Oooh more right-wing horseshit. Superfreak's favorite!
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/81826
"Are we really supposed to believe there were 482 legitimate errors by voters, or a lesser number combined with legitimate counting errors, that all came in one contest and all in one direction? And that at the same time there were virtually no errors in all other contests and none benefitting any other Senate candidates?
If it walks, talks and smells like cheating, it's cheating. And sadly, there isn't anyone in a position to stop this that isn't a partisan Democrat and therefore willing to ignore or abet the effort so as to produce the result they personally want."
More at link...
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Oooh more right-wing horseshit. Superfreak's favorite!
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
SUPERTOOL'S crying is freaking awesome
The stone that the builder refused
Will always be the head corner stone
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
I've grown to like Desh but I think it's pretty funny because if the tables were turned it would be non stop conspiracy posts..
GFY
Which adjustments? The ones prior to the audit wherein both candidates gained and lost votes on a precinct by precinct basis which resulted in net gains for Franken or the adjustments make after the audit which resulted in a net gain for Coleman, both of which don't matter one fucking whit because going into the recount each candidate had 0 votes?
I'm tired of this garbage.
I certainly hope they can steal it, because O'Reilly can't friggin' stand Franken; he's one of those guys where he can't even say his name. If Franken's a Senator, he'll lose it...
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
dems cheat just as much at pubs. We will see it now that the cheating scum dems come out of the woodwork feeling safe with the majority and obama. They will scam, lie, and cheat themselves out of office just the same way the pubs did. Birds of a feather
Q: Senator Obama, would you take the same pledge? No tax increases on people under $250,000?
OBAMA: I not only have pledged not to raise their taxes, I've been the first candidate in this race to specifically say I would cut their taxes.
I posted a thread on the recount, the only thing that matters and it was actually intended to be a lighthearted post about the recount and ballot challenge process, highlighting the difficulty involved and making light of the silly challenges from both candidates.
Instead, it turn into yet another zombie lies thread.
Bookmarks