Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Institutional Mass Murder Is Redundant

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default Institutional Mass Murder Is Redundant

    Only institutions can engage in mass murder. Serial killers kill one victim at a time over a long period. More importantly, serial killers harbor no dreams of killing millions, while institutional killers never stop dreaming about, and planning for, politically sanctioned mass murder. (Democrats were on the path to mass murder long before Scum-Sucking Joe Biden won his first election in 1973.)


    "Be passionate in everything you do, but always remember that violence is never the answer and will never be justified."

    Melania Trump says 'violence is never the answer' in farewell message
    by Haley Victory Smith
    January 18, 2021 03:55 PM

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...rewell-message

    Melania Trump’s heart is in the right place even though she fails to understand the three requirements needed to set institutional mass murder in motion.

    1. Every individual committing institutional murder is protected by a group of many.

    2. Institutional murderers must have the law on their side.

    3. Institutional murderers must be positive they will not be punished before they kill anyone. Law enforcement, the courts, and the U.S. Congress gave mass murderers that assurance on the day Scummy Joe Biden got the Democrat Party’s nomination.

    Institutional mass murder is not a new thing.

    Roman Catholic Tomás de Torquemada justified violence by killing and converting tens of thousands of Muslims and Jews in late 15th century.

    Muslim Turks justified mass murder when they murdered millions of Christians in the final years of the Ottoman Empire (early 20th century).




    Soviet Communists starved millions of Ukranians to death.




    NOTE: Pus-Brain Biden imitates Lenin:

    ‘The way to crush conservatives is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.’

    yet the lying thief swears he is not a Communist. (Imagine what Lenin could have done with COVID-19 vaccinations?)

    Nazi Germany justified violence by promising to kill all of the Jews in Europe.

    Islam justifies violence by promising to kill all of the Jews in the World.

    China’s Communists justified killing ten of millions by promising pure Communism. Pus-Brain is relying upon his appointments to justify pure Communism with thousands foot soldiers educated and controlled by Communist professors.


    In revolutions, the second generation, the one that’s been weaned on the revolution, is always truer and purer in its beliefs than the first generation. Like all true believers, these children of the revolution will brutally purge heretics, which is why revolutions always eat their own. The most famous recent example is Mao’s Cultural Revolution, which saw students violently destroy anyone who deviated from Maoist doctrine. We’re witnessing that now across corporate America, especially in the media, as college grads destroy the woke leftists who hired them.

    China’s Cultural Revolution began in 1966. When it ended a decade later, tens of millions of people had been brutally persecuted, and hundreds of thousands, perhaps even as many as 20 million, people had been slaughtered in massacres across China. Then, as now, the revolution was incubated in the country's colleges.

    Nie Yuanzi, a philosophy professor at Peking University, triggered the Cultural Revolution when she put up the first big character poster attacking the college president and others in the college as bourgeois reactionaries. Mao endorsed her poster, and the Cultural Revolution began.

    James David Banker’s article about the Cultural Revolution describes how schools were turned into places of propaganda rather than knowledge and how the indoctrinated students brutally turned on their teachers, their families, and their friends. He then has this to say about the genius behind using public education to revolutionize students:


    Mao’s decision to use China’s youth as his vanguard was, by fortune or foresight, instrumental to the revolution’s initial success. The young may be pure in heart, but they are also high on emotion and short on life experience. Simply put, they are natural philistines. Still in their identity-forming years, China’s young had few barriers to a complete identification with the Red Guards. Conformity and intolerance of dissent followed naturally. [snip] With undeveloped mental immune systems, their soft skulls were fertile ground for Mao’s secular Manichaeism. Manichaeism reduces society, with all the diversity and complexity of human experience, to a blunt dichotomy: light and darkness, good and evil, right and wrong, radical and reactionary. “There is no middle way!” became a popular slogan. Ideologies like these are intellectually and morally vapid, yet their simplicity and certainty are alluring, especially to the young. Thus, Mao’s child revolutionaries could—with youthful exuberance and clarity of purpose—chain a teacher to a radiator and bludgeon him to death with an iron bar, or force a teacher to eat nails and feces, among other tortures.

    [snip]

    Eating human flesh became a macabre proof of loyalty. The Party’s own investigations tell of students in Guangxi province cooking and eating their teachers and principals. In some government cafeterias, the bodies of executed traitors were displayed on meat hooks, while their flesh was served and consumed. The blank slate, it seems, can also be a dark abyss.


    American college graduates aren’t eating people . . . yet. They have reached the phase of figurative cannibalism, which is most visible at media outlets -- the same outlets that have been at the forefront of pushing hardcore leftism on America and have wildly cheered the Black Lives Matters riots.

    The biggest story comes from The New York Times. The old guard at the paper, which still has a residual sense that the paper’s opinion pages should showcase diverse viewpoints, invited Senator Tom Cotton to write an opinion piece about using military troops to quell riots in American cities.

    The piece, “Send in the Troops,” ignited a firestorm. The storm, though, raged primarily within the four walls of the New York Times. Young staff members, indoctrinated in leftism at college and told that words will always hurt them, argued that Cotton, by urging Trump to use the same troops that helped bring Civil Rights to the South, staged a rebellion. (Outsiders also argued that the op-ed was “fascist.”) The Times’ management caved before the implacable children of its revolution and, in a further act of intellectual cowardice, hid behind a wall of lies about Cotton to do so.

    The Maoist mob also attacked at Variety, the entertainment paper. Editor in Chief Claudia Eller took a knee for the paper, acknowledging that Variety had failed in its obligations to increase racial diversity. Ironically enough, considering that it’s “Pride Month,” Eller’s focus had been on what’s currently an irrelevant kind of diversity -- LGBTQ diversity.

    A former reporter publicly stated that Eller’s racial grovel was inadequate, to which Eller responded that the reporter sounded “bitter.” The college-grad crybullies got “upset,” the news organization engaged in “soul-searching,” and Eller found herself bounced for a comment that would have been ignored a decade ago but that today was “plainly unacceptable.”

    Meanwhile, at the Philadelphia Inquirer, the college-grad mob forced editor Stan Wischnowski to resign. His sin? He published an article saying an opinion piece decrying the mob’s wanton destruction and headlined it “Buildings Matter too.” To America’s Maoists, only black lives matter (for now). Wischnowski, despite issuing the ritual apology, was out.

    America’s mini-Maoist madmen are de-throning their mentors, a symbolic form of cannibalism. Nevertheless, I doubt that ousted, older cohort of true believers will rethink their leftism. They will merely become professional apologizers for their ideological impurity, living forever in the hope that they will be welcomed back into the leftist fold.


    June 7, 2020
    Mao’s Cultural Revolution has landed in America
    By Andrea Widburg

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...n_america.html

    Finally, all mass murderers have one thing in common. True believers are convinced that violence works if EVERYBODY they want to kill is put to death; hence, PURE COMMUNISM.

    Put it this way —— no Nazi, or Muslim, or Christian, or Communist true believer ever said ‘Lets limit the killing to 25 percent.’

    In short: It is all or nothing for Biden’s institutional mass murderers.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,912
    Thanks
    1,543
    Thanked 1,594 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    146
    Groaned 151 Times in 148 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Ummm, what mass murders?

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CASPER View Post
    Ummm, what mass murders?
    To CASPER: Try this:

    VIDEO


    https://video.foxnews.com/v/62239335...#sp=show-clips

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...72#post4168272
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,912
    Thanks
    1,543
    Thanked 1,594 Times in 1,057 Posts
    Groans
    146
    Groaned 151 Times in 148 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    First Link did not work...
    Second one is Nonsense.
    What is ya got as an explanation?

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CASPER View Post
    First Link did not work...
    Second one is Nonsense.
    What is ya got as an explanation?
    To CASPER: Go to number 24 permalink:

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...72#post4168272

    I write my messages for conservatives who do not have to have everything explained to them. In the future get someone to help you with your reading comprehension skills if you respond to my threads instead of asking clever questions.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Similar Threads

  1. Trump. GUILTY of mass murder!
    By overkill in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-12-2020, 05:59 PM
  2. asg opts for Mass Murder
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-24-2020, 09:07 AM
  3. Someone explain to me how this isn't mass murder
    By Jerome in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 05-21-2020, 07:17 AM
  4. The faces of mass murder
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-05-2019, 06:01 PM
  5. Ill will: the scarcity mentality and mass murder
    By Hermes Thoth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-14-2010, 08:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •