Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence.??

[Text Drivers are Killers]

They all just refused to hear the cases citing crap like "lack of standing". The fake news press says courts have rejected all claims of electoral fraud but that's a brazen lie. The courts know the election was stolen and don't want to admit the truth and be crucified by the press.

[Legion]

Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence?

Nope.

[archives]

They all just refused to hear the cases citing crap like "lack of standing". The fake news press says courts have rejected all claims of electoral fraud but that's a brazen lie. The courts know the election was stolen and don't want to admit the truth and be crucified by the press.

Wrong, plus “lack of standing” implies bogus rational for bringing the case

[Legion]

Wrong, plus “lack of standing” implies bogus rational for bringing the case

Is that so, Anchovies?

Who told you that?

Which Court heard the evidence presented by Plaintiffs?

I'll understand if you don't know, of course.

[cancel2 2022]

Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence?

Nope.

No, classic arse covering.

[Legion]

No, classic arse covering.

I am unaware of any Court actually hearing a complaint.

Can anyone name one?

[Micawber]

You can't look at what doesn't exist moron.

[AProudLefty]

I am sorry but you lost. I symphatize with you. I do.

[Micawber]

I don't. I hope he never accepts it and tortures his own soul and eats himself alive forever posting lies over and over and wastes his most miserable life
the same way he has been for 10 years.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

No, classic arse covering.

Trump will sue the states over this election fraud and be awarded hundreds of millions of dollars. The truth will come out.

[Lightbringer]

Can anyone point to a Court that actually looked at the election fraud evidence.??

Michigan 13th Circuit.

[BartenderElite]

For goodness' sake. Are people really saying 'voter fraud?'

[no worries]

They all just refused to hear the cases citing crap like "lack of standing". The fake news press says courts have rejected all claims of electoral fraud but that's a brazen lie. The courts know the election was stolen and don't want to admit the truth and be crucified by the press.

60 courts rejected crazy eyes and the looney woman's claims of election fraud because they have no evidence, hearsay isn't evidence, that is lack of standing.

Just like most of Dotard's claims, he can't prove them, if Dotard shows up in court claiming he's a billionaire, he needs financial documents or bank statements to prove it.

So, when crazy eyes makes his opening statement of voter fraud, why didn't he bring in ONE eyewitness, a poll worker, a teabagger observer of the count or any employee of Dominion?

In 60 court cases, crazy eyes couldn't bring one witness to testify?

They aren't that stupid, they didn't want to go to jail or prison.

[no worries]

I don't. I hope he never accepts it and tortures his own soul and eats himself alive forever posting lies over and over and wastes his most miserable life
the same way he has been for 10 years.

Actually, it's more like 50 years.

[Walt]

They all just refused to hear the cases citing crap like "lack of standing". The fake news press says courts have rejected all claims of electoral fraud but that's a brazen lie. The courts know the election was stolen and don't want to admit the truth and be crucified by the press.

They actually asked repeatedly if there was any evidence, and no evidence was provided. Now you are claiming that the lack of evidence proves it?