dept, don't you remember Billy Barr's unprecedented order that his field offices should look into election fraud, and we all know Billy Barr's conclusion based upon his own investigators findings

    Paul is just another contestant in Trump's 2024 President Apprentice show, he, along with Cruz, Hawley, and surely some more to jump in, are doing their best to kiss Trump's ass so they don't get thrown off the show in the early rounds

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,706
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,654 Times in 4,435 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine View Post
    Again Rand Paul sets you straight!

    https://trendingpolitics.com/watch-r...r-voter-fraud/

    Sen. Rand Paul laid down some smack on ABC’s resident Democratic operative, George Stephanopoulos, on Sunday as he pushed back against another liberal media attempt to legitimize aspects of the 2020 election that very likely cost President Trump a second term.

    And in doing so, the Kentucky Republican created a blueprint for other GOP lawmakers and conservative pundits not named Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse to use when disputing the false premise from Democrats and their media allies that during the last election cycle, ‘there is nothing to see here.’

    The back and forth culminated with Paul shutting down Stephanopolous by saying: “There are two sides to every story. George, you’re forgetting who you are. You’re forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there’s only one side.”

    For his part, Stephanopoulos led with a false premise no one concerned about election integrity should ever accept: “Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”

    No, Paul responded, he doesn’t accept that.

    “Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”

    “To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.

    “I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls.”

    The Democratic operative jumped in: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”

    See what he does here? Stephanopoulos expects Paul (and viewers) relies on flawed or incomplete processes in order to make his claim ‘there’s nothing to see here.’

    Watch the full segment below:

    Most federal courts didn’t even bother to look at the evidence presented by the president’s defense team nor did they even entertain arguments that voting rules were unconstitutionally changes by state executive branch officials.
    Rand Paul was wrong: https://www.factcheck.org/2021/01/pa...-fraud-debate/

    It is easy to check out the Wisconsin law.

Similar Threads

  1. 81 election fraud cases total - NO COURT has allowed presentation of evidence
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 01-26-2021, 12:28 PM
  2. Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence.??
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 130
    Last Post: 01-23-2021, 10:10 PM
  3. DIRECT EVIDENCE OF ELECTION FRAUD ON MICHIGAN VOTING MACHINES
    By gfm7175 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 12-15-2020, 01:26 PM
  4. Video evidence of election fraud
    By Evmetro in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 12-04-2020, 10:18 AM
  5. No Evidence' of Voter Fraud, Says Federal Election Commission Officials
    By Guno צְבִי in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 11-20-2020, 08:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •