Biden Shouldn't Even Attempt To Work With Republicans After This

[anatta]

Has to if he wants to get anything thru Congress

Compromise is one of the pillars of any democracy, nothing is attained without it

democracy? LMAO
it's one party rule. pack the courts and end the filibuster - ram thru the green new deal.

[reagansghost]

democracy? LMAO
it's one party rule. pack the courts and end the filibuster - ram thru the green new deal.

so which Trump insurrection are you attending Sunday shithead?

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

The First Amendment doesn't prohibit the ability of private enterprise to shut down dissent.

DEMOCRATS have already formed a committee to help their "partners" identify "hate speech" and "dangerous disinformation", but sine they are only "advising" Big tech, they aren't violating the First Amendment.

but with privatization of the commons, and 230 protections in place, platforms are a newly defined legal type. with protections from liability, a responsibility to not over edit is implied. and if it's not fully spelled out in the law, 230 needs to be reopened and altered.

privatization of the commons demands these safguards, fake patriot globalist spook.

go do another false flag.

[anatta]

but with privatization of the commons, and 230 protections in place, platforms are a newly defined legal type. with protections from liability, a responsibility to not over edit is implied. and if it's not fully spelled out in the law, 230 needs to be reopened and altered.

fat chance that happens. Dems have fascist Big Tech at their disposal

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

fat chance that happens. Dems have fascist Big Tech at their disposal

it's definitely happening. legion supports big tech censorship too, don't forget. all globalist "libertarians" seem to.

[Legion]

but with privatization of the commons, and 230 protections in place, platforms are a newly defined legal type. with protections from liability, a responsibility to not over edit is implied. and if it's not fully spelled out in the law, 230 needs to be reopened and altered.

That won't happen. The usurper has already begun packing the bureaucracy with Silicon Valley sycophants.

• Tom Sullivan, Amazon’s director of international tax planning (State Department)
• Brandon Belford, Lyft’s senior director to the chief of staff (Office of Management and Budget)
• Divya Kumaraiah, Airbnb’s strategy and program lead for cities (Office of Management and Budget)
• Will Fields, Sidewalk Labs’ senior development associate (Treasury Department)
• Nicole Wong, former Google and Twitter, former Obama Deputy Chief Technology Officer (Office of Science and Technology Policy)
• Martha Gimbel, senior manager of economic research at Schmidt Futures (Council of Economic Advisers)
• Linda Etim, senior adviser at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (team lead for International Development)

https://www.protocol.com/bulletins/bidens-transition-is-stacked-with-tech-players#toggle-gdpr

Senior employees of tech giants such as Facebook, Google and Twitter are preparing to join the usurper’s administration amid a digital crackdown on online dissent.

Big Tech aides pouring into the White House and federal agencies will give the companies access to decision-makers, including the usurper, conflating the policies of the large companies and the government.

The influx is likely to influence anti-trust actions and the future of Section 230 legal protections.

One of the most powerful figures in the White House later this month will be Jessica Hertz, a Facebook lawyer who will serve as the usurper’s White House staff secretary, vetting correspondence, regulations and appointments that will reach his desk.

Emily Horne, who will broker the White House National Security Council’s communications with the media, worked at Twitter, according to her LinkedIn profile.

A fleet of other Big Tech vets are helping review appointments for the usurper’s transition office.

Mark Schwartz from Amazon Web Services is helping vet appointments to the White House Office of Management and Budget, which controls spending policy across the federal bureaucracy.

Google global program manager Deon Scott is reviewing applicants to the Department of Homeland Security, Facebook strategic response aide Zaid Zaid is on the the usurper’s vetting team for State Department jobs, Facebook associate general counsel Christopher Upperman is working on the Small Business Administration, and Facebook director of strategic response Rachel Lieber is vetting spy agency staff.

Amazon international tax director Tom Sullivan is vetting State Department appointments and Cynthia Hogan, who led Apple’s lobbying as vice president for public policy and government affairs, previously helped with the usurper’s VP selection vetting.

In DC, a widely accepted axiom says “Personnel is policy,” and civil libertarians are expressing concern.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald, whose reporting on whistleblower Edward Snowden’s 2013 mass surveillance revelations won a Pulitzer Prize, tweeted, “History moves quickly. The 9/11 attack was 20 years ago. That means nobody under 35, maybe 40, has a real political memory of it. Liberals begging corporations to censor ‘extremist’ speech. Emotions exploited to demand quick new anti-terrorism laws & powers? The same dynamic.”

The American Civil Liberties Union’s senior legislative counsel Kate Ruane said, “It should concern everyone when companies like Facebook and Twitter wield the unchecked power to remove people from platforms that have become indispensable for the speech of billions — especially when political realities make those decisions easier.”

Journalist Michael Tracey, a past supporter of socialist Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, wrote, “The new corporate authoritarian liberal-left monoculture is going to be absolutely ruthless — and in 12 days it is merging with the state. This is only the beginning… The real ‘threat’ at this point is crazed oligarchs + politicians using the ‘crisis’ to consolidate power.”

President Trump has waged continuous efforts throughout his administration to repeal Section 230 in an effort to curb political bias by tech companies. In December, he vetoed the annual defense spending bill because Congress did not repeal Section 230, citing it as a matter of national security and election integrity.



https://nypost.com/2021/01/11/big-tech-alums-fill-biden-posts-amid-crackdown-on-trump-allies/

[T. A. Gardner]

Trump was impeached twice. Some day that will register with you.

So? What the hell does that have to do with anything I said? It's a completely lunatic non sequitur on your part.

[Phantasmal]

So much for healing and unity. I knew Biden was a liar just like all Democrats. Sad.

Don’t blame Biden, he’s trying.

[BidenPresident]

So? What the hell does that have to do with anything I said? It's a completely lunatic non sequitur on your part.

get lost asshole

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

That won't happen. The usurper has already begun packing the bureaucracy with Silicon Valley sycophants.

• Tom Sullivan, Amazon’s director of international tax planning (State Department)
• Brandon Belford, Lyft’s senior director to the chief of staff (Office of Management and Budget)
• Divya Kumaraiah, Airbnb’s strategy and program lead for cities (Office of Management and Budget)
• Will Fields, Sidewalk Labs’ senior development associate (Treasury Department)
• Nicole Wong, former Google and Twitter, former Obama Deputy Chief Technology Officer (Office of Science and Technology Policy)
• Martha Gimbel, senior manager of economic research at Schmidt Futures (Council of Economic Advisers)
• Linda Etim, senior adviser at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (team lead for International Development)

https://www.protocol.com/bulletins/bidens-transition-is-stacked-with-tech-players#toggle-gdpr

Senior employees of tech giants such as Facebook, Google and Twitter are preparing to join the usurper’s administration amid a digital crackdown on online dissent.

Big Tech aides pouring into the White House and federal agencies will give the companies access to decision-makers, including the usurper, conflating the policies of the large companies and the government.

The influx is likely to influence anti-trust actions and the future of Section 230 legal protections.

One of the most powerful figures in the White House later this month will be Jessica Hertz, a Facebook lawyer who will serve as the usurper’s White House staff secretary, vetting correspondence, regulations and appointments that will reach his desk.

Emily Horne, who will broker the White House National Security Council’s communications with the media, worked at Twitter, according to her LinkedIn profile.

A fleet of other Big Tech vets are helping review appointments for the usurper’s transition office.

Mark Schwartz from Amazon Web Services is helping vet appointments to the White House Office of Management and Budget, which controls spending policy across the federal bureaucracy.

Google global program manager Deon Scott is reviewing applicants to the Department of Homeland Security, Facebook strategic response aide Zaid Zaid is on the the usurper’s vetting team for State Department jobs, Facebook associate general counsel Christopher Upperman is working on the Small Business Administration, and Facebook director of strategic response Rachel Lieber is vetting spy agency staff.

Amazon international tax director Tom Sullivan is vetting State Department appointments and Cynthia Hogan, who led Apple’s lobbying as vice president for public policy and government affairs, previously helped with the usurper’s VP selection vetting.

In DC, a widely accepted axiom says “Personnel is policy,” and civil libertarians are expressing concern.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald, whose reporting on whistleblower Edward Snowden’s 2013 mass surveillance revelations won a Pulitzer Prize, tweeted, “History moves quickly. The 9/11 attack was 20 years ago. That means nobody under 35, maybe 40, has a real political memory of it. Liberals begging corporations to censor ‘extremist’ speech. Emotions exploited to demand quick new anti-terrorism laws & powers? The same dynamic.”

The American Civil Liberties Union’s senior legislative counsel Kate Ruane said, “It should concern everyone when companies like Facebook and Twitter wield the unchecked power to remove people from platforms that have become indispensable for the speech of billions — especially when political realities make those decisions easier.”

Journalist Michael Tracey, a past supporter of socialist Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, wrote, “The new corporate authoritarian liberal-left monoculture is going to be absolutely ruthless — and in 12 days it is merging with the state. This is only the beginning… The real ‘threat’ at this point is crazed oligarchs + politicians using the ‘crisis’ to consolidate power.”

President Trump has waged continuous efforts throughout his administration to repeal Section 230 in an effort to curb political bias by tech companies. In December, he vetoed the annual defense spending bill because Congress did not repeal Section 230, citing it as a matter of national security and election integrity.



https://nypost.com/2021/01/11/big-tech-alums-fill-biden-posts-amid-crackdown-on-trump-allies/

nah. it's definitely gonna happen, I know you support big tech censorship.

your dire scenario just isn't scary, psyops failure.

[Doc Dutch]

but you're still for deplatforming legal speech. so much for your distinction without a difference, with your fake libertarian bullshit.

Another lie, but you're young and ignorant, kid. I forgive. Adults who should know better, not so much.

[Doc Dutch]

Don’t blame Biden, he’s trying.

It's Biden's own voters who are calling him a liar. Yes, Biden is trying, but as proved by this thread, his voters won't support his agenda. They want more division and more hate.

[T. A. Gardner]

get lost asshole

Ah, from the type 2 ad hominem response straight to the type 3 vulgar insult. If you were a clock I could set my watch by it.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Another lie, but you're young and ignorant, kid. I forgive. Adults who should know better, not so much.

where's the lie? are you against deplatforming trump?

quick, think of some bullshit!

[BidenPresident]

Ah, from the type 2 ad hominem response straight to the type 3 vulgar insult. If you were a clock I could set my watch by it.

Drop the act. Okay?