More proof Trumpsexuals are traitors: Parler is back up on a Russian server

[Jerome]

It's unclear because social media didn't exist back then.

No. It's not unclear in the least.

[BattleofHodow]

No. It's not unclear in the least.

The Founding Fathers America was strict on Corporations.

It is unlikely they would have supported corporations over the 1st amendment.

https://reclaimdemocracy.org/corpora...rporations-us/

Our Hidden History of Corporations in the United States
When American colonists declared independence from England in 1776, they also freed themselves from control by English corporations that extracted their wealth and dominated trade. After fighting a revolution to end this exploitation, our country’s founders retained a healthy fear of corporate power and wisely limited corporations exclusively to a business role. Corporations were forbidden from attempting to influence elections, public policy, and other realms of civic society.

Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:

Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.
Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.
Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.
Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.
Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.
Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.
For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight control of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow.

[Jerome]

you spend way too much time trying to clarify definitions while not understanding the dynamics

Socialism is heavily regulated government control of the economy -that's as basic a definition as possible.

It is the government control of large sectors of the economy - not jut by law but by taxation as well -
that destroys economies. Venezuela is very pertinent -as it was a thriving state before socialism

University and HC are only 2 sectors. Health care is fine as single pay,
but shitty delivery when it's gonna be for evermore caravans of illegals as well as the aging population

you guys dont think these thing out -you just want it so

You're in way over your head. You don't know what you're talking about, you're typing too fast and making mistakes, and you're just repeating "Venezuela! Venezuela! Venezuela!" over and over, hoping it makes your point for you.

It won't.

[dukkha]

You're in way over your head. You don't know what you're talking about, you're typing too fast and making mistakes, and you're just repeating "Venezuela! Venezuela! Venezuela!" over and over, hoping it makes your point for you.

It won't.

sure dude.
you can't answer or debate so you rant. Typical dumb ass Progressive

[Jerome]

The Founding Fathers America was strict on Corporations.

It is unlikely they would have supported corporations over the 1st amendment.

https://reclaimdemocracy.org/corpora...rporations-us/

Our Hidden History of Corporations in the United States
When American colonists declared independence from England in 1776, they also freed themselves from control by English corporations that extracted their wealth and dominated trade. After fighting a revolution to end this exploitation, our country’s founders retained a healthy fear of corporate power and wisely limited corporations exclusively to a business role. Corporations were forbidden from attempting to influence elections, public policy, and other realms of civic society.

Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end. The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these*:

Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.
Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.
Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.
Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.
Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.
Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making.
For 100 years after the American Revolution, legislators maintained tight control of the corporate chartering process. Because of widespread public opposition, early legislators granted very few corporate charters, and only after debate. Citizens governed corporations by detailing operating conditions not just in charters but also in state constitutions and state laws. Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow.

The Founding Fathers are dead, and Supreme Court precedent makes very clear you're wrong.

You really wasted a lot of keystrokes there, fatty. Need a snack?

[Jerome]

sure dude.
you can't answer or debate so you rant. Typical dumb ass Progressive

There's no "debating" with people who think the sky is green, not blue. You're a delusional cultist; no point in engaging. Bye.

[dukkha]

There's no "debating" with people who think the sky is green, not blue. You're a delusional cultist; no point in engaging. Bye.

ha ha ha

get lost kid -you waste my time

[BattleofHodow]

The Founding Fathers are dead, and Supreme Court precedent makes very clear you're wrong.

You really wasted a lot of keystrokes there, fatty. Need a snack?

Capitalism has ruined America.

[Jerome]

ha ha ha

get lost kid -you waste my time

I wasn't even fucking talking to you. You're the one tugging on superman's cape, demanding attention.

[Jerome]

Capitalism has ruined America.

Uh, sure.

Wtf does that have to do with "free speech" again?

FYI, it's called First Amendment Jurisprudence. Seems like you ended formal schooling in 5th grade.

[BattleofHodow]

Uh, sure.

Wtf does that have to do with "free speech" again?

FYI, it's called First Amendment Jurisprudence. Seems like you ended formal schooling in 5th grade.

Because the Founding Fathers were anti Corporation to some extent & pro 1 st amendment.

It seems highly unlikely they'd support this nonsense.