Page 3 of 24 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 359

Thread: Why I doubt the election results

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I thoroughly enjoyed taunting lefties back in 2016 when Trump won with the majority of the kind of votes that matter, but unfortunately for lefties, they will never enjoy being able to enjoy the same taste of victory. Sure the transition of power thing is nice for lefties and all, but it is much more enjoyable to be able to flaunt real winning than it is to flaunt looted or stolen goods. Lefties will NEVER enjoy flaunting a fake victory in a fake election the way righties got to taunt lefties when Trump won in 2016. It will NEVER be the same thing.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Matt Dillon (01-20-2021), Truth Detector (01-25-2021)

  3. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,035
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,923 Times in 13,192 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 832 Times in 791 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpet View Post
    Empirical evidence tends to be subjective, and therefore is not conclusive proof.
    I think we need more data on your mental state with that comment. Maybe we can start here:

    https://www.quizony.com/how-insane-are-you/index.html

    Empirical evidence is measurable and the whole basis for things like the scientific method.

    Empirical evidence is information acquired by observation or experimentation. Scientists record and analyze this data. The process is a central part of the scientific method.
    https://www.livescience.com/21456-em...tific%20method.

    Stochastic evidence is subjective to some extent, and heuristic evidence is subjective.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-25-2021)

  5. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    I thoroughly enjoyed taunting lefties back in 2016 when Trump won with the majority of the kind of votes that matter, but unfortunately for lefties, they will never enjoy being able to enjoy the same taste of victory. Sure the transition of power thing is nice for lefties and all, but it is much more enjoyable to be able to flaunt real winning than it is to flaunt looted or stolen goods. Lefties will NEVER enjoy flaunting a fake victory in a fake election the way righties got to taunt lefties when Trump won in 2016. It will NEVER be the same thing.
    Projection. Your use of the word flaunt reveals everything. You think it's a contest. It isn't. It's about country and constitution. You've demonstrated clearly you care about neither. You only care about 'flaunting'.

  6. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    I think we need more data on your mental state with that comment. Maybe we can start here:

    https://www.quizony.com/how-insane-are-you/index.html

    Empirical evidence is measurable and the whole basis for things like the scientific method.


    https://www.livescience.com/21456-em...tific%20method.

    Stochastic evidence is subjective to some extent, and heuristic evidence is subjective.
    "Empirical" means "based on observation or experience,"

    But who's doing the observating??? Was the observer objective????????? In this case I strongly feel that the observer only care to see what he/she wanted to see.
    Lock Him Up

  7. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,454
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 1,037 Times in 727 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 372 Times in 345 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Here is why I doubt the election results. But most importantly, why any election using mail in ballots should be met with skepticism.

    I find it very difficult to believe that an incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist could win with 80 million votes, bettering Obama by 15,367,303 votes. A guy who could barely fill a thimble of supporters at rallies and rarely came out of the basement or remember what office he was actually running for.

    I find it very difficult to believe that Trump, garnering 74,222,958 votes, which beat a much more popular Obama by 8.307,163 votes and who had massive, enthusiastic crowds at his events, could lose an election by 7,060,140 votes.

    I find it difficult to believe that Trump, who bettered his 2016 election WIN by 11,237,852 votes and would still lose.

    I find it difficult to believe that a election turnout for Obama was 57.1% and 9.2% lower than this election at 66.3%. That's the highest turnout for a boring candidate in the history of the Republic.
    Turnout increased in every state and in 98 percent of the nation’s counties.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...voter-turnout/

    I find it difficult to believe that Republicans INCREASED their House presence by 13 seats, yet Trump lost by such a large margin to a incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist.

    BUT, leftists, being the low IQ, uneducated, gullible dumbasses that they are, show ZERO curiosity and merely parrot the dimwitted narratives they are fed by the PHONY media. They're incapable of thinking for themselves.


    2018 Dems 212 Republicans 199
    2020 Dems 222 Republicans 212

    Obama 2012 - 65,915,796
    Trump 2016 - 62,985,106
    Biden 2020 - 81,283,098
    Trump 2020 - 74,222,958
    I'm sure there are many, many things you have difficulty understanding. It doesn't mean such things are suspect. It does mean you're stupid.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to TexanManWithPlans For This Post:

    CASPER (01-20-2021)

  9. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,713
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,437 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    I thoroughly enjoyed taunting lefties back in 2016 when Trump won with the majority of the kind of votes that matter, but unfortunately for lefties, they will never enjoy being able to enjoy the same taste of victory. Sure the transition of power thing is nice for lefties and all, but it is much more enjoyable to be able to flaunt real winning than it is to flaunt looted or stolen goods. Lefties will NEVER enjoy flaunting a fake victory in a fake election the way righties got to taunt lefties when Trump won in 2016. It will NEVER be the same thing.
    Some people just can't admit they lost.

  10. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Trump said that Obama lost "by a lot," that Trump won the popular vote in 2016 and 2020 and said in advance if he did not win it would be because it was rigged. And his supporters believed him.

    We don't have to prove Biden won in a free and fair election. Somebody has to prove there was fraud which nobody has been able to do---they only repeat the same "fraud" that is repeated every presidential election.
    It will NEVER be proven that Beijing Biden won in a free and fair election. This is because winning and stealing are not the same thing. Trump will forever be the only candidate who actually "won" the most votes from actual voters, while Beijing will remain the one who "received" the most votes from virtual voters, algorithms, and fake ballots. Beijing will NEVER be known as a winner.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-25-2021)

  12. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    Projection. Your use of the word flaunt reveals everything. You think it's a contest. It isn't. It's about country and constitution. You've demonstrated clearly you care about neither. You only care about 'flaunting'.
    I thoroughly enjoyed taunting lefties back in 2016 when Trump won with the majority of the kind of votes that matter, but unfortunately for lefties, they will never enjoy being able to enjoy the same taste of victory. Sure the transition of power thing is nice for lefties and all, but it is much more enjoyable to be able to flaunt real winning than it is to flaunt looted or stolen goods. Lefties will NEVER enjoy flaunting a fake victory in a fake election the way righties got to taunt lefties when Trump won in 2016. It will NEVER be the same thing.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-25-2021)

  14. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,827
    Thanks
    19,711
    Thanked 9,447 Times in 7,737 Posts
    Groans
    835
    Groaned 509 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Port Tack View Post
    The right must be pretty fucking stupid if the election was stolen yet they could not come up with a shred of evidence to insinuate much less prove it.
    It took them a week to fraud up enough votes to beat Trump after election night. They had to count all the votes to get a number to beat.

    When has an American election not been called on election night? Never before in my lifetime.

    The cheating was planned and the media is complicit in it. The "press" started running cover for the cheat delay a month or two before the election.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Matt Dillon For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-25-2021)

  16. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Some people just can't admit they lost.
    It will NEVER be proven that Beijing Biden won in a free and fair election. This is because winning and stealing are not the same thing. Trump will forever be the only candidate who actually "won" the most votes from actual voters, while Beijing will remain the one who "received" the most votes from virtual voters, algorithms, and fake ballots. Beijing will NEVER be known as a winner.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-25-2021)

  18. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    5,711
    Thanks
    1,208
    Thanked 3,175 Times in 2,096 Posts
    Groans
    31
    Groaned 80 Times in 80 Posts

    Default

    BUT, tRumpanzees, being the low IQ, uneducated, gullible dumbasses that they are, show ZERO curiosity and merely parrot the dimwitted narratives they are fed by the ex POTUS and his po propaganda machine. They're incapable of thinking for themselves.
    Please leave your Trump 2024 signs in your yard. That way, my dog will know where to take a dump.

  19. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,960
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Here is why I doubt the election results. But most importantly, why any election using mail in ballots should be met with skepticism.

    I find it very difficult to believe that an incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist could win with 80 million votes, bettering Obama by 15,367,303 votes. A guy who could barely fill a thimble of supporters at rallies and rarely came out of the basement or remember what office he was actually running for.

    I find it very difficult to believe that Trump, garnering 74,222,958 votes, which beat a much more popular Obama by 8.307,163 votes and who had massive, enthusiastic crowds at his events, could lose an election by 7,060,140 votes.

    I find it difficult to believe that Trump, who bettered his 2016 election WIN by 11,237,852 votes and would still lose.

    I find it difficult to believe that a election turnout for Obama was 57.1% and 9.2% lower than this election at 66.3%. That's the highest turnout for a boring candidate in the history of the Republic.
    Turnout increased in every state and in 98 percent of the nation’s counties.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...voter-turnout/

    I find it difficult to believe that Republicans INCREASED their House presence by 13 seats, yet Trump lost by such a large margin to a incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist.

    BUT, leftists, being the low IQ, uneducated, gullible dumbasses that they are, show ZERO curiosity and merely parrot the dimwitted narratives they are fed by the PHONY media. They're incapable of thinking for themselves.


    2018 Dems 212 Republicans 199
    2020 Dems 222 Republicans 212

    Obama 2012 - 65,915,796
    Trump 2016 - 62,985,106
    Biden 2020 - 81,283,098
    Trump 2020 - 74,222,958
    Easy to explain, cause 81 million plus Americans voted for Biden, six more than voted for Trump

  20. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Here is why I doubt the election results. But most importantly, why any election using mail in ballots should be met with skepticism.

    I find it very difficult to believe that an incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist could win with 80 million votes, bettering Obama by 15,367,303 votes. A guy who could barely fill a thimble of supporters at rallies and rarely came out of the basement or remember what office he was actually running for.

    I find it very difficult to believe that Trump, garnering 74,222,958 votes, which beat a much more popular Obama by 8.307,163 votes and who had massive, enthusiastic crowds at his events, could lose an election by 7,060,140 votes.

    I find it difficult to believe that Trump, who bettered his 2016 election WIN by 11,237,852 votes and would still lose.

    I find it difficult to believe that a election turnout for Obama was 57.1% and 9.2% lower than this election at 66.3%. That's the highest turnout for a boring candidate in the history of the Republic.
    Turnout increased in every state and in 98 percent of the nation’s counties.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...voter-turnout/

    I find it difficult to believe that Republicans INCREASED their House presence by 13 seats, yet Trump lost by such a large margin to a incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist.

    BUT, leftists, being the low IQ, uneducated, gullible dumbasses that they are, show ZERO curiosity and merely parrot the dimwitted narratives they are fed by the PHONY media. They're incapable of thinking for themselves.


    2018 Dems 212 Republicans 199
    2020 Dems 222 Republicans 212

    Obama 2012 - 65,915,796
    Trump 2016 - 62,985,106
    Biden 2020 - 81,283,098
    Trump 2020 - 74,222,958

  21. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,827
    Thanks
    19,711
    Thanked 9,447 Times in 7,737 Posts
    Groans
    835
    Groaned 509 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Easy to explain, cause 81 million plus Americans voted for Biden, six more than voted for Trump
    And only 65 million voted for Obama? Can you not see the glaring disparity looking you right in the face with that?

    Obama had a huge turnout.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Matt Dillon For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-25-2021)

  23. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,713
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,657 Times in 4,437 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    It will NEVER be proven that Beijing Biden won in a free and fair election. This is because winning and stealing are not the same thing. Trump will forever be the only candidate who actually "won" the most votes from actual voters, while Beijing will remain the one who "received" the most votes from virtual voters, algorithms, and fake ballots. Beijing will NEVER be known as a winner.
    Get over it Evmentro---except your loss and move on.

Similar Threads

  1. Election Results
    By StoneByStone in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 11-18-2020, 01:33 AM
  2. Trump Again Sows Doubt About Election
    By jacksonsprat22 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-24-2020, 09:11 PM
  3. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-04-2020, 08:09 PM
  4. Ryan casts doubt on 'bizarre' California election results
    By Bourbon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-29-2018, 01:32 PM
  5. Tuesday's Election Results!
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-20-2010, 08:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •