Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence.??

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Text Drivers are Killers View Post
I don't respond to putas or trannies.

You realize Taichipolesmoker fucked up big...right? You can own right now if you really want to.

Why are you always following my posts and threads like a bitch in heat looking for attention? Text doesn't have the brains or courage to deal with facts that prove him wrong. You are so absurd that once I reduce you to a babbling right wingnut troll, I put you on IA. Every month or so I let clowns like you out to see if you've grown intelletually. Now, why don't you tell the reading audience how I "fucked up big", and maybe we can have a rational discussion before you lose it and go back on IA?

[Lightbringer]

Why are you always following my posts and threads like a bitch in heat looking for attention? Text doesn't have the brains or courage to deal with facts that prove him wrong. You are so absurd that once I reduce you to a babbling right wingnut troll, I put you on IA. Every month or so I let clowns like you out to see if you've grown intelletually. Now, why don't you tell the reading audience how I "fucked up big", and maybe we can have a rational discussion before you lose it and go back on IA?

You said a long time ago you put me on iggy.

I wasn't talking to you, I was advising Text that you are so stupid you link to articles that discredit your own position. Do you want to play or do you want to go back to pretending you have me on iggy faggot?

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Why are you always following my posts and threads like a bitch in heat looking for attention? Text doesn't have the brains or courage to deal with facts that prove him wrong. You are so absurd that once I reduce you to a babbling right wingnut troll, I put you on IA. Every month or so I let clowns like you out to see if you've grown intelletually. Now, why don't you tell the reading audience how I "fucked up big", and maybe we can have a rational discussion before you lose it and go back on IA?

HAHAHAHA. I love watching you explode every time someone calls you a tranny.

[BartenderElite]

Let's repeat the obvious:

The ONLY reason that anyone thinks there was "massive voter fraud" is because a pathological liar who has never told the truth in his life said so.

[danielpalos]

They all just refused to hear the cases citing crap like "lack of standing". The fake news press says courts have rejected all claims of electoral fraud but that's a brazen lie. The courts know the election was stolen and don't want to admit the truth and be crucified by the press.

Maybe, in right wing fantasy y'all are Always Right, but in Court you need credible evidence not merely right wingers having nothing but fallacy while insisting they are for the "gospel Truth".

But just as he cried foul before a single vote was cast – something he also did in 2016 – Trump has maintained he was robbed of victory without any credible evidence to support that belief.

Despite assurances from his own departments of Justice and Homeland Security that no serious fraud occurred, Trump has raged against the election result and mounted a relentless campaign to reverse President-elect Joe Biden's 306-232 Electoral College win.--https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/2021/01/06/trumps-failed-efforts-overturn-election-numbers/4130307001/

[Concart]

A bunch of them. They were looking at a blank piece of paper.

[Concart]

Nevada:

A state judge in Nevada dismissed with prejudice the Trump campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the state’s election results Friday, ruling the campaign had no evidence to prove its allegations of voter fraud and thwarting the Trump campaign’s attempt to challenge President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the state.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...h=7bfcb58112c4

Arizona:

The Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously affirmed Biden's victory in the state, upholding a lower court's finding that there was no misconduct, fraud or illegal voting in the general election.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ud/3869239001/

In Pennsylvania, Trump didn't even claim there WAS fraud.

In a separate state case in Montgomery County, Pa., a judge asked Trump lawyer Jonathan S. Goldstein whether he was alleging fraud. “Your honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” Goldstein said. “And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the [Democratic National Committee] or anybody else involved in this a liar. Everybody is coming to this with good faith.” The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”

On Thursday, a judge rejected the Trump campaign’s attempt to throw out absentee ballots in the Bucks County case, noting, “The parties specifically stipulated in their comprehensive stipulation of facts that there exists no evidence of any fraud, misconduct, or any impropriety with respect to the challenged ballots. There is nothing in the record and nothing alleged that would lead to the conclusion that any of the challenged ballots were submitted by someone not qualified or entitled to vote in this election.”

https://time.com/5914377/donald-trum...vidence-fraud/


STFU traitor.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence?

Nope.

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/...f&seqNo=315395

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/...f&seqNo=315283

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-con...ar-Doc-574.pdf

https://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/sites/...0-2078_202.pdf

The funny thing is that the lawyers for Trump never presented any evidence of fraud. How can the courts inspect evidence that they are never given?

[Poor Richard Saunders]

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-con...ar-Doc-574.pdf

On page 62, the judge discusses the actual evidence presented by the Trump lawyers and dispenses with it as being speculative.

Based on the evidence presented by Plaintiffs, accepted as true, Plaintiffs have only proven the “possibility of future injury” based on a series of speculative events—which falls short of the requirement to establish a concrete injury.

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Why are you always following my posts and threads like a bitch in heat looking for attention? Text doesn't have the brains or courage to deal with facts that prove him wrong. You are so absurd that once I reduce you to a babbling right wingnut troll, I put you on IA. Every month or so I let clowns like you out to see if you've grown intelletually. Now, why don't you tell the reading audience how I "fucked up big", and maybe we can have a rational discussion before you lose it and go back on IA?

HAHAHAHA. I love watching you explode every time someone calls you a tranny.

And there you have it folks....another right wingnut troll loses it when faced with a direct, simple request to meet a burden of proof on his accusations and assertions. This cackling clown projects his psycho sexual bent and personal attiude at these junctures with other posters. Yep, ol Text has had it, and I'm done giving him attention.

Buh-bye Text. See ya in a month or so. I'll look forward to seeing you following me around.

[Taichiliberal]

Nevada:

A state judge in Nevada dismissed with prejudice the Trump campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the state’s election results Friday, ruling the campaign had no evidence to prove its allegations of voter fraud and thwarting the Trump campaign’s attempt to challenge President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the state.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...h=7bfcb58112c4

Arizona:

The Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously affirmed Biden's victory in the state, upholding a lower court's finding that there was no misconduct, fraud or illegal voting in the general election.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ud/3869239001/

In Pennsylvania, Trump didn't even claim there WAS fraud.

In a separate state case in Montgomery County, Pa., a judge asked Trump lawyer Jonathan S. Goldstein whether he was alleging fraud. “Your honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” Goldstein said. “And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the [Democratic National Committee] or anybody else involved in this a liar. Everybody is coming to this with good faith.” The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”

On Thursday, a judge rejected the Trump campaign’s attempt to throw out absentee ballots in the Bucks County case, noting, “The parties specifically stipulated in their comprehensive stipulation of facts that there exists no evidence of any fraud, misconduct, or any impropriety with respect to the challenged ballots. There is nothing in the record and nothing alleged that would lead to the conclusion that any of the challenged ballots were submitted by someone not qualified or entitled to vote in this election.”

https://time.com/5914377/donald-trum...vidence-fraud/


STFU traitor.